IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v440y2023ics0096300322007007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The superiorization method with restarted perturbations for split minimization problems with an application to radiotherapy treatment planning

Author

Listed:
  • Aragón-Artacho, Francisco J.
  • Censor, Yair
  • Gibali, Aviv
  • Torregrosa-Belén, David

Abstract

In this paper we study the split minimization problem that consists of two constrained minimization problems in two separate spaces that are connected via a linear operator that maps one space into the other. To handle the data of such a problem we develop a superiorization approach that can reach a feasible point with reduced (not necessarily minimal) objective function values. The superiorization methodology is based on interlacing the iterative steps of two separate and independent iterative processes by perturbing the iterates of one process according to the steps dictated by the other process. We include in our developed method two novel elements. The first one is the permission to restart the perturbations in the superiorized algorithm which results in a significant acceleration and increases the computational efficiency. The second element is the ability to independently superiorize subvectors. This caters to the needs of real-world applications, as demonstrated here for a problem in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Aragón-Artacho, Francisco J. & Censor, Yair & Gibali, Aviv & Torregrosa-Belén, David, 2023. "The superiorization method with restarted perturbations for split minimization problems with an application to radiotherapy treatment planning," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:440:y:2023:i:c:s0096300322007007
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300322007007
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco J. Aragón Artacho & Rubén Campoy, 2018. "A new projection method for finding the closest point in the intersection of convex sets," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 99-132, January.
    2. Yair Censor & Ran Davidi & Gabor T. Herman & Reinhard W. Schulte & Luba Tetruashvili, 2014. "Projected Subgradient Minimization Versus Superiorization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 730-747, March.
    3. Simeon Reich & Truong Minh Tuyen, 2021. "Projection Algorithms for Solving the Split Feasibility Problem with Multiple Output Sets," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 861-878, September.
    4. Yair Censor & Alexander J. Zaslavski, 2015. "Strict Fejér Monotonicity by Superiorization of Feasibility-Seeking Projection Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 172-187, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanni Guo & Xiaozhi Zhao, 2019. "Bounded Perturbation Resilience and Superiorization of Proximal Scaled Gradient Algorithm with Multi-Parameters," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Kaiwen Ma & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Sreekanth Rajagopalan & Satyajith Amaran & Scott J Bury, 2021. "Decomposition in derivative-free optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 269-292, October.
    3. Q. L. Dong & J. Z. Huang & X. H. Li & Y. J. Cho & Th. M. Rassias, 2019. "MiKM: multi-step inertial Krasnosel’skiǐ–Mann algorithm and its applications," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 801-824, April.
    4. Francisco J. Aragón Artacho & Rubén Campoy & Matthew K. Tam, 2021. "Strengthened splitting methods for computing resolvents," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 549-585, November.
    5. Francisco J. Aragón Artacho & Rubén Campoy & Matthew K. Tam, 2020. "The Douglas–Rachford algorithm for convex and nonconvex feasibility problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(2), pages 201-240, April.
    6. Dongying Wang & Xianfu Wang, 2019. "A parameterized Douglas–Rachford algorithm," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 839-869, July.
    7. Bian, Fengmiao & Zhang, Xiaoqun, 2021. "A parameterized Douglas–Rachford splitting algorithm for nonconvex optimization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 410(C).
    8. Francisco J. Aragón Artacho & Rubén Campoy, 2019. "Computing the Resolvent of the Sum of Maximally Monotone Operators with the Averaged Alternating Modified Reflections Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 709-726, June.
    9. Chin How Jeffrey Pang, 2019. "Dykstra’s Splitting and an Approximate Proximal Point Algorithm for Minimizing the Sum of Convex Functions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 1019-1049, September.
    10. Yixuan Yang & Yuchao Tang & Chuanxi Zhu, 2019. "Iterative Methods for Computing the Resolvent of Composed Operators in Hilbert Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Wenma Jin & Yair Censor & Ming Jiang, 2016. "Bounded perturbation resilience of projected scaled gradient methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 365-392, March.
    12. Yair Censor & Alexander J. Zaslavski, 2015. "Strict Fejér Monotonicity by Superiorization of Feasibility-Seeking Projection Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 172-187, April.
    13. Rubén Campoy, 2022. "A product space reformulation with reduced dimension for splitting algorithms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 319-348, September.
    14. Alexander J. Zaslavski, 2023. "Superiorization with a Projected Subgradient Algorithm on the Solution Sets of Common Fixed Point Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:440:y:2023:i:c:s0096300322007007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.