IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v186y2017icp66-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and production components of safflower genotypes affected by irrigation at phenological stages

Author

Listed:
  • Santos, Reginaldo Ferreira
  • Bassegio, Doglas
  • de Almeida Silva, Marcelo

Abstract

Drought and the scarce resource of water for irrigation can limit agricultural production under tropical conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate the growth and yield response of safflower genotypes to water deficit in the soil profile during vegetative, flowering and yield formation stages, both in clayey and sandy soils. The experiments were carried out in Engenheiro Coelho, SP, Brazil, in autumn-winter 2014. The experimental design was a randomized block in a factorial arrangement, consisting of the genotypes IMA-2232, IMA-4409, IMA-2109 and IAPAR, and irrigation schemes water deficit (WD), irrigation at the vegetative stage (V), irrigation at the grain formation stage (G), irrigation at the vegetative and flowering (VF) stages, irrigation at the vegetative and grain formation (VG) stages, irrigation at the flowering and grain formation (FG) stages and irrigation at the vegetative, flowering and grain formation (VFG) stages (control). The growth of safflower genotypes, yield components and grain and oil yield were weaken by gradual water restriction at the stages, especially at the vegetative stage in both soils. The water regime with irrigation at the flowering stage and grain formation (FG) only did not reduce the oil content in the genotypes in clayey soil. The IAPAR genotype produced more grains (2.7Mgha−1), while the IMA-4409 genotype had higher oil content (42.8%) but they both had similar oil yield (0.75 and 0.79Mgha−1, respectively) on the clayey soil with irrigation throughout the cycle (VFG). Oil yield in the sandy soil treatment was similar to that of clayey soil (0.72Mgha−1) in VFG, in particular for the IMA-4409 genotype. The IAPAR and IMA-4409 genotypes were generally less sensitive to interruption of water supply at the growth stages. In general, the higher total water storage in soil profile of clayey soil, compared to sandy soil, did not benefit the safflower crop. On an average, irrigation only at vegetative and flowering stage (VG) stages can save 15% of water but with a corresponding 50% reduction in yield, both in clayey soil and sandy soil. The irrigation during the VFG stages might be practiced to attain the highest yield of safflower genotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Santos, Reginaldo Ferreira & Bassegio, Doglas & de Almeida Silva, Marcelo, 2017. "Productivity and production components of safflower genotypes affected by irrigation at phenological stages," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 66-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:186:y:2017:i:c:p:66-74
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377417300665
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kar, Gouranga & Kumar, Ashwani & Martha, M., 2007. "Water use efficiency and crop coefficients of dry season oilseed crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 73-82, January.
    2. Singh, Sukhbir & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Grover, Kulbhushan & Begna, Sultan & Auld, Dick, 2016. "Drought response and yield formation of spring safflower under different water regimes in the semiarid Southern High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 354-362.
    3. Singh, Sukhbir & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Grover, Kulbhushan K. & Hilaire, Rolston St. & Begna, Sultan, 2016. "Effect of growth stage based irrigation on soil water extraction and water use efficiency of spring safflower cultivars," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 432-439.
    4. Lovelli, S. & Perniola, M. & Ferrara, A. & Di Tommaso, T., 2007. "Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 73-80, August.
    5. Raziei, Tayeb & Pereira, Luis S., 2013. "Estimation of ETo with Hargreaves–Samani and FAO-PM temperature methods for a wide range of climates in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-18.
    6. Istanbulluoglu, A. & Gocmen, E. & Gezer, E. & Pasa, C. & Konukcu, F., 2009. "Effects of water stress at different development stages on yield and water productivity of winter and summer safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1429-1434, October.
    7. Ngouajio, Mathieu & Wang, Guangyao & Goldy, Ronald, 2007. "Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 285-291, February.
    8. Arora, V.K. & Singh, C.B. & Sidhu, A.S. & Thind, S.S., 2011. "Irrigation, tillage and mulching effects on soybean yield and water productivity in relation to soil texture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 563-568, February.
    9. Istanbulluoglu, Ahmet, 2009. "Effects of irrigation regimes on yield and water productivity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Mediterranean climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1792-1798, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcelo de Almeida Silva & Hariane Luiz Santos & Lusiane de Sousa Ferreira & Dayane Mércia Ribeiro Silva & Jania Claudia Camilo dos Santos & Fernanda Pacheco de Almeida Prado Bortolheiro, 2023. "Physiological Changes and Yield Components of Safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.) Lines as a Function of Water Deficit and Recovery in the Flowering Phase," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Sukhbir & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Grover, Kulbhushan K. & Hilaire, Rolston St. & Begna, Sultan, 2016. "Effect of growth stage based irrigation on soil water extraction and water use efficiency of spring safflower cultivars," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 432-439.
    2. Katuwal, Krishna B. & Cho, Youngkoo & Singh, Sukhbir & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Begna, Sultan & Stamm, Michael, 2020. "Soil water extraction pattern and water use efficiency of spring canola under growth-stage-based irrigation management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Bhattarai, Bishwoyog & Singh, Sukhbir & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Begna, Sultan & Saini, Rupinder & Auld, Dick, 2020. "Spring safflower water use patterns in response to preseason and in-season irrigation applications," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Shahrokhnia, Mohammad Hossein & Sepaskhah, Ali Reza, 2016. "Effects of irrigation strategies, planting methods and nitrogen fertilization on yield, water and nitrogen efficiencies of safflower," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 18-30.
    5. Yousef Joshan & Behzad Sani & Hamid Jabbari & Hamid Mozafari & Payam Moaveni, 2019. "Effect of drought stress on oil content and fatty acids composition of some safflower genotypes," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 563-567.
    6. Istanbulluoglu, Ahmet, 2009. "Effects of irrigation regimes on yield and water productivity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Mediterranean climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1792-1798, December.
    7. Panagiotis Christias & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Mariana Mocanu, 2020. "Comparison of Three Computational Approaches for Tree Crop Irrigation Decision Support," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Mukherjee, A. & Kundu, M. & Sarkar, S., 2010. "Role of irrigation and mulch on yield, evapotranspiration rate and water use pattern of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 182-189, December.
    9. Minhas, P.S. & Ramos, Tiago B. & Ben-Gal, Alon & Pereira, Luis S., 2020. "Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Bhattarai, Bishwoyog & Singh, Sukhbir & West, Charles P. & Ritchie, Glen L. & Trostle, Calvin L., 2020. "Water Depletion Pattern and Water Use Efficiency of Forage Sorghum, Pearl millet, and Corn Under Water Limiting Condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    11. Marinez Sampaio & Reginaldo Santos & Paulo Sérgio Oliveira & Doglas Bassegio & Carlos Augusto Moraes Rego & Lucas Silveira & Bruna Costa & Eloisa Mattei & Juan Herrera, 2018. "Comparison of Safflower Cultivation in Two Seasons in the South of Brazil," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 1-92, April.
    12. Ebrahimian, Elnaz & Seyyedi, Seyyed Mohammad & Bybordi, Ahmad & Damalas, Christos A., 2019. "Seed yield and oil quality of sunflower, safflower, and sesame under different levels of irrigation water availability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 149-157.
    13. Singh, Sukhbir & Boote, Kenneth J. & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Grover, Kulbhushan K., 2017. "Estimating water balance, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of spring safflower using the CROPGRO model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 137-144.
    14. Ghamarnia, Houshang & Gholamian, Mohsen, 2013. "The effect of saline shallow ground and surface water under deficit irrigation on (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in semi arid condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 29-37.
    15. Istanbulluoglu, A. & Gocmen, E. & Gezer, E. & Pasa, C. & Konukcu, F., 2009. "Effects of water stress at different development stages on yield and water productivity of winter and summer safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1429-1434, October.
    16. Ghamarnia, Houshang & Jalili, Zahra, 2014. "Shallow saline groundwater use by Black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) in the presence of surface water in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 89-100.
    17. Marcelo de Almeida Silva & Hariane Luiz Santos & Lusiane de Sousa Ferreira & Dayane Mércia Ribeiro Silva & Jania Claudia Camilo dos Santos & Fernanda Pacheco de Almeida Prado Bortolheiro, 2023. "Physiological Changes and Yield Components of Safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.) Lines as a Function of Water Deficit and Recovery in the Flowering Phase," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Çolak, Yeşim Bozkurt & Yazar, Attila & Gönen, Engin & Eroğlu, E. Çağlar, 2018. "Yield and quality response of surface and subsurface drip-irrigated eggplant and comparison of net returns," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 165-175.
    19. Kaur, Rajbir & Arora, VK, 2019. "Deep tillage and residue mulch effects on productivity and water and nitrogen economy of spring maize in north-west India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 724-731.
    20. Nandi, R. & Mondal, K. & Singh, K.C. & Saha, M. & Bandyopadhyay, P.K. & Ghosh, P.K., 2021. "Yield-water relationships of lentil grown under different rice establishments in Lower Gangetic Plain of India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:186:y:2017:i:c:p:66-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.