IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v276y2023ics0378377422005947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of energy partition of a cucumber grown Venlo-type greenhouse in southeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Haofang
  • Deng, Shuaishuai
  • Zhang, Chuan
  • Wang, Guoqing
  • Zhao, Shuang
  • Li, Mi
  • Liang, Shaowei
  • Jiang, Jianhui
  • Zhou, Yudong

Abstract

Accurate determination of energy partition inside greenhouses is a key procedure in optimizing efficient water management. In this study, micro-meteorological data and energy fluxes of cucumber were measured during four planting seasons (2018–2021) in a Venlo-type greenhouse to analyze the energy manifestation in different growing stages. The results showed that the latent heat flux (λET) was the primary component of net radiation (Rn), accounting for 61.2–72.6 % of Rn during the whole growing seasons, followed by sensible heat flux (H, 19.8–24.3 % of Rn) and soil heat flux (G, 7.6–14.8 % of Rn). The λET increased while both H and G decreased as the crop grew. Especially, H was larger than λET at midday in the initial growing stage. Energy partition was intensely affected by the leaf area index (LAI). The λET/Rn increased linearly with the increase in LAI, while the H/Rn decreased linearly and G/Rn decreased exponentially until LAI reached 4 m2 m−2. Canopy conductance (Gc), Priestley-Taylor coefficient (α), and the decoupling coefficient (Ω) were calculated to evaluate the controlling factors over cucumber λET. The high values of the α (= 1.15 ± 0.05) and the Ω (= 0.65 ± 0.05) indicated that the cucumber λET was principally constrained by Rn. The Gc was calculated by inverting Penman-Monteith (PM) equation using aerodynamic conductance (Ga) values obtained by the heat transfer coefficient (hs) method based on accurate convection regimes. The Gc varied from 1.42 to 17.98 mm s−1 and high Gc values corresponded to high λET. The λET was estimated by the Ω model with the mean root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) equaled 32.65 and 25.73 W m−2, while the determination coefficient (R2) was 0.94. The H was reproduced by the Bulk Transfer (BT) model to validate Ga with the RMSE and MAE equaled 32.57 and 24.95 W m−2, the R2 was 0.86. The results also indicated that the simplified energy balance (EB) method was an optional approach to analyzing energy partition in greenhouses. Consequently, more energy could be saved by avoiding the excessive application of water and thus improving crop water use efficiency in greenhouses.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Haofang & Deng, Shuaishuai & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Zhao, Shuang & Li, Mi & Liang, Shaowei & Jiang, Jianhui & Zhou, Yudong, 2023. "Determination of energy partition of a cucumber grown Venlo-type greenhouse in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422005947
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422005947
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan, Haofang & Li, Mi & Zhang, Chuan & Zhang, Jianyun & Wang, Guoqing & Yu, Jianjun & Ma, Jiamin & Zhao, Shuang, 2022. "Comparison of evapotranspiration upscaling methods from instantaneous to daytime scale for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Jiao, Linjie & Ding, Risheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien, 2018. "A comparison of energy partitioning and evapotranspiration over closed maize and sparse grapevine canopies in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 251-260.
    3. Li, Bo & Shi, Bijiao & Yao, Zhenzhu & Kumar Shukla, Manoj & Du, Taisheng, 2020. "Energy partitioning and microclimate of solar greenhouse under drip and furrow irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Harmanto & Salokhe, V.M. & Babel, M.S. & Tantau, H.J., 2005. "Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 225-242, February.
    5. Yan, Haofang & Yu, Jianjun & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Ma, Jiamin, 2021. "Comparison of two canopy resistance models to estimate evapotranspiration for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Saadon, Tal & Lazarovitch, Naftali & Jerszurki, Daniela & Tas, Eran, 2021. "Predicting net radiation in naturally ventilated greenhouses based on outside global solar radiation for reference evapotranspiration estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    7. Tian, Fuqiang & Yang, Pengju & Hu, Hongchang & Liu, Hui, 2017. "Energy balance and canopy conductance for a cotton field under film mulched drip irrigation in an arid region of northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 110-121.
    8. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Zhang, Baozhong & Wang, Shunsheng & Ge, Jiankun & Gao, Shikai & Yang, Zaiqiang, 2021. "Energy budget for tomato plants grown in a greenhouse in northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    9. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 899-920, April.
    10. Ertek, Ahmet & Sensoy, Suat & Gedik, Ibrahim & Kucukyumuk, Cenk, 2006. "Irrigation scheduling based on pan evaporation values for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 159-172, March.
    11. Yang, Seung-Hwan & Rhee, Joong Yong, 2013. "Utilization and performance evaluation of a surplus air heat pump system for greenhouse cooling and heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 244-251.
    12. Huang, Song & Yan, Haofang & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Acquah, Samuel Joe & Yu, Jianjun & Li, Lanlan & Ma, Jiamin & Opoku Darko, Ransford, 2020. "Modeling evapotranspiration for cucumber plants based on the Shuttleworth-Wallace model in a Venlo-type greenhouse," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Gavilán, Pedro & Ruiz, Natividad & Lozano, David, 2015. "Daily forecasting of reference and strawberry crop evapotranspiration in greenhouses in a Mediterranean climate based on solar radiation estimates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 307-317.
    15. Yan, Haofang & Acquah, Samuel Joe & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Zhang, Hengnian & Zhao, Baoshan & Wu, Haimei, 2019. "Energy partitioning of greenhouse cucumber based on the application of Penman-Monteith and Bulk Transfer models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 201-211.
    16. Haofang Yan & Song Huang & Jianyun Zhang & Chuan Zhang & Guoqing Wang & Lanlan Li & Shuang Zhao & Mi Li & Baoshan Zhao, 2022. "Comparison of Shuttleworth–Wallace and Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evapotranspiration of a Tea Field in Southeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Weishu & Rong, Yao & Dai, Xiaoqin & Zhang, Chenglong & Wang, Chaozi & Huo, Zailin, 2024. "Variation and attribution of energy distribution for salinized sunflower farmland in arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Zhang, Baozhong & Wang, Shunsheng & Ge, Jiankun & Gao, Shikai & Yang, Zaiqiang, 2021. "Energy budget for tomato plants grown in a greenhouse in northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Gong, Xuewen & Qiu, Rangjian & Ge, Jiankun & Bo, Guokui & Ping, Yinglu & Xin, Qingsong & Wang, Shunsheng, 2021. "Evapotranspiration partitioning of greenhouse grown tomato using a modified Priestley–Taylor model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Mingze Yao & Manman Gao & Jingkuan Wang & Bo Li & Lizhen Mao & Mingyu Zhao & Zhanyang Xu & Hongfei Niu & Tieliang Wang & Lei Sun & Dongshuang Niu, 2023. "Estimating Evapotranspiration of Greenhouse Tomato under Different Irrigation Levels Using a Modified Dual Crop Coefficient Model in Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Qin, Shujing & Fan, Yangzhen & Li, Sien & Cheng, Lei & Zhang, Lu & Xi, Haiyang & Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Pan, 2023. "Partitioning of available energy in canopy and soil surface in croplands with different irrigation methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Zhang, Tao & Qiu, Rangjian & Ding, Risheng & Wu, Jingwei & Clothier, Brent, 2023. "Multi-scale spectral characteristics of latent heat flux over flooded rice and winter wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    6. Feng, Yu & Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Tang, Dahua & Cui, Ningbo, 2017. "Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-206.
    7. Fuentes, Sigfredo & Ortega-Farías, Samuel & Carrasco-Benavides, Marcos & Tongson, Eden & Gonzalez Viejo, Claudia, 2024. "Actual evapotranspiration and energy balance estimation from vineyards using micro-meteorological data and machine learning modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    8. Yan, Haofang & Li, Mi & Zhang, Chuan & Zhang, Jianyun & Wang, Guoqing & Yu, Jianjun & Ma, Jiamin & Zhao, Shuang, 2022. "Comparison of evapotranspiration upscaling methods from instantaneous to daytime scale for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    9. Yi, Ping & Liu, Hao & Liu, Shengxing & Han, Yang & Zhang, Xianbo & Yang, Guang & Wang, Chunting & Kader, Abdoul & Qiang, Xiaoman & Wang, Jinglei, 2024. "Assessment for aerodynamic and canopy resistances in simulating latent heat flux of Venlo-type greenhouse tomato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    10. Patricia Malva Costa & Isabel Pôças & Mário Cunha, 2019. "Modelling evapotranspiration of soilless cut roses 'Red Naomi' based on climatic and crop predictors," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 46(2), pages 107-114.
    11. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    12. Feng, Yu & Hao, Weiping & Gao, Lili & Li, Haoru & Gong, Daozhi & Cui, Ningbo, 2019. "Comparison of maize water consumption at different scales between mulched and non-mulched croplands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 315-324.
    13. Gong, Xuewen & Li, Xiaoming & Qiu, Rangjian & Bo, Guokui & Ping, Yinglu & Xin, Qingsong & Ge, Jiankun, 2022. "Ventilation and irrigation management strategy for tomato cultivated in greenhouses," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Li, Bo & Shi, Bijiao & Yao, Zhenzhu & Kumar Shukla, Manoj & Du, Taisheng, 2020. "Energy partitioning and microclimate of solar greenhouse under drip and furrow irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    15. Saadon, Tal & Lazarovitch, Naftali & Jerszurki, Daniela & Tas, Eran, 2021. "Predicting net radiation in naturally ventilated greenhouses based on outside global solar radiation for reference evapotranspiration estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    16. Liu, Hao & Li, Huanhuan & Ning, Huifeng & Zhang, Xiaoxian & Li, Shuang & Pang, Jie & Wang, Guangshuai & Sun, Jingsheng, 2019. "Optimizing irrigation frequency and amount to balance yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of greenhouse tomato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Qu, Feng & Zhang, Qi & Jiang, Zhaoxi & Zhang, Caihong & Zhang, Zhi & Hu, Xiaohui, 2022. "Optimizing irrigation and fertilization frequency for greenhouse cucumber grown at different air temperatures using a comprehensive evaluation model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    18. Liao, Qi & Ding, Risheng & Du, Taisheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien, 2022. "Stomatal conductance drives variations of yield and water use of maize under water and nitrogen stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    19. Yang, Hui & Du, Taisheng & Qiu, Rangjian & Chen, Jinliang & Wang, Feng & Li, Yang & Wang, Chenxia & Gao, Lihong & Kang, Shaozhong, 2017. "Improved water use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse crops under regulated deficit irrigation in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 193-204.
    20. Zhao, Yin & Mao, Xiaomin & Shukla, Manoj K. & Tian, Fei & Hou, Mengjie & Zhang, Tong & Li, Sien, 2021. "How does film mulching modify available energy, evapotranspiration, and crop coefficient during the seed–maize growing season in northwest China?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422005947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.