IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v265y2022ics0378377422000877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of direct-seeded guayule cover, crop coefficient, and yield using UAS-based multispectral and RGB data

Author

Listed:
  • Elshikha, Diaa Eldin M.
  • Hunsaker, Douglas J.
  • Waller, Peter M.
  • Thorp, Kelly R.
  • Dierig, David
  • Wang, Guangyao
  • Cruz, Von Mark V.
  • Katterman, Matthew E.
  • Bronson, Kevin F.
  • Wall, Gerard W.
  • Thompson, Alison L.

Abstract

Guayule (Parthenium argentatum, A. Gray), a perennial desert shrub, produces high-quality natural rubber and is targeted as a domestic natural rubber source in the U.S. While commercialization efforts for guayule are on-going, crop management requires plant growth monitoring, irrigation requirement assessment, and final yield estimation. Such assistance for guayule management could be provided with remote sensing (RS) data. In this study, field and RS data, collected via drones, from a 2-year guayule irrigation experiment conducted at Maricopa, Arizona were evaluated. In-season field measurements included fractional canopy cover (fc), basal (Kcb) and single (Kc) crop coefficients, and final yields of dry biomass (DB), rubber (RY), and resin (ReY). The objectives of this paper were to compare vegetations indices from MS data (NDVI) and RGB data (triangular greenness index, TGI); and derive linear prediction models for estimating fc, Kcb, Kc, and yield as functions of the MS and RGB indices. The NDVI and TGI showed similar seasonal trends and were correlated at a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.52 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.11. The prediction of measured fc as a linear function of NDVI (r2 = 0.90) was better than by TGI (r2 = 0.50). In contrast to TGI, the measured fc was highly correlated with estimated fc based on RGB image evaluation (r2 = 0.96). Linear models of Kcb and Kc, developed over the two years of guayule growth, had similar r2 values vs NDVI (r2 = 0.46 and 0.41, respectively) and vs TGI (r2 = 0.48 and 0.40, respectively). Final DB, RY, and ReY were predicted by both NDVI (r2 = 0.75, 0.53, and 0.70, respectively) and TGI (r2 = 0.72, 0.48, and 0.65, respectively). The RS-based models enable estimation of irrigation requirements and yields in guayule production fields in the U.S.

Suggested Citation

  • Elshikha, Diaa Eldin M. & Hunsaker, Douglas J. & Waller, Peter M. & Thorp, Kelly R. & Dierig, David & Wang, Guangyao & Cruz, Von Mark V. & Katterman, Matthew E. & Bronson, Kevin F. & Wall, Gerard W. &, 2022. "Estimation of direct-seeded guayule cover, crop coefficient, and yield using UAS-based multispectral and RGB data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:265:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422000877
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422000877
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pôças, I. & Calera, A. & Campos, I. & Cunha, M., 2020. "Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Mpanga, Isaac K. & Idowu, Omololu John, 2021. "A Decade of Irrigation Water use trends in Southwestern USA: The Role of Irrigation Technology, Best Management Practices, and Outreach Education Programs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Hunsaker, D.J. & Elshikha, D.M., 2017. "Surface irrigation management for guayule rubber production in the US desert Southwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 43-57.
    4. Bausch, Walter C., 1995. "Remote sensing of crop coefficients for improving the irrigation scheduling of corn," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 55-68, April.
    5. Er-Raki, S. & Chehbouni, A. & Guemouria, N. & Duchemin, B. & Ezzahar, J. & Hadria, R., 2007. "Combining FAO-56 model and ground-based remote sensing to estimate water consumptions of wheat crops in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 41-54, January.
    6. José Marín & Salima Yousfi & Pedro V. Mauri & Lorena Parra & Jaime Lloret & Alberto Masaguer, 2020. "RGB Vegetation Indices, NDVI, and Biomass as Indicators to Evaluate C 3 and C 4 Turfgrass under Different Water Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dennis Ccopi & Kevin Ortega & Italo Castañeda & Claudia Rios & Lucia Enriquez & Solanch Patricio & Zoila Ore & David Casanova & Alex Agurto & Noemi Zuñiga & Julio Urquizo, 2024. "Using UAV Images and Phenotypic Traits to Predict Potato Morphology and Yield in Peru," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yu & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Niu, Xiaotao & Shao, Guomin, 2023. "Evaluating maize evapotranspiration using high-resolution UAV-based imagery and FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. French, Andrew N. & Hunsaker, Douglas J. & Sanchez, Charles A. & Saber, Mazin & Gonzalez, Juan Roberto & Anderson, Ray, 2020. "Satellite-based NDVI crop coefficients and evapotranspiration with eddy covariance validation for multiple durum wheat fields in the US Southwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Mahmoud, Shereif H. & Gan, Thian Yew, 2019. "Irrigation water management in arid regions of Middle East: Assessing spatio-temporal variation of actual evapotranspiration through remote sensing techniques and meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 35-47.
    4. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Pôças, I. & Calera, A. & Campos, I. & Cunha, M., 2020. "Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Carpintero, E. & Mateos, L. & Andreu, A. & González-Dugo, M.P., 2020. "Effect of the differences in spectral response of Mediterranean tree canopies on the estimation of evapotranspiration using vegetation index-based crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    7. Garrido-Rubio, Jesús & González-Piqueras, Jose & Campos, Isidro & Osann, Anna & González-Gómez, Laura & Calera, Alfonso, 2020. "Remote sensing–based soil water balance for irrigation water accounting at plot and water user association management scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    8. Sánchez, Nilda & Martínez-Fernández, José & Calera, Alfonso & Torres, Enrique & Pérez-Gutiérrez, Carlos, 2010. "Combining remote sensing and in situ soil moisture data for the application and validation of a distributed water balance model (HIDROMORE)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 69-78, December.
    9. Gonzalez-Dugo, M.P. & Mateos, L., 2008. "Spectral vegetation indices for benchmarking water productivity of irrigated cotton and sugarbeet crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 48-58, January.
    10. Drerup, Philipp & Brueck, Holger & Scherer, Heinrich W., 2017. "Evapotranspiration of winter wheat estimated with the FAO 56 approach and NDVI measurements in a temperate humid climate of NW Europe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 180-188.
    11. Gonçalves, Ivo Zution & Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Campos, Isidro & Neale, Michael R., 2020. "Temporal and spatial variations of irrigation water use for commercial corn fields in Central Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. El-Naggar, A.G. & Hedley, C.B. & Horne, D. & Roudier, P. & Clothier, B.E., 2020. "Soil sensing technology improves application of irrigation water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Wang, Tianxin & Melton, Forrest S. & Pôças, Isabel & Johnson, Lee F. & Thao, Touyee & Post, Kirk & Cassel-Sharma, Florence, 2021. "Evaluation of crop coefficient and evapotranspiration data for sugar beets from landsat surface reflectances using micrometeorological measurements and weighing lysimetry," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    15. Elfarkh, Jamal & Simonneaux, Vincent & Jarlan, Lionel & Ezzahar, Jamal & Boulet, Gilles & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimates in a traditional irrigated area in semi-arid Mediterranean. Comparison of four remote sensing-based models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    16. Muniandy, Josilva M. & Yusop, Zulkifli & Askari, Muhamad, 2016. "Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration models and determination of crop coefficient for Momordica charantia and Capsicum annuum," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 77-89.
    17. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Mota, M. & Wang, T., 2021. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height: Practical application to vegetable, field and fruit crops with focus on parameterization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    18. Pei Wang & Jingjing Ma & Juanjuan Ma & Haitao Sun & Qi Chen, 2021. "A Novel Approach for the Simulation of Reference Evapotranspiration and Its Partitioning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Yousfi, Salima & Marín, José & Parra, Lorena & Lloret, Jaime & Mauri, Pedro V., 2022. "Remote sensing devices as key methods in the advanced turfgrass phenotyping under different water regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    20. Campos, Isidro & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose & González-Dugo, Maria P. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso, 2016. "Combining a water balance model with evapotranspiration measurements to estimate total available soil water in irrigated and rainfed vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 141-152.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:265:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422000877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.