IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v245y2021ics0378377420321284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of two canopy resistance models to estimate evapotranspiration for tea and wheat in southeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Haofang
  • Yu, Jianjun
  • Zhang, Chuan
  • Wang, Guoqing
  • Huang, Song
  • Ma, Jiamin

Abstract

Actual evapotranspiration (λET) can be estimated with meteorological parameters using the Penman-Monteith (PM) model where the canopy resistance (rc) plays an important role but is difficult to determine. The Katerji-Perrier (KP) and Todorovic (TD) models are widely used to determine the rc. A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the performances of two models, on hourly and daily scales, in simulating the λET for a tea and a wheat field in southeast China. The estimated λET was compared with the measured λET by the Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) method. The results indicated that the KP model simulated the λET of tea and wheat well for both hourly and daily scales, while the TD model simulated the λET well for the wheat for both time scales but significantly overestimated the tea λET by 44.9%. Therefore, the KP model was preferred to estimate λET for both crops, the TD model should be avoided in tea fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Haofang & Yu, Jianjun & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Ma, Jiamin, 2021. "Comparison of two canopy resistance models to estimate evapotranspiration for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:245:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321284
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420321284
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauwels, Valentijn R.N. & Samson, Roeland, 2006. "Comparison of different methods to measure and model actual evapotranspiration rates for a wet sloping grassland," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(1-2), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Ortega-Farias, Samuel Orlando & Olioso, A. & Fuentes, S. & Valdes, H., 2006. "Latent heat flux over a furrow-irrigated tomato crop using Penman-Monteith equation with a variable surface canopy resistance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 421-432, April.
    3. Lecina, S. & Martinez-Cob, A. & Perez, P. J. & Villalobos, F. J. & Baselga, J. J., 2003. "Fixed versus variable bulk canopy resistance for reference evapotranspiration estimation using the Penman-Monteith equation under semiarid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 181-198, May.
    4. Gharsallah, O. & Facchi, A. & Gandolfi, C., 2013. "Comparison of six evapotranspiration models for a surface irrigated maize agro-ecosystem in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 119-130.
    5. Yan, Haofang & Acquah, Samuel Joe & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Zhang, Hengnian & Zhao, Baoshan & Wu, Haimei, 2019. "Energy partitioning of greenhouse cucumber based on the application of Penman-Monteith and Bulk Transfer models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 201-211.
    6. Pozníková, Gabriela & Fischer, Milan & van Kesteren, Bram & Orság, Matěj & Hlavinka, Petr & Žalud, Zdeněk & Trnka, Miroslav, 2018. "Quantifying turbulent energy fluxes and evapotranspiration in agricultural field conditions: A comparison of micrometeorological methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 249-263.
    7. Alves, Isabel & Santos Pereira, Luis, 2000. "Modelling surface resistance from climatic variables?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 371-385, January.
    8. Srivastava, R.K. & Panda, R.K. & Chakraborty, A. & Halder, D., 2018. "Comparison of actual evapotranspiration of irrigated maize in a sub-humid region using four different canopy resistance based approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 156-165.
    9. Athanasios Margonis & Georgia Papaioannou & Petros Kerkides & Gianna Kitsara & George Bourazanis, 2018. "Canopy Resistance and Actual Evapotranspiration over an Olive Orchard," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 5007-5026, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan, Haofang & Deng, Shuaishuai & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Zhao, Shuang & Li, Mi & Liang, Shaowei & Jiang, Jianhui & Zhou, Yudong, 2023. "Determination of energy partition of a cucumber grown Venlo-type greenhouse in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rana, G. & Katerji, N. & Lazzara, P. & Ferrara, R.M., 2012. "Operational determination of daily actual evapotranspiration of irrigated tomato crops under Mediterranean conditions by one-step and two-step models: Multiannual and local evaluations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Srivastava, R.K. & Panda, R.K. & Chakraborty, A. & Halder, D., 2018. "Comparison of actual evapotranspiration of irrigated maize in a sub-humid region using four different canopy resistance based approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 156-165.
    3. Yan, Haofang & Li, Mi & Zhang, Chuan & Zhang, Jianyun & Wang, Guoqing & Yu, Jianjun & Ma, Jiamin & Zhao, Shuang, 2022. "Comparison of evapotranspiration upscaling methods from instantaneous to daytime scale for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Haofang Yan & Song Huang & Jianyun Zhang & Chuan Zhang & Guoqing Wang & Lanlan Li & Shuang Zhao & Mi Li & Baoshan Zhao, 2022. "Comparison of Shuttleworth–Wallace and Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evapotranspiration of a Tea Field in Southeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Athanasios Margonis & Georgia Papaioannou & Petros Kerkides & Gianna Kitsara & George Bourazanis, 2018. "Canopy Resistance and Actual Evapotranspiration over an Olive Orchard," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 5007-5026, December.
    6. Xu, Junzeng & Liu, Xiaoyin & Yang, Shihong & Qi, Zhiming & Wang, Yijiang, 2017. "Modeling rice evapotranspiration under water-saving irrigation by calibrating canopy resistance model parameters in the Penman-Monteith equation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 55-66.
    7. Mercedeh Taheri & Abdolmajid Mohammadian & Fatemeh Ganji & Mostafa Bigdeli & Mohsen Nasseri, 2022. "Energy-Based Approaches in Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration Focusing on Land Surface Temperature: A Review of Methods, Concepts, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-57, February.
    8. Allen, Richard G. & Pruitt, William O. & Wright, James L. & Howell, Terry A. & Ventura, Francesca & Snyder, Richard & Itenfisu, Daniel & Steduto, Pasquale & Berengena, Joaquin & Yrisarry, Javier Basel, 2006. "A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Zhang, Baozhong & Wang, Shunsheng & Ge, Jiankun & Gao, Shikai & Yang, Zaiqiang, 2021. "Energy budget for tomato plants grown in a greenhouse in northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Jovanovic, N., 2020. "Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Escarabajal-Henarejos, D. & Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Martínez-Molina, L. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Selection of device to determine temperature gradients for estimating evapotranspiration using energy balance method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 136-147.
    12. Ding, Risheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Yanqun & Hao, Xinmei & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien, 2015. "A dynamic surface conductance to predict crop water use from partial to full canopy cover," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Pengrui Ai & Yingjie Ma, 2020. "Estimation of Evapotranspiration of a Jujube/Cotton Intercropping System in an Arid Area Based on the Dual Crop Coefficient Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Widmoser, Peter, 2009. "A discussion on and alternative to the Penman-Monteith equation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 711-721, April.
    15. Uk-Hyeon Yeo & Sang-Yeon Lee & Se-Jun Park & Jun-Gyu Kim & Young-Bae Choi & Rack-Woo Kim & Jong Hwa Shin & In-Bok Lee, 2022. "Rooftop Greenhouse: (1) Design and Validation of a BES Model for a Plastic-Covered Greenhouse Considering the Tomato Crop Model and Natural Ventilation Characteristics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, June.
    16. Li, Bo & Shi, Bijiao & Yao, Zhenzhu & Kumar Shukla, Manoj & Du, Taisheng, 2020. "Energy partitioning and microclimate of solar greenhouse under drip and furrow irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    17. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    18. Rong, Yao & Dai, Xiaoqin & Wang, Weishu & Wu, Peijin & Huo, Zailin, 2023. "Dependence of evapotranspiration validity on shallow groundwater in arid area-a three years field observation experiment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    19. Liu, Hao & Li, Huanhuan & Ning, Huifeng & Zhang, Xiaoxian & Li, Shuang & Pang, Jie & Wang, Guangshuai & Sun, Jingsheng, 2019. "Optimizing irrigation frequency and amount to balance yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of greenhouse tomato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    20. Kheir, Ahmed M.S. & Alrajhi, Abdullah A. & Ghoneim, Adel M. & Ali, Esmat F. & Magrashi, Ali & Zoghdan, Medhat G. & Abdelkhalik, Sedhom A.M. & Fahmy, Ahmed E. & Elnashar, Abdelrazek, 2021. "Modeling deficit irrigation-based evapotranspiration optimizes wheat yield and water productivity in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:245:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.