IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3234-d517474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Urban Agriculture for Evidence-Based Food Planning: A Case Study in Chengdu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Wang

    (National Agricultural Science & Technology Center, Chengdu 610213, China
    Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 200240, China
    Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chengdu 610213, China)

  • Li Zhu

    (National Agricultural Science & Technology Center, Chengdu 610213, China)

  • Yuanhao Bing

    (National Agricultural Science & Technology Center, Chengdu 610213, China)

  • Liwei Chen

    (National Agricultural Science & Technology Center, Chengdu 610213, China)

  • Shulang Fei

    (National Agricultural Science & Technology Center, Chengdu 610213, China
    Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chengdu 610213, China)

Abstract

Along the rapid pace of urbanization, urban agriculture is increasingly recognized as an important tool of sustainable food and nutrition supply, while contributing to the resilience and sustainability of cities from various dimensions. From a governance point of view, it is fundamental to systemically assess the urban agriculture based on local context for evidence-based food planning. In China, values of urban agriculture are being noticed in recent years, with attempts emerging to involve urban agriculture in urban planning and agriculture strategies. However, clear definition to identify the scope and holistic approaches to assess and monitor local urban agriculture are still lacking. The paper took Chengdu as the study area, to conduct a thorough assessment of the foundation, capacity, practices, functions, opportunities, and challenges of the urban agriculture locally. Building on these results, the study further developed an indicator framework tailored to Chengdu’s conditions and city objectives, for in-depth evaluation and monitoring of local urban agriculture by themes, following which a pilot in-depth assessment was conducted in Chengdu using the indicator framework. The outcome of this research for the first time provided an overall characterization of the urban agriculture in Chengdu and assessment tools tailored to urban agriculture in Chinese cities, establishing a good basis for strategic local food system planning and contributing to the formation of the Chinese paradigm in urban agriculture research.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Wang & Li Zhu & Yuanhao Bing & Liwei Chen & Shulang Fei, 2021. "Assessment of Urban Agriculture for Evidence-Based Food Planning: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3234-:d:517474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3234/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3234/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Martin & Elvira Molin, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of an Urban Vertical Hydroponic Farming System in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshitaka Miyake & Yuta Uchiyama & Yoshinori Fujihira & Ryo Kohsaka, 2021. "Towards Evidence Based Policy Making in GIAHS: Convention Theory and Effects of GIAHS Registration on the Wholesale and Retail Trade of Traditional and Local Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Alesandros Glaros & Geoff Luehr & Zhenzhong Si & Steffanie Scott, 2022. "Ecological Civilization in Practice: An Exploratory Study of Urban Agriculture in Four Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Tong Zou & Ayotunde Dawodu & Eugenio Mangi & Ali Cheshmehzangi, 2023. "Exploring Current Trends, Gaps & Challenges in Sustainable Food Systems Studies: The Need of Developing Urban Food Systems Frameworks for Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Francesc Fusté-Forné & Maria Fusté Forné, 2021. "Urban Gardens as Sustainable Attractions for Children in Family Tourism," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hemeng Zhou & Kathrin Specht & Caitlin K. Kirby, 2022. "Consumers’ and Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Indoor Agritecture in Shanghai (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Heino Pesch & Louis Louw, 2023. "Exploring the Industrial Symbiosis Potential of Plant Factories during the Initial Establishment Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Xu, Zhitao & Elomri, Adel & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Kerbache, Laoucine & El Mekkawy, Tarek, 2022. "Decisions on design and planning of solar-assisted hydroponic farms under various subsidy schemes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Edwin Villagran & Rommel Leon & Andrea Rodriguez & Jorge Jaramillo, 2020. "3D Numerical Analysis of the Natural Ventilation Behavior in a Colombian Greenhouse Established in Warm Climate Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Adrián Csordás & István Füzesi, 2023. "The Impact of Technophobia on Vertical Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Michael Martin & Sofia Poulikidou & Elvira Molin, 2019. "Exploring the Environmental Performance of Urban Symbiosis for Vertical Hydroponic Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Heino Pesch & Louis Louw, 2023. "Evaluating the Economic Feasibility of Plant Factory Scenarios That Produce Biomass for Biorefining Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-36, January.
    9. Bouadila, Salwa & Baddadi, Sara & Skouri, Safa & Ayed, Rabeb, 2022. "Assessing heating and cooling needs of hydroponic sheltered system in mediterranean climate: A case study sustainable fodder production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    10. Neiko V. Nikolov & Atanas Z. Atanasov & Boris I. Evstatiev & Valentin N. Vladut & Sorin-Stefan Biris, 2023. "Design of a Small-Scale Hydroponic System for Indoor Farming of Leafy Vegetables," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Katarzyna Świąder & Dražena Čermak & Danuta Gajewska & Katarzyna Najman & Anna Piotrowska & Eliza Kostyra, 2023. "Opportunities and Constraints for Creating Edible Cities and Accessing Wholesome Functional Foods in a Sustainable Way," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Martina Artmann & Kathrin Specht & Jan Vávra & Marius Rommel, 2021. "Introduction to the Special Issue “A Systemic Perspective on Urban Food Supply: Assessing Different Types of Urban Agriculture”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Dsouza, Ajwal & Newman, Lenore & Graham, Thomas & Fraser, Evan D.G., 2023. "Exploring the landscape of controlled environment agriculture research: A systematic scoping review of trends and topics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3234-:d:517474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.