IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v6y2016i5p648-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic modeling of the CO 2 transportation phase and its application to the Duero Basin, Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Bernardo Llamas
  • Álvaro Hernández
  • Luis Felipe Mazadiego
  • Juan Pous

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage is a viable option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Although capture and geological storage of CO 2 are the major forms of research, CO 2 transportation should be also considered in the entire chain. There are still some issues that require a more accurate definition, especially in economic aspects. In this study, we explore concepts such as the uses of a storage structure for a single source with, for instance, an individual transportation line, and the use of a centralized model using a geological structure for several co 2 emitters. This model has been applied in a given region of Spain, in order to determine the maximum distance between the sources and the potential areas for storing CO 2 , using a geographical information system to evaluate the data. Moreover, sensitive analysis was performed in order to provide a better understanding of the economical implications of CO 2 transportation. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Bernardo Llamas & Álvaro Hernández & Luis Felipe Mazadiego & Juan Pous, 2016. "Economic modeling of the CO 2 transportation phase and its application to the Duero Basin, Spain," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 648-661, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:648-661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1602
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akbilgic, Oguz & Doluweera, Ganesh & Mahmoudkhani, Maryam & Bergerson, Joule, 2015. "A meta-analysis of carbon capture and storage technology assessments: Understanding the driving factors of variability in cost estimates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 11-18.
    2. Eccles, Jordan K. & Pratson, Lincoln, 2014. "A “carbonshed” assessment of small- vs. large-scale CCS deployment in the continental US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 352-361.
    3. Gustavsson, Leif & Eriksson, Lisa & Sathre, Roger, 2011. "Costs and CO2 benefits of recovering, refining and transporting logging residues for fossil fuel replacement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 192-197, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    2. Gustavsson, Leif & Haus, Sylvia & Lundblad, Mattias & Lundström, Anders & Ortiz, Carina A. & Sathre, Roger & Truong, Nguyen Le & Wikberg, Per-Erik, 2017. "Climate change effects of forestry and substitution of carbon-intensive materials and fossil fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 612-624.
    3. Maria Pergola & Angelo Rita & Alfonso Tortora & Maria Castellaneta & Marco Borghetti & Antonio Sergio De Franchi & Antonio Lapolla & Nicola Moretti & Giovanni Pecora & Domenico Pierangeli & Luigi Toda, 2020. "Identification of Suitable Areas for Biomass Power Plant Construction through Environmental Impact Assessment of Forest Harvesting Residues Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Murphy, Fionnuala & Devlin, Ger & McDonnell, Kevin, 2014. "Forest biomass supply chains in Ireland: A life cycle assessment of GHG emissions and primary energy balances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Rui, Zhenhua & Ezekiel, Justin & Zhang, Liang & Wang, Hongsheng, 2018. "The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 49-63.
    6. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Sergey Fedoseev & Pavel Tcvetkov & Ksenia Sidorova & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2018. "Potential of Russian Regions to Implement CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    7. van Beek, Andries & Groote Schaarsberg, Mirjam & Borm, Peter & Hamers, Herbert & Veneman, Mattijs, 2023. "Cost Allocation in CO2 Transport for CCUS Hubs : A Multi-Actor Perspective," Discussion Paper 2023-008, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Joelsson, Jonas M. & Gustavsson, Leif, 2012. "Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and oil use by DME (di-methyl ether) and FT (Fischer-Tropsch) diesel production in chemical pulp mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 363-374.
    9. Gustavsson, L. & Nguyen, T. & Sathre, R. & Tettey, U.Y.A., 2021. "Climate effects of forestry and substitution of concrete buildings and fossil energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Jäppinen, Eero & Korpinen, Olli-Jussi & Laitila, Juha & Ranta, Tapio, 2014. "Greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 369-382.
    11. Bagheri, Mehdi & Guevara, Zeus & Alikarami, Mohammad & Kennedy, Christopher A. & Doluweera, Ganesh, 2018. "Green growth planning: A multi-factor energy input-output analysis of the Canadian economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 708-720.
    12. Putta, Koteswara Rao & Tobiesen, Finn Andrew & Svendsen, Hallvard F. & Knuutila, Hanna K., 2017. "Applicability of enhancement factor models for CO2 absorption into aqueous MEA solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 765-783.
    13. Ewa Knapik & Katarzyna Chruszcz-Lipska, 2020. "Chemistry of Reservoir Fluids in the Aspect of CO 2 Injection for Selected Oil Reservoirs in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Billig, E. & Thraen, D., 2017. "Renewable methane – A technology evaluation by multi-criteria decision making from a European perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 468-484.
    15. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    16. Gustavsson, Leif & Haus, Sylvia & Ortiz, Carina A. & Sathre, Roger & Truong, Nguyen Le, 2015. "Climate effects of bioenergy from forest residues in comparison to fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 36-50.
    17. van Beek, Andries & Groote Schaarsberg, Mirjam & Borm, Peter & Hamers, Herbert & Veneman, Mattijs, 2023. "Cost Allocation in CO2 Transport for CCUS Hubs : A Multi-Actor Perspective," Other publications TiSEM 4f99c444-6676-4887-b7b8-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Chul-Yong & Kim, Hongbum, 2016. "Technology and demand forecasting for carbon capture and storage technology in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-11.
    19. van Beek, Andries, 2023. "Solutions in multi-actor projects with collaboration and strategic incentives," Other publications TiSEM 3739c498-5edb-442f-87d8-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Sascha Samadi, 2017. "The Social Costs of Electricity Generation—Categorising Different Types of Costs and Evaluating Their Respective Relevance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-37, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:648-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.