IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v146y2014icp201-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usefulness of selected weather indices to evaluation of yellow lupine yielding possibility

Author

Listed:
  • Podleśna, A.
  • Podleśny, J.
  • Doroszewski, A.

Abstract

The aim of the undertaken research was an evaluation of the weather condition effect on growth and development as well as the yielding of yellow lupine plants. Weather conditions were characterized on the basis of the amount and distribution of precipitation, Sielianinov's index (K) and climatic water balance index (CWB). Genotypes of yellow lupine: Polo – an indeterminate and Legat – a determinate genotype were included into the research. An experiment was established by using the split-plot–split-block method at four replications on good rye complex soil. It founded on dependencies among values of Sielianinov's index, climatic water balance index (CWB), dynamic of mass increase and physiological indicator of plant growth (RGR). It was found that an unprofitable effect of the precipitation deficit is dependent on the developmental phase of lupine and a genotype. A shortage in precipitation which occurred after sowing caused a prolongation of emergence; however, it did not significantly decrease the plant's density because seedlings were able to use water accumulated in soil during the winter. Whereas, a long period of water shortage in the soil occurred from the beginning of flowering (BBCH 60) to pod setting (BBCH 75) had great effects on morphological features and yellow lupine yield. Unsuitable weather in this period caused a decrease in the plant's height, reduction of leaf area, inhibition of relative growth rate (RGR) and a reduction of pods and seeds number per plant. Polo (an indeterminate genotype), appeared less sensitive on periodic water deficit in the soil than Legat (a determined genotype). This was also confirmed by the values of R index (a ratio of dry mass of root system to the aboveground part mass), which is generally admitted as an indicator of the plant's resistance to drought stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Podleśna, A. & Podleśny, J. & Doroszewski, A., 2014. "Usefulness of selected weather indices to evaluation of yellow lupine yielding possibility," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 201-207.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:146:y:2014:i:c:p:201-207
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377414002078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richards, Richard A., 2006. "Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 197-211, February.
    2. Ana Iglesias & Luis Garrote & Sonia Quiroga & Marta Moneo, 2009. "Impacts of climate change in agriculture in Europe. PESETA-Agriculture study," JRC Research Reports JRC55386, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grażyna SZYMAŃSKA & Agnieszka FALIGOWSKA & Katarzyna PANASIEWICZ & Jerzy SZUKAŁA & Wiesław KOZIARA, 2017. "The productivity of two yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) cultivars as an effect of different farming systems," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 552-557.
    2. Agnieszka Faligowska, 2023. "Response of New Yellow Lupin Varieties to Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. Lupinus under Central European Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. M. Borowska & J. Prusinski & E. Kaszkowiak, 2015. "Production results of intensification of cultivation technologies in three lupin (Lupinus L.) species," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(9), pages 426-431.
    4. Katarzyna Adamczewska-Sowińska & Józef Sowiński & Anna Jama-Rodzeńska, 2021. "The Effect of Sowing Date and Harvest Time on Leafy Greens of Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Yield and Selected Nutritional Parameters," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Peng & Zhang, Junjie & Chen, Minpeng, 2017. "Economic impacts of climate change on agriculture: The importance of additional climatic variables other than temperature and precipitation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 8-31.
    2. Ma, Shaoxiu & Churkina, Galina & Wieland, Ralf & Gessler, Arthur, 2011. "Optimization and evaluation of the ANTHRO-BGC model for winter crops in Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3662-3679.
    3. Li, Baoru & Zhang, Xiying & Morita, Shigenori & Sekiya, Nobuhito & Araki, Hideki & Gu, Huijie & Han, Jie & Lu, Yang & Liu, Xiuwei, 2022. "Are crop deep roots always beneficial for combating drought: A review of root structure and function, regulation and phenotyping," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    4. Juan-Carlos Ciscar & Antonio Soria & Clare M. Goodess & Ole B. Christensen & Ana Iglesias & Luis Garrote & Marta Moneo & Sonia Quiroga & Luc Feyen & Rutger Dankers & Robert Nicholls & Julie Richards &, 2009. "Climate change impacts in Europe. Final report of the PESETA research project," JRC Research Reports JRC55391, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Wiréhn, Lotten, 2018. "Nordic agriculture under climate change: A systematic review of challenges, opportunities and adaptation strategies for crop production," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 63-74.
    6. Mansour, Elsayed & Abdul-Hamid, Mohamed I & Yasin, Mohamed T & Qabil, Naglaa & Attia, Ahmed, 2017. "Identifying drought-tolerant genotypes of barley and their responses to various irrigation levels in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 58-67.
    7. Shrestha, Shailesh & Ciaian, Pavel & Himics, Mihay & Van Doorslaer, Benjamin, 2013. "Impacts of Climate Change on EU Agriculture," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Dono, Gabriele & Cortignani, Raffaele & Dell'Unto, Davide & Deligios, Paola & Doro, Luca & Lacetera, Nicola & Mula, Laura & Pasqui, Massimiliano & Quaresima, Sara & Vitali, Andrea & Roggero, Pier Paol, 2016. "Winners and losers from climate change in agriculture: Insights from a case study in the Mediterranean basin," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 65-75.
    9. Středa, Tomáš & Dostál, Vítězslav & Horáková, Vladimíra & Chloupek, Oldřich, 2012. "Effective use of water by wheat varieties with different root system sizes in rain-fed experiments in Central Europe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 203-209.
    10. Shrestha, Shailesh & Himics, Mihaly & Van Doorslaer, Benjamin & Ciaian, Pavel, 2012. "EU wide regional impacts of climate change," 123rd Seminar, February 23-24, 2012, Dublin, Ireland 122546, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. -, 2011. "An assessment of the economic impact of climate change on the agriculture sector in Saint Lucia," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 38566, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. S. Changhai & D. Baodi & Q. Yunzhou & L. Yuxin & S. Lei & L. Mengyu & L. Haipei, 2010. "Physiological regulation of high transpiration efficiency in winter wheat under drought conditions," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(7), pages 340-347.
    13. Bouman, B. A.M., 2007. "A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spatial scales," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 93(1-3), pages 43-60, March.
    14. Dong, Baodi & Shi, Lei & Shi, Changhai & Qiao, Yunzhou & Liu, Mengyu & Zhang, Zhengbin, 2011. "Grain yield and water use efficiency of two types of winter wheat cultivars under different water regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 103-110.
    15. Štolbová Marie, 2011. "An evaluation of the relevance of EU less favoured areas policy for dry regions of the Czech Republic," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 3(4), pages 282-298, January.
    16. Chamekh Zoubeir & Ines Zouari & Salma Jallouli & Sawsen Ayadi & Sebei Abdenour & Youssef Trifa, 2022. "Breeding for salt tolerance in wheat: The contribution of carbon isotopic signatures," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 43-54.
    17. Tomáš Středa & Jana Hajzlerová & Jhonny Alba-Mejía & Ivana Jovanović & Nicole Frantová & Hana Středová, 2024. "Quo vadis, breeding for an efficient root system, in the era of climate change?," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(4), pages 181-211.
    18. -, 2011. "An assessment of the economic impact of climate change on the agriculture sector in Trinidad And Tobago," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 38587, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. K, Sudarkodi & K, Sathyabama, 2011. "The Impact Of Climate Change On Agriculture," MPRA Paper 29784, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Brainard, D.C. & Byl, B. & Hayden, Z.D. & Noyes, D.C. & Bakker, J. & Werling, B., 2019. "Managing drought risk in a changing climate: Irrigation and cultivar impacts on Michigan asparagus," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 773-781.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:146:y:2014:i:c:p:201-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.