IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/anture/v83y2020ics0160738320300712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responses to replica (vs. genuine) touristic experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Sarial-Abi, Gülen
  • Merdin-Uygur, Ezgi
  • Gürhan-Canli, Zeynep

Abstract

A growing trend in tourism is the use of replica experiences. Yet, consumers' responses to replica (vs. genuine) touristic experiences are mostly overlooked in the literature. In this paper, we propose that consumers' perceptions of authenticity of the replica (vs. genuine) touristic experiences mediate their responses to these experiences. We define three theoretically driven factors that influence the authenticity perceptions of consumers—experience characteristics (restricted experience vs. not restricted experience; within close vs. distant geographical proximity to the genuine) and a consumer characteristic (salient goal: collecting experiences vs. having fun/pleasure), which influence consumers' responses to replica and genuine touristic experiences. We found support for the proposed theory using two field studies from Egypt's Luxor Tutankhamun tomb and three experimental studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarial-Abi, Gülen & Merdin-Uygur, Ezgi & Gürhan-Canli, Zeynep, 2020. "Responses to replica (vs. genuine) touristic experiences," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:83:y:2020:i:c:s0160738320300712
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738320300712
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carter, Perry Labron, 2019. "Looking for something real: Affective encounters," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 200-213.
    2. Michael B. Beverland & Francis J. Farrelly, 2010. "The Quest for Authenticity in Consumption: Consumers' Purposive Choice of Authentic Cues to Shape Experienced Outcomes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 838-856, February.
    3. Veronique Cova & Bernard Cova, 2019. "Experience copycats: the Compostela case," Post-Print hal-02062185, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moore, Kevin & Buchmann, Annæ & Månsson, Maria & Fisher, David, 2021. "Authenticity in tourism theory and experience. Practically indispensable and theoretically mischievous?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Su, Lujun & Tang, Binli & Nawijn, Jeroen, 2021. "How tourism activity shapes travel experience sharing: Tourist well-being and social context," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    2. Eigenraam, Anniek W. & Eelen, Jiska & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2021. "Let Me Entertain You? The Importance of Authenticity in Online Customer Engagement," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-68.
    3. Manuel Alonso-Dos-Santos & Carmen Zarco & Sardar Mohammadi & Daniela Niño-Amézquita, 2024. "Sponsorship effectiveness on betting intention-unobserved segmentation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Rickly, Jillian M., 2022. "A review of authenticity research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Jonathan Dezecot & Nathalie Fleck, 2017. "D'artisan traditionnel à marque artisan : quelle perception de l'artisan par le consommateur ?," Post-Print halshs-02952967, HAL.
    6. Julie Guidry Moulard & Randle D. Raggio & Judith Anne Garretson Folse, 2021. "Disentangling the meanings of brand authenticity: The entity-referent correspondence framework of authenticity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 96-118, January.
    7. Osorio, María Lucila & Centeno-Velázquez, Edgar & López-Pérez, María Eugenia & del Castillo, Ernesto, 2021. "Authenticity, fit and product type: Testing a celebrity brand extension model cross-culturally," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Thomas Streifeneder & Christian Hoffmann & Philipp Corradini, 2023. "The future of agritourism? A review of current trends of touristic commercialisation in rural areas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 93-119, August.
    9. Hu, Miao & Chen, Jie & Chen, Qimei & He, Wei, 2020. "It pays off to be authentic: An examination of direct versus indirect brand mentions on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 19-28.
    10. Castéran, Herbert & Roederer, Claire, 2013. "Does authenticity really affect behavior? The case of the Strasbourg Christmas Market," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 153-163.
    11. Chetan Sharma & Damir D. Torrico & Lloyd Carpenter & Roland Harrison, 2021. "Indigenous Meanings of Provenance in the Context of Alternative Food Movements and Supply-Chain Traceability: A Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Pilar Rojas Gaviria, 2012. "Three essays on how sharing and consuming support home place reconnection in contemporary liquid times," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/209597, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Bian, Xuemei & Wang, Kai-Yu & Smith, Andrew & Yannopoulou, Natalia, 2016. "New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4249-4258.
    14. Amélie Guèvremont & Bianca Grohmann, 2018. "Does brand authenticity alleviate the effect of brand scandals?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 322-336, July.
    15. Pelet, Jean-Éric & Durrieu, François & Lick, Erhard, 2020. "Label design of wines sold online: Effects of perceived authenticity on purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    16. Alain Debenedetti & Harmen Oppewal & Zeynep Arsel, 2014. "Place Attachment in Commercial Settings: A Gift Economy Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(5), pages 904-923.
    17. Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Shahzad, Mohsin & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Shahzad, Khuram, 2023. "Forecasting impulsive consumers driven by macro-influencers posts: Intervention of followers' flow state and perceived informativeness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    18. Andonopoulos, Vasiliki & Lee, Jenny (Jiyeon) & Mathies, Christine, 2023. "Authentic isn't always best: When inauthentic social media influencers induce positive consumer purchase intention through inspiration," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Bassam Dalal & Ahmad Aljarah, 2021. "How Brand Symbolism, Perceived Service Quality, and CSR Skepticism Influence Consumers to Engage in Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Daina Mazutis & Natalie Slawinski, 2015. "Reconnecting Business and Society: Perceptions of Authenticity in Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 137-150, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:83:y:2020:i:c:s0160738320300712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-tourism-research/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.