IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v239y2020ics037837742030233x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satellite-based NDVI crop coefficients and evapotranspiration with eddy covariance validation for multiple durum wheat fields in the US Southwest

Author

Listed:
  • French, Andrew N.
  • Hunsaker, Douglas J.
  • Sanchez, Charles A.
  • Saber, Mazin
  • Gonzalez, Juan Roberto
  • Anderson, Ray

Abstract

A three-year study was conducted to assess the ability of satellite-based vegetation index (VI) images to track evapotranspiration over wheat. While the ability of using VIs, notably with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), to track vegetation growth has been well established, the operational capability to accurately estimate the crop coefficient (Kc) and crop evapotranspiration (ETc) at farm-scale from spaceborne platforms has not been widely studied. The study evaluated wheat ET over 7 sites between 2016 and 2019 in Yuma and Maricopa, Arizona, USA estimated by using Sentinel 2 and Venus satellites to map NDVI time-series for entire wheat cropping seasons, December to June. The basal crop coefficient (Kcb) was modeled by the NDVI time-series and the daily FAO56 reference ETo was obtained by near-by weather network stations. Eddy covariance (EC) stations in each field observed ETc during the same seasonal periods, and applied irrigation amounts were logged. The experiment found that remote sensing of NDVI and modeled Kcb accurately estimated Kc and crop ET during mid-season through senescence in most cases. However, NDVI-based estimation performed less well during early season (<60 days after planting), when observed ETc was highly variable due to frequent rain and irrigation at low crop cover. Mid-season Kc values observed for the seven wheat fields were from 0.92 to 1.14, and end of season Kc values ranged from about 0.20 to 0.40, in close agreement to values reported elsewhere. Seasonal VI-based transpiration and ETc values ranged from 467 to 618 mm, closely agreeing with seasonal EC data, which ranged 499–684 mm. Using the Venus sensor, the study in Maricopa in 2019 revealed that when augmented by a background soil water balance model, water stressed wheat can be detected mid-season with NDVI. This capability is specifically due to the sensor’s ability to provide well-calibrated images every 2 days. Findings from this study will help farmers, irrigators, and water managers use and understand the capabilities of visible near infrared remote sensing to track ETc from space.

Suggested Citation

  • French, Andrew N. & Hunsaker, Douglas J. & Sanchez, Charles A. & Saber, Mazin & Gonzalez, Juan Roberto & Anderson, Ray, 2020. "Satellite-based NDVI crop coefficients and evapotranspiration with eddy covariance validation for multiple durum wheat fields in the US Southwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:239:y:2020:i:c:s037837742030233x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742030233X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pôças, I. & Calera, A. & Campos, I. & Cunha, M., 2020. "Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Er-Raki, S. & Chehbouni, A. & Boulet, G. & Williams, D.G., 2010. "Using the dual approach of FAO-56 for partitioning ET into soil and plant components for olive orchards in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1769-1778, November.
    3. Duchemin, B. & Hadria, R. & Erraki, S. & Boulet, G. & Maisongrande, P. & Chehbouni, A. & Escadafal, R. & Ezzahar, J. & Hoedjes, J.C.B. & Kharrou, M.H. & Khabba, S. & Mougenot, B. & Olioso, A. & Rodrig, 2006. "Monitoring wheat phenology and irrigation in Central Morocco: On the use of relationships between evapotranspiration, crops coefficients, leaf area index and remotely-sensed vegetation indices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Gonzalez-Dugo, M.P. & Mateos, L., 2008. "Spectral vegetation indices for benchmarking water productivity of irrigated cotton and sugarbeet crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 48-58, January.
    5. Bausch, Walter C., 1995. "Remote sensing of crop coefficients for improving the irrigation scheduling of corn," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 55-68, April.
    6. Er-Raki, S. & Chehbouni, A. & Guemouria, N. & Duchemin, B. & Ezzahar, J. & Hadria, R., 2007. "Combining FAO-56 model and ground-based remote sensing to estimate water consumptions of wheat crops in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 41-54, January.
    7. Taylor, Richard D. & Koo, Won W., 2015. "2015 Outlook of the U.S. and World Wheat Industries, 2015-2024," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 201310, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    8. Jayanthi, Harikishan & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Wright, James L., 2007. "Development and validation of canopy reflectance-based crop coefficient for potato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-3), pages 235-246, March.
    9. Campos, Isidro & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose, 2010. "Assessing satellite-based basal crop coefficients for irrigated grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 45-54, December.
    10. Rozenstein, Offer & Haymann, Nitai & Kaplan, Gregoriy & Tanny, Josef, 2018. "Estimating cotton water consumption using a time series of Sentinel-2 imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 44-52.
    11. Drerup, Philipp & Brueck, Holger & Scherer, Heinrich W., 2017. "Evapotranspiration of winter wheat estimated with the FAO 56 approach and NDVI measurements in a temperate humid climate of NW Europe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 180-188.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang, Jian & Hao, Xinmei & Zhou, Huiping & Ding, Risheng, 2021. "An integrated strategy for improving water use efficiency by understanding physiological mechanisms of crops responding to water deficit: Present and prospect," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. De Caro, Dario & Ippolito, Matteo & Cannarozzo, Marcella & Provenzano, Giuseppe & Ciraolo, Giuseppe, 2023. "Assessing the performance of the Gaussian Process Regression algorithm to fill gaps in the time-series of daily actual evapotranspiration of different crops in temperate and continental zones using gr," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Amazirh, Abdelhakim & Er-Raki, Salah & Ojha, Nitu & Bouras, El houssaine & Rivalland, Vincent & Merlin, Olivier & Chehbouni, Abdelghani, 2022. "Assimilation of SMAP disaggregated soil moisture and Landsat land surface temperature to improve FAO-56 estimates of ET in semi-arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Zitouna-Chebbi, Rim & Jacob, Frédéric & Prévot, Laurent & Voltz, Marc, 2023. "Documenting evapotranspiration and surface energy fluxes over rainfed annual crops within a Mediterranean hilly agrosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Paredes, Paula & Trigo, Isabel & de Bruin, Henk & Simões, Nuno & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Daily grass reference evapotranspiration with Meteosat Second Generation shortwave radiation and reference ET products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Taketo Eguchi & Masahiro Tasumi, 2023. "Paddy Rice Double-Cropping Field Monitoring via Vegetation Indices with Limited Ground Data—A Case Study for Thapanzeik Dam Irrigation District in Myanmar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Mhawej, Mario & Nasrallah, Ali & Abunnasr, Yaser & Fadel, Ali & Faour, Ghaleb, 2021. "Better irrigation management using the satellite-based adjusted single crop coefficient (aKc) for over sixty crop types in California, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    9. Knipper, Kyle & Yang, Yun & Anderson, Martha & Bambach, Nicolas & Kustas, William & McElrone, Andrew & Gao, Feng & Alsina, Maria Mar, 2023. "Decreased latency in landsat-derived land surface temperature products: A case for near-real-time evapotranspiration estimation in California," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Linghua Liu & Liang Zheng & Ying Wang & Chongchong Liu & Bowen Zhang & Yuzhe Bi, 2023. "Land Use and Ecosystem Services Evolution in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China: Implications for Sustainable Management of National Projects," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pôças, I. & Calera, A. & Campos, I. & Cunha, M., 2020. "Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Mahmoud, Shereif H. & Gan, Thian Yew, 2019. "Irrigation water management in arid regions of Middle East: Assessing spatio-temporal variation of actual evapotranspiration through remote sensing techniques and meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 35-47.
    3. Carpintero, E. & Mateos, L. & Andreu, A. & González-Dugo, M.P., 2020. "Effect of the differences in spectral response of Mediterranean tree canopies on the estimation of evapotranspiration using vegetation index-based crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    4. Garrido-Rubio, Jesús & González-Piqueras, Jose & Campos, Isidro & Osann, Anna & González-Gómez, Laura & Calera, Alfonso, 2020. "Remote sensing–based soil water balance for irrigation water accounting at plot and water user association management scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    5. Sánchez, Nilda & Martínez-Fernández, José & Calera, Alfonso & Torres, Enrique & Pérez-Gutiérrez, Carlos, 2010. "Combining remote sensing and in situ soil moisture data for the application and validation of a distributed water balance model (HIDROMORE)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 69-78, December.
    6. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    7. Campos, Isidro & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Suyker, Andrew E. & Arkebauer, Timothy J. & Gonçalves, Ivo Z., 2017. "Reflectance-based crop coefficients REDUX: For operational evapotranspiration estimates in the age of high producing hybrid varieties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 140-153.
    8. Hunink, Johannes E. & Contreras, Sergio & Soto-García, Mariano & Martin-Gorriz, Bernardo & Martinez-Álvarez, Victoriano & Baille, Alain, 2015. "Estimating groundwater use patterns of perennial and seasonal crops in a Mediterranean irrigation scheme, using remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 47-56.
    9. Campos, Isidro & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose & González-Dugo, Maria P. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso, 2016. "Combining a water balance model with evapotranspiration measurements to estimate total available soil water in irrigated and rainfed vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 141-152.
    10. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Campos, Isidro & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose, 2010. "Assessing satellite-based basal crop coefficients for irrigated grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 45-54, December.
    12. Consoli, S. & Vanella, D., 2014. "Mapping crop evapotranspiration by integrating vegetation indices into a soil water balance model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 71-81.
    13. Zhang, Yu & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Niu, Xiaotao & Shao, Guomin, 2023. "Evaluating maize evapotranspiration using high-resolution UAV-based imagery and FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. Jin, Xiuliang & Yang, Guijun & Xue, Xuzhang & Xu, Xingang & Li, Zhenhai & Feng, Haikuan, 2017. "Validation of two Huanjing-1A/B satellite-based FAO-56 models for estimating winter wheat crop evapotranspiration during mid-season," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 27-38.
    15. González-Dugo, M.P. & Escuin, S. & Cano, F. & Cifuentes, V. & Padilla, F.L.M. & Tirado, J.L. & Oyonarte, N. & Fernández, P. & Mateos, L., 2013. "Monitoring evapotranspiration of irrigated crops using crop coefficients derived from time series of satellite images. II. Application on basin scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 92-104.
    16. Gonçalves, Ivo Zution & Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Campos, Isidro & Neale, Michael R., 2020. "Temporal and spatial variations of irrigation water use for commercial corn fields in Central Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    17. El-Naggar, A.G. & Hedley, C.B. & Horne, D. & Roudier, P. & Clothier, B.E., 2020. "Soil sensing technology improves application of irrigation water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Bispo, R.C. & Hernandez, F.B.T. & Gonçalves, I.Z. & Neale, C.M.U. & Teixeira, A.H.C., 2022. "Remote sensing based evapotranspiration modeling for sugarcane in Brazil using a hybrid approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    19. Wang, Tianxin & Melton, Forrest S. & Pôças, Isabel & Johnson, Lee F. & Thao, Touyee & Post, Kirk & Cassel-Sharma, Florence, 2021. "Evaluation of crop coefficient and evapotranspiration data for sugar beets from landsat surface reflectances using micrometeorological measurements and weighing lysimetry," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    20. Elfarkh, Jamal & Simonneaux, Vincent & Jarlan, Lionel & Ezzahar, Jamal & Boulet, Gilles & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimates in a traditional irrigated area in semi-arid Mediterranean. Comparison of four remote sensing-based models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:239:y:2020:i:c:s037837742030233x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.