IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v136y2014icp560-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlating variability of modeling parameters with non-isothermal stack performance: Monte Carlo simulation of a portable 3D planar solid oxide fuel cell stack

Author

Listed:
  • He, Zhongjie
  • Li, Hua
  • Birgersson, E.

Abstract

The development of fuel cells has progressed to portable applications recently. This paper conducts a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of a spatially-smoothed non-isothermal model to correlate the performance of a 3D 5-cell planar solid oxide fuel cell (P-SOFC) stack with the variability of modeling parameters regarding material and geometrical properties and operating conditions. The computationally cost-efficient P-SOFC model for the MCS captures the leading-order transport phenomena and electrochemical mechanics of the 3D stack. Sensitivity analysis is carried out in two scenarios: first, by varying modeling parameters individually, and second by varying them simultaneously. The stochastic parameters are ranked according to the strength of their correlations with global and local stack performances. As a result, different rankings are obtained for the two scenarios. Moreover, in the second scenario, the rankings change with the nominal values and variability of the stochastic parameters as well as local positions within the stack, because of compensating or reinforcing effects between the varying parameters. Apart from the P-SOFCs, the present MCS can be extended to other types of fuel cells equipped with parallel flow channels. The fast stack model allows statistical modeling of a large stack of hundreds of cells for high-power applications without a prohibitive computational cost.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Zhongjie & Li, Hua & Birgersson, E., 2014. "Correlating variability of modeling parameters with non-isothermal stack performance: Monte Carlo simulation of a portable 3D planar solid oxide fuel cell stack," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 560-575.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:560-575
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914010046
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Razbani, Omid & Wærnhus, Ivar & Assadi, Mohsen, 2013. "Experimental investigation of temperature distribution over a planar solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 155-160.
    2. He, Zhongjie & Birgersson, E. & Li, Hua, 2014. "Reduced non-isothermal model for the planar solid oxide fuel cell and stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 478-492.
    3. Andersson, Martin & Yuan, Jinliang & Sundén, Bengt, 2010. "Review on modeling development for multiscale chemical reactions coupled transport phenomena in solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1461-1476, May.
    4. Chen, Daifen & Zeng, Qice & Su, Shichuan & Bi, Wuxi & Ren, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Geometric optimization of a 10-cell modular planar solid oxide fuel cell stack manifold," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1100-1107.
    5. Calise, F. & Ferruzzi, G. & Vanoli, L., 2009. "Parametric exergy analysis of a tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) stack through finite-volume model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2401-2410, November.
    6. Yan, Min & Zeng, Min & Chen, Qiuyang & Wang, Qiuwang, 2012. "Numerical study on carbon deposition of SOFC with unsteady state variation of porosity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 754-762.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kannan, Vishvak & Xue, Hansong & Raman, K. Ashoke & Chen, Jiasheng & Fisher, Adrian & Birgersson, Erik, 2020. "Quantifying operating uncertainties of a PEMFC – Monte Carlo-machine learning based approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 343-359.
    2. He, Zhongjie & Li, Hua & Birgersson, E., 2016. "Correlating variability of modeling parameters with cell performance: Monte Carlo simulation of a quasi-3D planar solid oxide fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1301-1315.
    3. Cuneo, A. & Zaccaria, V. & Tucker, D. & Traverso, A., 2017. "Probabilistic analysis of a fuel cell degradation model for solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2277-2287.
    4. Ma, Rui & Liu, Chen & Breaz, Elena & Briois, Pascal & Gao, Fei, 2018. "Numerical stiffness study of multi-physical solid oxide fuel cell model for real-time simulation applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 570-581.
    5. Shao, Qian & Gao, Enlai & Mara, Thierry & Hu, Heng & Liu, Tong & Makradi, Ahmed, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis of solid oxide fuel cells with Bayesian sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Masri, A. & Peksen, M. & Blum, L. & Stolten, D., 2014. "A 3D CFD model for predicting the temperature distribution in a full scale APU SOFC short stack under transient operating conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 539-547.
    2. Chen, Daifen & Zeng, Qice & Su, Shichuan & Bi, Wuxi & Ren, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Geometric optimization of a 10-cell modular planar solid oxide fuel cell stack manifold," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1100-1107.
    3. Sorce, A. & Greco, A. & Magistri, L. & Costamagna, P., 2014. "FDI oriented modeling of an experimental SOFC system, model validation and simulation of faulty states," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 894-908.
    4. Pavelka, Michal & Klika, Václav & Vágner, Petr & Maršík, František, 2015. "Generalization of exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 158-172.
    5. Fardadi, Mahshid & McLarty, Dustin F. & Jabbari, Faryar, 2016. "Investigation of thermal control for different SOFC flow geometries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 43-55.
    6. Wang, Junye, 2015. "Theory and practice of flow field designs for fuel cell scaling-up: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 640-663.
    7. Wang, Baoxuan & Zhu, Jiang & Lin, Zijing, 2016. "A theoretical framework for multiphysics modeling of methane fueled solid oxide fuel cell and analysis of low steam methane reforming kinetics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Komatsu, Y. & Brus, G. & Kimijima, S. & Szmyd, J.S., 2014. "The effect of overpotentials on the transient response of the 300W SOFC cell stack voltage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 352-359.
    9. Razbani, Omid & Wærnhus, Ivar & Assadi, Mohsen, 2013. "Experimental investigation of temperature distribution over a planar solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 155-160.
    10. Silva-Mosqueda, Dulce María & Elizalde-Blancas, Francisco & Pumiglia, Davide & Santoni, Francesca & Boigues-Muñoz, Carlos & McPhail, Stephen J., 2019. "Intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell under internal reforming: Critical operating conditions, associated problems and their impact on the performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 625-640.
    11. Guk, Erdogan & Ranaweera, Manoj & Venkatesan, Vijay & Kim, Jung-Sik & Jung, WooChul, 2020. "In-situ temperature monitoring directly from cathode surface of an operating solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    12. Min Yan & Pei Fu & Qiuyang Chen & Qiuwang Wang & Min Zeng & Jaideep Pandit, 2014. "Electrical Performance and Carbon Deposition Differences between the Bi-Layer Interconnector and Conventional Straight Interconnector Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Ferrari, Mario L. & Pascenti, Matteo & Traverso, Alberto N. & Massardo, Aristide F., 2012. "Hybrid system test rig: Chemical composition emulation with steam injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 809-815.
    14. Lee, Sanghyeok & Park, Mansoo & Kim, Hyoungchul & Yoon, Kyung Joong & Son, Ji-Won & Lee, Jong-Ho & Kim, Byung-Kook & Choi, Wonjoon & Hong, Jongsup, 2017. "Thermal conditions and heat transfer characteristics of high-temperature solid oxide fuel cells investigated by three-dimensional numerical simulations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 293-305.
    15. Zaccaria, V. & Tucker, D. & Traverso, A., 2016. "Transfer function development for SOFC/GT hybrid systems control using cold air bypass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 695-706.
    16. Buonomano, Annamaria & Calise, Francesco & d’Accadia, Massimo Dentice & Palombo, Adolfo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2015. "Hybrid solid oxide fuel cells–gas turbine systems for combined heat and power: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 32-85.
    17. Ferrari, Mario L. & Massardo, Aristide F., 2013. "Cathode–anode side interaction in SOFC hybrid systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 369-379.
    18. Yan, Min & Zeng, Min & Chen, Qiuyang & Wang, Qiuwang, 2012. "Numerical study on carbon deposition of SOFC with unsteady state variation of porosity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 754-762.
    19. Terracciano, Anthony Carmine & Vasu, Subith S. & Orlovskaya, Nina, 2016. "Design and development of a porous heterogeneous combustor for efficient heat production by combustion of liquid and gaseous fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 228-236.
    20. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Libertini, Luigi & Quiriti, Edoardo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2017. "A novel tool for thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of trigeneration systems: A case study for a hospital building in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 64-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:560-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.