IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v98y2010i2p261-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using vegetation indices from satellite remote sensing to assess corn and soybean response to controlled tile drainage

Author

Listed:
  • Cicek, H.
  • Sunohara, M.
  • Wilkes, G.
  • McNairn, H.
  • Pick, F.
  • Topp, E.
  • Lapen, D.R.

Abstract

Controlled tile drainage (CTD) is a management practice designed to retain water and nutrients in the field for crop use. CTD has shown promise for improving water quality and augmenting crop yields but findings are often restricted to field and plot scales. Remote sensing is one of the alternatives to evaluate crop responsiveness to CTD at large spatial scales. This study compared normalized and green normalized difference vegetation indices (NDVI and GNDVI) for corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) among CTD and uncontrolled tile drainage (UCTD) fields in a ~950 ha experimental watershed setting in Ontario, Canada from 2005 to 2008. The indices were derived from Landsat-5 and SPOT-4 satellite imagery. Log-transformed NDVI and GNDVI for soybean (R3-R6 growth stage) and corn (VT to R5-R6 growth stage) crops were higher significantly (p  CTD). Log-transformed NDVI and GNDVI standard errors for CTD, relative to UCTD fields, were lower for 65% of the significant corn and 71% of the significant soybean NDVI and GNDVI comparisons for the growth stages noted above. This finding suggested overall more uniform crop growth for CTD fields relative to UCTD fields. Observed yields from a subset of commonly managed CTD and UCTD fields in the study area were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05) with respect to tile drainage management practice; however, 87% of these paired yield comparisons indicated that CTD mean corn/soybean grain yields were greater than or equal to those for UCTD. On average, CTD observed corn and soybean grain yields were 3% and 4%, respectively, greater than those from UCTD. From observed yield and NDVI and GNDVI observations, vegetation indices vs. yield linear regression models were developed to predict grain yields over a broader land base in the experimental watershed area. Here, predicted mean yields were 0.1-11% higher for CTD corn and -5% to 4% higher for CTD soybean, relative to UCTD crops; but results varied between manured and non-manured fertilizer practices. Eighty-nine percent of the standard deviations for these yield predictions were lower for CTD relative to UCTD. The results of this study indicate that at a minimum, CTD did not adversely impact corn and soybean grain yields over the time span and field environments of the study, and based on the weight of evidence presented here, CTD shows general promise for augmenting crop performance. Finally, remote sensing derived vegetation indices such as NDVI and GNDVI can be used to assess the impact of agricultural drainage management practices on crop response and production properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Cicek, H. & Sunohara, M. & Wilkes, G. & McNairn, H. & Pick, F. & Topp, E. & Lapen, D.R., 2010. "Using vegetation indices from satellite remote sensing to assess corn and soybean response to controlled tile drainage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 261-270, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2010:i:2:p:261-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00286-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mejia, M. N. & Madramootoo, C. A. & Broughton, R. S., 2000. "Influence of water table management on corn and soybean yields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 73-89, November.
    2. Wesstrom, Ingrid & Messing, Ingmar, 2007. "Effects of controlled drainage on N and P losses and N dynamics in a loamy sand with spring crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 229-240, February.
    3. Lalonde, V. & Madramootoo, C. A. & Trenholm, L. & Broughton, R. S., 1996. "Effects of controlled drainage on nitrate concentrations in subsurface drain discharge," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 187-199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kross, Angela & Lapen, David R. & McNairn, Heather & Sunohara, Mark & Champagne, Catherine & Wilkes, Graham, 2015. "Satellite and in situ derived corn and soybean biomass and leaf area index: Response to controlled tile drainage under varying weather conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 118-131.
    2. Ekwunife, Kosoluchukwu C. & Madramootoo, Chandra A., 2023. "Influence of seasonal climate and water table management on corn yield and nitrous oxide emissions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Changwei Tan & Xinxing Zhou & Pengpeng Zhang & Zhixiang Wang & Dunliang Wang & Wenshan Guo & Fei Yun, 2020. "Predicting grain protein content of field-grown winter wheat with satellite images and partial least square algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Yuki Hamada & Colleen R. Zumpf & Jules F. Cacho & DoKyoung Lee & Cheng-Hsien Lin & Arvid Boe & Emily Heaton & Robert Mitchell & Maria Cristina Negri, 2021. "Remote Sensing-Based Estimation of Advanced Perennial Grass Biomass Yields for Bioenergy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Van Zandvoort, Alisha & Clark, Ian D. & Flemming, Corey & Craiovan, Emilia & Sunohara, Mark D. & Gottschall, Natalie & Boutz, Ronda & Lapen, David R., 2017. "Using 13C isotopic analysis to assess soil carbon pools associated with tile drainage management during drier and wetter growing seasons," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 232-243.
    6. Youssef, Mohamed A. & Strock, Jeffrey & Bagheri, Ehsan & Reinhart, Benjamin D. & Abendroth, Lori J. & Chighladze, Giorgi & Ghane, Ehsan & Shedekar, Vinayak & Fausey (Ret.), Norman R. & Frankenberger, , 2023. "Impact of controlled drainage on corn yield under varying precipitation patterns: A synthesis of studies across the U.S. Midwest and Southeast," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jouni, Hamidreza Javani & Liaghat, Abdolmajid & Hassanoghli, Alireza & Henk, Ritzema, 2018. "Managing controlled drainage in irrigated farmers’ fields: A case study in the Moghan plain, Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 393-405.
    2. Salazar, Osvaldo & Wesström, Ingrid & Youssef, Mohamed A. & Skaggs, R. Wayne & Joel, Abraham, 2009. "Evaluation of the DRAINMOD-N II model for predicting nitrogen losses in a loamy sand under cultivation in south-east Sweden," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 267-281, February.
    3. Bohne, B. & Storchenegger, I.J. & Widmoser, P., 2012. "An easy to use calculation method for weir operations in controlled drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 46-53.
    4. Shokrana, Md Sami Bin & Ghane, Ehsan & Abdalaal, Yousef & Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan, 2023. "Predicting the effect of weir management on the discharge of a controlled drainage system in a changing climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    5. Gunn, Kpoti M. & Fausey, Norman R. & Shang, Yuhui & Shedekar, Vinayak S. & Ghane, Ehsan & Wahl, Mark D. & Brown, Larry C., 2015. "Subsurface drainage volume reduction with drainage water management: Case studies in Ohio, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 131-142.
    6. Kröger, R. & Cooper, C.M. & Moore, M.T., 2008. "A preliminary study of an alternative controlled drainage strategy in surface drainage ditches: Low-grade weirs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 678-684, June.
    7. Van Zandvoort, Alisha & Clark, Ian D. & Flemming, Corey & Craiovan, Emilia & Sunohara, Mark D. & Gottschall, Natalie & Boutz, Ronda & Lapen, David R., 2017. "Using 13C isotopic analysis to assess soil carbon pools associated with tile drainage management during drier and wetter growing seasons," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 232-243.
    8. He, Yupu & Jianyun, Zhang & Shihong, Yang & Dalin, Hong & Junzeng, Xu, 2019. "Effect of controlled drainage on nitrogen losses from controlled irrigation paddy fields through subsurface drainage and ammonia volatilization after fertilization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 231-237.
    9. Tolomio, Massimo & Borin, Maurizio, 2018. "Water table management to save water and reduce nutrient losses from agricultural fields: 6 years of experience in North-Eastern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Williams, M.R. & King, K.W. & Fausey, N.R., 2015. "Drainage water management effects on tile discharge and water quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 43-51.
    11. Littlejohn, K.A. & Poganski, B.H. & Kröger, R. & Ramirez-Avila, J.J., 2014. "Effectiveness of low-grade weirs for nutrient removal in an agricultural landscape in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 79-86.
    12. Sunohara, Mark D. & Gottschall, Natalie & Craiovan, Emilia & Wilkes, Graham & Topp, Edward & Frey, Steven K. & Lapen, David R., 2016. "Controlling tile drainage during the growing season in Eastern Canada to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus, and bacteria loading to surface water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 159-170.
    13. El-Ghannam, Mohamed K. & Aiad, Mahmoud. A. & Abdallah, Ahmed M., 2021. "Irrigation efficiency, drain outflow and yield responses to drain depth in the Nile delta clay soil, Egypt," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. Wang, Zhiyu & Shao, Guangcheng & Lu, Jia & Zhang, Kun & Gao, Yang & Ding, Jihui, 2020. "Effects of controlled drainage on crop yield, drainage water quantity and quality: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Ross, Jared A. & Herbert, Matthew E. & Sowa, Scott P. & Frankenberger, Jane R. & King, Kevin W. & Christopher, Sheila F. & Tank, Jennifer L. & Arnold, Jeffrey G. & White, Mike J. & Yen, Haw, 2016. "A synthesis and comparative evaluation of factors influencing the effectiveness of drainage water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 366-376.
    16. Wesstrom, Ingrid & Messing, Ingmar & Linner, Harry & Lindstrom, Jan, 2001. "Controlled drainage -- effects on drain outflow and water quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 85-100, March.
    17. Bou Lahdou, Guy & Bowling, Laura & Frankenberger, Jane & Kladivko, Eileen, 2019. "Hydrologic controls of controlled and free draining subsurface drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 605-615.
    18. Lavaire, Tito & Gentry, Lowell E. & David, Mark B. & Cooke, Richard A., 2017. "Fate of water and nitrate using drainage water management on tile systems in east-central Illinois," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 218-228.
    19. Sanchez Valero, Caroline & Madramootoo, Chandra A. & Stampfli, Nicolas, 2007. "Water table management impacts on phosphorus loads in tile drainage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 71-80, April.
    20. Kichul Jung & Myoung-Jin Um & Momcilo Markus & Daeryong Park, 2020. "Comparison of Long Short-Term Memory and Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Models for Nitrate-N Load Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2010:i:2:p:261-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.