IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v301y2024ics0378377424002592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating crop evapotranspiration of wheat-maize rotation system using hybrid convolutional bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory network with grey wolf algorithm in Chinese Loess Plateau region

Author

Listed:
  • Dong, Juan
  • Zhu, Yuanjun
  • Cui, Ningbo
  • Jia, Xiaoxu
  • Guo, Li
  • Qiu, Rangjian
  • Shao, Ming’an

Abstract

Accurate estimation of crop evapotranspiration (ET) is essential for the efficient utilization of agricultural water resources, crop production enhancement, and sustainable agricultural development. However, direct measurement of ET is highly expensive, intricate, and time-consuming, highlighting the imperative of establishing a novel model to accurately estimate ET in agricultural ecosystems. To address the above problems, this study proposed a novel model (GWA-CNN-BiLSTM), which incorporates Grey Wolf Algorithm (GWA), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory network (BiLSTM) as a hyperparameter adjuster, feature extractor, and regression component, respectively, to estimate ET built upon various input combinations comprising net solar radiation (Rn), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), average air temperature (Ta), soil water content (SWC), and leaf area index (LAI) about winter wheat-spring maize rotation system during 2012–2020 in the Loess Plateau. Besides, following a comparative assessment within GWA-CNN-BiLSTM, Convolutional Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory network (CNN-BiLSTM), BiLSTM, Long Short-Term Memory network (LSTM), and Shuttleworth-Wallace (SW) models, the results revealed that GWA-CNN-BiLSTM under varied inputs obtained the superior performance, ranging from 0.562 to 0.957 in determination coefficient (R2), 8.4–41.5 % in relative root mean square error (RRMSE), 0.349 mm d−1 to 1.521 mm d−1 in mean absolute error (MAE), −3.26 % to 14.11 % in percent bias (PBIAS), and 0.820–1.091 in regression coefficient (b0), respectively. Moreover, while the accuracy of BiLSTM over LSTM was evident, its performance was notably improved by the incorporation of the CNN module. Additionally, LSTM-type models under complete input combination present better precision than SW by 29.7−51.4 % in R2, 44.2−76.1 % in RRMSE, and 33.6−63.4 % in MAE, respectively. Furthermore, the accuracy of all models under varied inputs exhibited excellence in winter wheat compared to spring maize, and corresponding improvements ranged 1.4−4.3 % in R2, 5.1−20.1 % in RRMSE, and 3.1−17.9 % in MAE, respectively. Besides, the meteorological factors (Rn, VPD, Ta) proved to be the most important inputs for ET estimation in winter wheat and spring maize. Wherein the importance of SWC exceeded that of LAI in winter wheat, while the opposite trend was observed in spring maize. In brief, GWA-CNN-BiLSTM is the highly recommended model to estimate ET of winter wheat-spring maize rotation system under diverse input data scenarios in the Loess Plateau, which can facilitate to offer valuable assistance in regional agriculture water management decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong, Juan & Zhu, Yuanjun & Cui, Ningbo & Jia, Xiaoxu & Guo, Li & Qiu, Rangjian & Shao, Ming’an, 2024. "Estimating crop evapotranspiration of wheat-maize rotation system using hybrid convolutional bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory network with grey wolf algorithm in Chinese Loess Plateau region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424002592
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424002592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.