IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v115y2014icp549-558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interaction between iron-based oxygen carrier and four coal ashes during chemical looping combustion

Author

Listed:
  • Bao, Jinhua
  • Li, Zhenshan
  • Cai, Ningsheng

Abstract

Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is a novel technology with inherent CO2 capture, especially for solid fuels. The existence of ash in solid fuels is one major challenge for CLC technology development. In this work, interaction between an iron-based oxygen carrier and four different types of coal ash was studied in a laboratory-scale fluidized reactor. Different factors – the ash component, the redox cycle number, and the ash size – were taken into account. Chemical composition of the ash had effect on the reduction time from Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 in the fluidized bed. The presence of reactive components (such as Fe2O3 and CaSO4) in the ash, functioning as oxygen carriers, extended the reduction time. However, the chemical combination between the ash contents and the carrier can shorten the reduction time. The effect of ash on the carrier’s reactivity depended on the ash type. Most ashes decreased the reactivity of the carrier, except the ash mainly composed of CaSO4 which showed an increased reactivity due to the deposited reactive CaSO4. The effect of ash on decreasing the carrier’s reactivity increased with the cycles. Meanwhile, the larger ash (900–1000μm) corresponded to a higher CO conversion, and thus had less effect on the reactivity than the smaller ash (300–400μm). This occurrence can be attributed to the non-uniform solid–solid contact between the larger ash and the carrier. Sintering and agglomeration of the carrier particles occurred in the existence of most ashes, except the lignite ash enriched in CaO. Ash deposition and the formation of new compounds were detected. One common compound formed in the presence of SiO2-rich ash was Fe2SiO4, which has a low melt point (1170°C) and a low thermal conductivity with a greater adhesion. The physical ash deposition and the formation of Fe2SiO4 through chemical reactions were proposed to be the main reasons for the effect of ash on the carrier’s reactivity and the occurrence of sintering and agglomeration. The existence of ash not only has impact on the carrier’s reactivity, but also causes solid fluidization disturbances. More effort is deserved to put into the ash-related issue in solid fuel CLC.

Suggested Citation

  • Bao, Jinhua & Li, Zhenshan & Cai, Ningsheng, 2014. "Interaction between iron-based oxygen carrier and four coal ashes during chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 549-558.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:115:y:2014:i:c:p:549-558
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913008817
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ishida, M. & Zheng, D. & Akehata, T., 1987. "Evaluation of a chemical-looping-combustion power-generation system by graphic exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 147-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Yuan & Zhu, Lei, 2014. "Cost of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction in China’s iron and steel sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 603-616.
    2. Lin, Shen & Gu, Zhenhua & Zhu, Xing & Wei, Yonggang & Long, Yanhui & Yang, Kun & He, Fang & Wang, Hua & Li, Kongzhai, 2020. "Synergy of red mud oxygen carrier with MgO and NiO for enhanced chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Nandy, Anirban & Loha, Chanchal & Gu, Sai & Sarkar, Pinaki & Karmakar, Malay K. & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2016. "Present status and overview of Chemical Looping Combustion technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 597-619.
    4. Lee, Jaehee & Han, Sang-Jun & Wee, Jung-Ho, 2014. "Synthesis of dry sorbents for carbon dioxide capture using coal fly ash and its performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 40-47.
    5. Huang, Liang & Tang, Mingchen & Fan, Maohong & Cheng, Hansong, 2015. "Density functional theory study on the reaction between hematite and methane during chemical looping process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 132-144.
    6. Schneider, T. & Moffitt, J. & Volz, N. & Müller, D. & Karl, J., 2022. "Long-term effects of ilmenite on a micro-scale bubbling fluidized bed combined heat and power pilot plant for oxygen carrier aided combustion of wood," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Hua, Xiuning & Fan, Yiran & Wang, Yidi & Fu, Tiantian & Fowler, G.D. & Zhao, Dongmei & Wang, Wei, 2017. "The behaviour of multiple reaction fronts during iron (III) oxide reduction in a non-steady state packed bed for chemical looping water splitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 96-111.
    8. Shuai Zhang & Rui Xiao, 2018. "Comparison of pyrite cinder with synthetic and natural iron†based oxygen carriers in coal†fueled chemical†looping combustion," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 106-119, February.
    9. Huang, Xin & Fan, Maohong & Wang, Xingjun & Wang, Yonggang & Argyle, Morris D. & Zhu, Yufei, 2018. "A cost-effective approach to realization of the efficient methane chemical-looping combustion by using coal fly ash as a support for oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 393-402.
    10. Tian, Xin & Zhao, Haibo & Ma, Jinchen, 2017. "Cement bonded fine hematite and copper ore particles as oxygen carrier in chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 242-253.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    2. Medrano, J.A. & Potdar, I. & Melendez, J. & Spallina, V. & Pacheco-Tanaka, D.A. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2018. "The membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming concept for efficient H2 production with inherent CO2 capture: Experimental demonstration and model validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 75-86.
    3. Hsieh, Tien-Lin & Xu, Dikai & Zhang, Yitao & Nadgouda, Sourabh & Wang, Dawei & Chung, Cheng & Pottimurphy, Yaswanth & Guo, Mengqing & Chen, Yu-Yen & Xu, Mingyuan & He, Pengfei & Fan, Liang-Shih & Tong, 2018. "250 kWth high pressure pilot demonstration of the syngas chemical looping system for high purity H2 production with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1660-1672.
    4. Meng, William X. & Banerjee, Subhodeep & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2015. "Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1869-1877.
    5. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    6. Nandy, Anirban & Loha, Chanchal & Gu, Sai & Sarkar, Pinaki & Karmakar, Malay K. & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2016. "Present status and overview of Chemical Looping Combustion technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 597-619.
    7. Wang, Xiaoyu & Su, Mingze & Zhao, Haibo, 2021. "Process design and exergy cost analysis of a chemical looping ammonia generation system using AlN/Al2O3 as a nitrogen carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Carlos Arnaiz del Pozo & Ángel Jiménez Álvaro & Jan Hendrik Cloete & Schalk Cloete & Shahriar Amini, 2020. "Exergy Analysis of Gas Switching Chemical Looping IGCC Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Khakpoor, Nima & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader & De la Hoz Siegler, Hector, 2019. "Oxygen transport capacity and kinetic study of ilmenite ores for methane chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 329-337.
    10. Zhang, Jinzhi & He, Tao & Wang, Zhiqi & Zhu, Min & Zhang, Ke & Li, Bin & Wu, Jinhu, 2017. "The search of proper oxygen carriers for chemical looping partial oxidation of carbon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1119-1125.
    11. Medrano, J.A. & Hamers, H.P. & Williams, G. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2015. "NiO/CaAl2O4 as active oxygen carrier for low temperature chemical looping applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 86-96.
    12. Penthor, Stefan & Zerobin, Florian & Mayer, Karl & Pröll, Tobias & Hofbauer, Hermann, 2015. "Investigation of the performance of a copper based oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion in a 120kW pilot plant for gaseous fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 52-59.
    13. Ströhle, Jochen & Orth, Matthias & Epple, Bernd, 2014. "Design and operation of a 1MWth chemical looping plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1490-1495.
    14. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & He, Song, 2023. "Analysis of the mechanism of energy consumption for CO2 capture in a power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    15. Chung, Cheng & Pottimurthy, Yaswanth & Xu, Mingyuan & Hsieh, Tien-Lin & Xu, Dikai & Zhang, Yitao & Chen, Yu-Yen & He, Pengfei & Pickarts, Marshall & Fan, Liang-Shih & Tong, Andrew, 2017. "Fate of sulfur in coal-direct chemical looping systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 678-690.
    16. Bischi, Aldo & Langørgen, Øyvind & Morin, Jean-Xavier & Bakken, Jørn & Ghorbaniyan, Masoud & Bysveen, Marie & Bolland, Olav, 2012. "Hydrodynamic viability of chemical looping processes by means of cold flow model investigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 201-216.
    17. Florian Lebendig & Ibai Funcia & Rául Pérez-Vega & Michael Müller, 2022. "Investigations on the Effect of Pre-Treatment of Wheat Straw on Ash-Related Issues in Chemical Looping Gasification (CLG) in Comparison with Woody Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Shareq Mohd Nazir & Olav Bolland & Shahriar Amini, 2018. "Analysis of Combined Cycle Power Plants with Chemical Looping Reforming of Natural Gas and Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    19. García Kerdan, Iván & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2020. "Artificial neural network structure optimisation for accurately prediction of exergy, comfort and life cycle cost performance of a low energy building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    20. Nazir, Shareq Mohd & Cloete, Jan Hendrik & Cloete, Schalk & Amini, Shahriar, 2019. "Gas switching reforming (GSR) for power generation with CO2 capture: Process efficiency improvement studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 757-765.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:115:y:2014:i:c:p:549-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.