IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i5p405-d547248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Sowing Date and Harvest Time on Leafy Greens of Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Yield and Selected Nutritional Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Adamczewska-Sowińska

    (Department of Horticulture, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Józef Sowiński

    (Institute of Agroecology and Crop Production, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Anna Jama-Rodzeńska

    (Institute of Agroecology and Crop Production, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

In 2015–2017, field experiments were conducted, in two facilities of the Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences: at the Research and Didactic Station in Psary (51°19′08” N, 17°03′37” E) and in the plots of the Department of Crop Production in Pawlowice (51°17′32” N, 17°11′72” E). The research aimed to evaluate fresh biomass yield and selected quality parameters of quinoa grown as a green leafy vegetable. The study was conducted on two soils: medium (clay soil texture) and light (sand soil texture), sowing quinoa in spring and summer periods. On both soils, quinoa was harvested 5 times at each sowing date. The yields of fresh plant biomass, basic morphological characteristics and certain quality traits were compared. All experimental factors had a significant effect on quinoa fresh biomass yield. On light soil, quinoa yielded 4 times lower than on medium soil, and its cultivation posed a high risk, especially at the summer sowing date. The experimental factors used had the greatest effect on macronutrient content. Growing quinoa on medium soil yielded biomass with higher K, Mg, Ca and N-NO 3 concentration, while spring sown plants had higher K and N-NO 3 concentration. Harvesting date had the greatest effect on the change in nutritional values. Potassium content decreased as the harvest date was delayed, and N-NO 3 content decreased gradually until the fourth harvest date. The results showed that quinoa should be harvested as a green leafy vegetable when it reaches a height of 20–30 cm; biomass production is then at 500–1000 g per m 2 , potassium content is less than 10 g per 100 g dry matter and N-NO 3 content is less than 100 mg 100 −1 f.m.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Adamczewska-Sowińska & Józef Sowiński & Anna Jama-Rodzeńska, 2021. "The Effect of Sowing Date and Harvest Time on Leafy Greens of Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Yield and Selected Nutritional Parameters," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:405-:d:547248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/5/405/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/5/405/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Faligowska & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Grażyna Szymańska & Karolina Ratajczak & Hanna Sulewska & Agnieszka Pszczółkowska & Anna Kocira, 2020. "Influence of Farming System on Weed Infestation and on Productivity of Narrow-Leaved Lupin ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Podleśna, A. & Podleśny, J. & Doroszewski, A., 2014. "Usefulness of selected weather indices to evaluation of yellow lupine yielding possibility," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 201-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Faligowska, 2023. "Response of New Yellow Lupin Varieties to Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. Lupinus under Central European Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak, 2021. "Weed Ecology and New Approaches for Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-6, March.
    3. M. Borowska & J. Prusinski & E. Kaszkowiak, 2015. "Production results of intensification of cultivation technologies in three lupin (Lupinus L.) species," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(9), pages 426-431.
    4. Grażyna SZYMAŃSKA & Agnieszka FALIGOWSKA & Katarzyna PANASIEWICZ & Jerzy SZUKAŁA & Wiesław KOZIARA, 2017. "The productivity of two yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) cultivars as an effect of different farming systems," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 552-557.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:405-:d:547248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.