IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v295y2024ics0378377424000908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing actual evapotranspiration simulation to identify evapotranspiration partitioning variations: A fusion of physical processes and machine learning techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Xiaoman
  • Wang, Yuntao
  • A., Yinglan
  • Wang, Guoqiang
  • Zhang, Xiaojing
  • Ma, Guangwen
  • Duan, Limin
  • Liu, Kai

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) serves as a pivotal metric for studying ecohydrological processes. Its dynamics are intricately linked to the interplay among water balance, energy balance, and land use. However, the precise estimation of ET at a regional scale, coupled with a comprehensive understanding of its response to changes in water, heat, and vegetation factors, presents an ongoing challenge. In this study, we assessed the necessity to refine soil evaporation simulations in arid and semiarid regions. Subsequently, we introduced the random forest algorithm to optimize the soil evaporation module of the Priestley-Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL) model to enable a more accurate prediction of ET. Then, we quantitatively explored the correlation between ET and pertinent factors, such as soil moisture, solar radiation, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River Basin (IMSYRB), which is a typical arid and semiarid region. The findings underscore that soil evaporation is the predominant constituent of ET in the IMSYRB. Moreover, soil moisture, as opposed to relative humidity, better represent the near-surface moisture conditions within the study area. The refined model (PT-JPL-RF) exhibited enhanced simulation performance at both individual stations and in the overall region for ET. Furthermore, the application of the PT-JPL-RF model for scrutinizing the spatiotemporal ET variations in the study area revealed an average ET of 250 mm over the past four decades. Since 1982, a fluctuating upward trend of 0.99 mm/year has been observed. Spatially, ET exhibits an eastward distribution, with elevated values in the eastern sectors compared to those in the western regions, particularly in the Big Black River Basin (296 mm). Vegetation was the primary factor influencing ET variations in the IMSYRB, contributing to an annual increase by 1.58 mm. These findings demonstrate the benefits of integrating machine learning algorithms with physical models and provide a practical example for accurately simulating and predicting ET across diverse regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Xiaoman & Wang, Yuntao & A., Yinglan & Wang, Guoqiang & Zhang, Xiaojing & Ma, Guangwen & Duan, Limin & Liu, Kai, 2024. "Optimizing actual evapotranspiration simulation to identify evapotranspiration partitioning variations: A fusion of physical processes and machine learning techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000908
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424000908
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Granata, Francesco, 2019. "Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms—A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 303-315.
    2. Markus Reichstein & Gustau Camps-Valls & Bjorn Stevens & Martin Jung & Joachim Denzler & Nuno Carvalhais & Prabhat, 2019. "Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science," Nature, Nature, vol. 566(7743), pages 195-204, February.
    3. Meyer, Hanna & Reudenbach, Christoph & Wöllauer, Stephan & Nauss, Thomas, 2019. "Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications – Moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    4. Akash Koppa & Dominik Rains & Petra Hulsman & Rafael Poyatos & Diego G. Miralles, 2022. "A deep learning-based hybrid model of global terrestrial evaporation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Lan, Xinyao & Jin, Jiahui & Xu, Beibei & Chen, Diyi & Egusquiza, Mònica & Kim, Jin-Hyuk & Egusquiza, Eduard & Jafar, Nejadali & Xu, Lin & Kuang, Yuan, 2022. "Physical model test and parametric optimization of a hydroelectric generating system with a coaxial shaft surge tank," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 880-899.
    6. Zhou, Huanyu & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Liu, Jing, 2022. "Power prediction of wind turbine in the wake using hybrid physical process and machine learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 568-586.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Wenbin & Yu, Xiaoyu & Wei, Jiaxing & Lv, Aifeng, 2024. "Surface flux equilibrium estimates of evaporative fraction and evapotranspiration at global scale: Accuracy evaluation and performance comparison," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    2. Licheng Liu & Wang Zhou & Kaiyu Guan & Bin Peng & Shaoming Xu & Jinyun Tang & Qing Zhu & Jessica Till & Xiaowei Jia & Chongya Jiang & Sheng Wang & Ziqi Qin & Hui Kong & Robert Grant & Symon Mezbahuddi, 2024. "Knowledge-guided machine learning can improve carbon cycle quantification in agroecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Fuentes, Sigfredo & Ortega-Farías, Samuel & Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos & Tongson, Eden & Gonzalez Viejo, Claudia, 2024. "Actual evapotranspiration and energy balance estimation from vineyards using micro-meteorological data and machine learning modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    4. Ali Barzkar & Mohammad Najafzadeh & Farshad Homaei, 2022. "Evaluation of drought events in various climatic conditions using data-driven models and a reliability-based probabilistic model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1931-1952, February.
    5. Fabio Di Nunno & Marco De Matteo & Giovanni Izzo & Francesco Granata, 2023. "A Combined Clustering and Trends Analysis Approach for Characterizing Reference Evapotranspiration in Veneto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Beáta Novotná & Ľuboš Jurík & Ján Čimo & Jozef Palkovič & Branislav Chvíla & Vladimír Kišš, 2022. "Machine Learning for Pan Evaporation Modeling in Different Agroclimatic Zones of the Slovak Republic (Macro-Regions)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Florian Reiner & Martin Brandt & Xiaoye Tong & David Skole & Ankit Kariryaa & Philippe Ciais & Andrew Davies & Pierre Hiernaux & Jérôme Chave & Maurice Mugabowindekwe & Christian Igel & Stefan Oehmcke, 2023. "More than one quarter of Africa’s tree cover is found outside areas previously classified as forest," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Granata, Francesco & Di Nunno, Fabio, 2021. "Forecasting evapotranspiration in different climates using ensembles of recurrent neural networks," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Gianluca Biggi & Martina Iori & Julia Mazzei & Andrea Mina, 2024. "Green Intelligence: The AI content of green technologies," LEM Papers Series 2024/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Luo, Zhaohui & Wang, Longyan & Xu, Jian & Wang, Zilu & Yuan, Jianping & Tan, Andy C.C., 2024. "A reduced order modeling-based machine learning approach for wind turbine wake flow estimation from sparse sensor measurements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    12. Wang, Yangjun & Liu, Kefeng & Zhang, Ren & Qian, Longxia & Shan, Yulong, 2021. "Feasibility of the Northeast Passage: The role of vessel speed, route planning, and icebreaking assistance determined by sea-ice conditions for the container shipping market during 2020–2030," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Richards, Daniel Rex & Lavorel, Sandra, 2022. "Integrating social media data and machine learning to analyse scenarios of landscape appreciation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    14. Gustavo Larrea‐Gallegos & Ian Vázquez‐Rowe, 2022. "Exploring machine learning techniques to predict deforestation to enhance the decision‐making of road construction projects," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 225-239, February.
    15. Galaz, Victor & Centeno, Miguel A. & Callahan, Peter W. & Causevic, Amar & Patterson, Thayer & Brass, Irina & Baum, Seth & Farber, Darryl & Fischer, Joern & Garcia, David & McPhearson, Timon & Jimenez, 2021. "Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Mohammad Taghi Sattari & Halit Apaydin & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) and Tree-Based Models for Estimating ETo by Using Limited Meteorological Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Guoxiong Chen & Qiuming Cheng & Timothy W. Lyons & Jun Shen & Frits Agterberg & Ning Huang & Molei Zhao, 2022. "Reconstructing Earth’s atmospheric oxygenation history using machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Ma, Weichao & Zhao, Zhigao & Yang, Jiebin & Lai, Xu & Liu, Chengpeng & Yang, Jiandong, 2024. "A transient analysis framework for hydropower generating systems under parameter uncertainty by integrating physics-based and data-driven models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    19. Zhang, Xinru & Hou, Lei & Liu, Jiaquan & Yang, Kai & Chai, Chong & Li, Yanhao & He, Sichen, 2022. "Energy consumption prediction for crude oil pipelines based on integrating mechanism analysis and data mining," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    20. Zhou, Huanyu & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Liu, Jing, 2022. "Power prediction of wind turbine in the wake using hybrid physical process and machine learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 568-586.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.