IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v113y2014icp352-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A “carbonshed” assessment of small- vs. large-scale CCS deployment in the continental US

Author

Listed:
  • Eccles, Jordan K.
  • Pratson, Lincoln

Abstract

We present a model for rapidly costing and mapping out the cheapest option for organizing infrastructure to transport and store the CO2 emissions that might be captured in United States if carbon capture and storage (CCS) is deployed. We present the organization of transport infrastructure in terms of carbonsheds, regions in which it is cheaper to transport and store CO2 internally than to send the CO2 to other regions. We use our carbonshed framework to evaluate the effect of economies of scale on transport and storage. This is analyzed as the difference between developing small- vs. large-scale CCS systems on a national level, including how the potential depletion of CO2 reservoirs over time could impact costs born by coal power plants that capture CO2. We find that the average value of transport and storage when sources cooperate to reduce transport costs is roughly $10/ton, with costs decreasing as more storage reservoir options are included, and increasing as storage resources are depleted. Our depletion analysis indicates that large, centralized reservoirs could form the backbone of a major carbon storage system in the United States. Policymakers and industry planners could rapidly advance large-scale storage networks by skipping fragmented early networks and moving to large-scale systems at a relatively minor cost of $0–2/ton if 1.5Gt/year are captured from existing power plants by emphasizing cooperation or integrated planning and optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Eccles, Jordan K. & Pratson, Lincoln, 2014. "A “carbonshed” assessment of small- vs. large-scale CCS deployment in the continental US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 352-361.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:352-361
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913005680
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Middleton, Richard S. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M., 2009. "A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1052-1060, March.
    2. Middleton, Richard S. & Eccles, Jordan K., 2013. "The complex future of CO2 capture and storage: Variable electricity generation and fossil fuel power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 66-73.
    3. Herzog, Howard J., 2011. "Scaling up carbon dioxide capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 597-604, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    2. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    3. Putta, Koteswara Rao & Tobiesen, Finn Andrew & Svendsen, Hallvard F. & Knuutila, Hanna K., 2017. "Applicability of enhancement factor models for CO2 absorption into aqueous MEA solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 765-783.
    4. Tapia, John Frederick D. & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 337-345.
    5. Bernardo Llamas & Álvaro Hernández & Luis Felipe Mazadiego & Juan Pous, 2016. "Economic modeling of the CO 2 transportation phase and its application to the Duero Basin, Spain," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 648-661, October.
    6. Ewa Knapik & Katarzyna Chruszcz-Lipska, 2020. "Chemistry of Reservoir Fluids in the Aspect of CO 2 Injection for Selected Oil Reservoirs in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Rui, Zhenhua & Ezekiel, Justin & Zhang, Liang & Wang, Hongsheng, 2018. "The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 49-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massol, Olivier & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane & Banal-Estañol, Albert, 2018. "Capturing industrial CO2 emissions in Spain: Infrastructures, costs and break-even prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 545-560.
    2. Adrien Nicolle & Diego Cebreros & Olivier Massol & Emma Jagu, 2023. "Modeling CO2 pipeline systems: An analytical lens for CCS regulation," Post-Print hal-04297191, HAL.
    3. Sun, Liang & Chen, Wenying, 2017. "Development and application of a multi-stage CCUS source–sink matching model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1424-1432.
    4. Dai, C. & Cai, Y.P. & Li, Y.P. & Sun, W. & Wang, X.W. & Guo, H.C., 2014. "Optimal strategies for carbon capture, utilization and storage based on an inexact mλ-measure fuzzy chance-constrained programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 465-478.
    5. Cai, W. & Singham, D.I. & Craparo, E.M. & White, J.A., 2014. "Pricing Contracts Under Uncertainty in a Carbon Capture and Storage Framework," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 56-62.
    6. Olivier Massol & Stéphane Tchung-Ming, 2012. "Joining the CCS Club ! Insights from a Northwest European CO2 pipeline project," Working Papers hal-03206457, HAL.
    7. Lee, Jui-Yuan & Tan, Raymond R. & Chen, Cheng-Liang, 2014. "A unified model for the deployment of carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 140-148.
    8. Massol, Olivier & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane & Banal-Estañol, Albert, 2015. "Joining the CCS club! The economics of CO2 pipeline projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 259-275.
    9. Nicolle, Adrien & Massol, Olivier, 2023. "Build more and regret less: Oversizing H2 and CCS pipeline systems under uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Gregory Nemet & Erin Baker & Bob Barron & Samuel Harms, 2015. "Characterizing the effects of policy instruments on the future costs of carbon capture for coal power plants," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 155-168, November.
    11. Kemp, Alexander G. & Kasim, Sola, 2013. "The economics of CO2-EOR cluster developments in the UK Central North Sea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1344-1355.
    12. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Pao-Yu Oei and Roman Mendelevitch, 2016. "European Scenarios of CO2 Infrastructure Investment until 2050," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Sustainab).
    14. Qianlin Zhu & Chuang Wang & Zhihan Fan & Jing Ma & Fu Chen, 2019. "Optimal matching between CO2 sources in Jiangsu province and sinks in Subei‐Southern South Yellow Sea basin, China," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 95-105, February.
    15. Selosse, Sandrine & Ricci, Olivia & Maïzi, Nadia, 2013. "Fukushima's impact on the European power sector: The key role of CCS technologies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 305-312.
    16. Lee, Suh-Young & Lee, Jae-Uk & Lee, In-Beum & Han, Jeehoon, 2017. "Design under uncertainty of carbon capture and storage infrastructure considering cost, environmental impact, and preference on risk," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 725-738.
    17. Benjamin Court & Thomas Elliot & Joseph Dammel & Thomas Buscheck & Jeremy Rohmer & Michael Celia, 2012. "Promising synergies to address water, sequestration, legal, and public acceptance issues associated with large-scale implementation of CO 2 sequestration," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 569-599, August.
    18. Jeffrey M. Bielicki & Guillaume Calas & Richard S. Middleton & Minh Ha‐Duong, 2014. "National corridors for climate change mitigation: managing industrial CO 2 emissions in France," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(3), pages 262-277, June.
    19. Nemet, Gregory F. & Zipperer, Vera & Kraus, Martina, 2018. "The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 154-167.
    20. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:352-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.