IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v104y2012icp203-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective use of water by wheat varieties with different root system sizes in rain-fed experiments in Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Středa, Tomáš
  • Dostál, Vítězslav
  • Horáková, Vladimíra
  • Chloupek, Oldřich

Abstract

Effective use of water (EUW) was evaluated along with grain yield in the same environment over different years and locations. The root system sizes of sets of winter wheat varieties (20, 20, 20 and 18 varieties in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively) were evaluated by measuring their electric capacity. The RSS results were compared with the yield and grain quality in official variety trials at 20, 22, 23 and 23 stations in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. All varieties were tested under two conditions with low and high inputs, and in some years they were also tested after late sowing and after unsuitable forecrops at a few stations. The RSS was mostly controlled by the location; the varieties differed significantly, explaining 2.6–15.6% of the variation in RSS, while 1.7–3.9% of the total variation was unexplained. In 2007, a dry year, the RSS was significantly correlated with yield in both variants (r2=0.285* and 0.284*, respectively) and with yield of starch (r2=0.248*) at all stations. In 2008, the highest-yielding year, the correlation of RSS with yield at the three stations at the lowest altitude and with the highest temperature was negative (r=−0.459*). In 2009, the yield was highly significantly correlated at only five locations in medium altitudes, where drought occurred, only in the high input treatment (r2=0.391**). No relationship between RSS and yield was found in the wet year 2010. The third of the varieties with the greatest RSS had an RSS that was 21% greater than those of the one-third of varieties with the smallest RSS in 2007 and a grain yield 420kgha−1 higher. The difference responded to additional use of about 7mm of subsoil water. The most contrasting varieties showed a yield difference of 860kg, i.e., approximately 15mm of subsoil water. We conclude that differences in the EUW expressed as different yields under the same conditions can be partly attributed to different RSSs (probably due to deeper rooting) and can be improved by breeding.

Suggested Citation

  • Středa, Tomáš & Dostál, Vítězslav & Horáková, Vladimíra & Chloupek, Oldřich, 2012. "Effective use of water by wheat varieties with different root system sizes in rain-fed experiments in Central Europe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 203-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:104:y:2012:i:c:p:203-209
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.12.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377411003428
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.12.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Hongyong & Shen, Yanjun & Yu, Qiang & Flerchinger, Gerald N. & Zhang, Yongqiang & Liu, Changming & Zhang, Xiying, 2010. "Effect of precipitation change on water balance and WUE of the winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(8), pages 1139-1145, August.
    2. Passioura, John, 2006. "Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce--from breeding to field management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 176-196, February.
    3. Richards, Richard A., 2006. "Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 197-211, February.
    4. Zwart, Sander J. & Bastiaanssen, Wim G. M., 2004. "Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 115-133, September.
    5. Martyniak, Ludwika, 2008. "Response of spring cereals to a deficit of atmospheric precipitation in the particular stages of plant growth and development," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 171-178, March.
    6. Li, Hongjun & Zheng, Li & Lei, Yuping & Li, Chunqiang & Liu, Zhijun & Zhang, Shengwei, 2008. "Estimation of water consumption and crop water productivity of winter wheat in North China Plain using remote sensing technology," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1271-1278, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomáš Středa & Jana Hajzlerová & Jhonny Alba-Mejía & Ivana Jovanović & Nicole Frantová & Hana Středová, 2024. "Quo vadis, breeding for an efficient root system, in the era of climate change?," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(4), pages 181-211.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiaolin & Tong, Ling & Niu, Jun & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng, 2017. "Spatio-temporal distribution of irrigation water productivity and its driving factors for cereal crops in Hexi Corridor, Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 55-63.
    2. Sharma, Bharat & Molden, D. & Cook, Simon, 2015. "Water use efficiency in agriculture: measurement, current situation and trends," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Sharma, Bharat & Molden, D. & Cook, Simon, 2015. "Water use efficiency in agriculture: measurement, current situation and trends," IWMI Books, Reports H046807, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Fang, Q.X. & Ma, L. & Green, T.R. & Yu, Q. & Wang, T.D. & Ahuja, L.R., 2010. "Water resources and water use efficiency in the North China Plain: Current status and agronomic management options," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(8), pages 1102-1116, August.
    5. Sun, Qinping & Kröbel, Roland & Müller, Torsten & Römheld, Volker & Cui, Zhenling & Zhang, Fusuo & Chen, Xinping, 2011. "Optimization of yield and water-use of different cropping systems for sustainable groundwater use in North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 808-814, March.
    6. Mansour, Elsayed & Abdul-Hamid, Mohamed I & Yasin, Mohamed T & Qabil, Naglaa & Attia, Ahmed, 2017. "Identifying drought-tolerant genotypes of barley and their responses to various irrigation levels in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 58-67.
    7. Bouman, B. A.M., 2007. "A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spatial scales," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 93(1-3), pages 43-60, March.
    8. Yan, Nana & Wu, Bingfang, 2014. "Integrated spatial–temporal analysis of crop water productivity of winter wheat in Hai Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 24-33.
    9. Geerts, Sam & Raes, Dirk, 2009. "Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1275-1284, September.
    10. Dong, Baodi & Shi, Lei & Shi, Changhai & Qiao, Yunzhou & Liu, Mengyu & Zhang, Zhengbin, 2011. "Grain yield and water use efficiency of two types of winter wheat cultivars under different water regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 103-110.
    11. Huang, Feng & Li, Baoguo, 2010. "Assessing grain crop water productivity of China using a hydro-model-coupled-statistics approach: Part I: Method development and validation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 1077-1092, July.
    12. Yang, Yanmin & Yang, Yonghui & Moiwo, Juana Paul & Hu, Yukun, 2010. "Estimation of irrigation requirement for sustainable water resources reallocation in North China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1711-1721, November.
    13. Huang, Feng & Li, Baoguo, 2010. "Assessing grain crop water productivity of China using a hydro-model-coupled-statistics approach. Part II: Application in breadbasket basins of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1259-1268, September.
    14. Ma, Fengjiao & Gao, Hui & Eneji, A. Egrinya & Jin, Zhanzhong & Han, Lipu & Liu, Jintong, 2016. "An economic valuation of groundwater management for Agriculture in Luancheng county, North China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 28-36.
    15. Ren, Dongyang & Xu, Xu & Engel, Bernard & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2021. "A comprehensive analysis of water productivity in natural vegetation and various crops coexistent agro-ecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Immerzeel, W.W. & Gaur, A. & Zwart, S.J., 2008. "Integrating remote sensing and a process-based hydrological model to evaluate water use and productivity in a south Indian catchment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 11-24, January.
    17. Nandi, R. & Mondal, K. & Singh, K.C. & Saha, M. & Bandyopadhyay, P.K. & Ghosh, P.K., 2021. "Yield-water relationships of lentil grown under different rice establishments in Lower Gangetic Plain of India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Bonfante, A. & Monaco, E. & Manna, P. & De Mascellis, R. & Basile, A. & Buonanno, M. & Cantilena, G. & Esposito, A. & Tedeschi, A. & De Michele, C. & Belfiore, O. & Catapano, I. & Ludeno, G. & Salinas, 2019. "LCIS DSS—An irrigation supporting system for water use efficiency improvement in precision agriculture: A maize case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Gonçalves, Ivo Zution & Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Campos, Isidro & Neale, Michael R., 2020. "Temporal and spatial variations of irrigation water use for commercial corn fields in Central Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Mohammad Alauddin & Upali A. Amarasinghe & Bharat R. Sharma, 2014. "Four decades of rice water productivity in Bangladesh: A spatio-temporal analysis of district level panel data," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 51-64.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:104:y:2012:i:c:p:203-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.