IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2024-01-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption and Industrial Production on CO2 Emissions in Turkic Republics by Panel Data Analysis Method

Author

Listed:
  • Ainur Yergazievna Yesbolova

    (M.Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent, Kazakhstan)

  • Tolkyn Abdulova

    (Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University, Uralsk, Kazakhstan)

  • Murat Nurgabylov

    (International Taraz innovative institute named after Sherhan Murtaza, Taraz, Kazakhstan)

  • Sapargul Yessenbekova

    (Peoples’ Friendship University named after Academician A. Kuatbekov, Shymkent, Kazakhstan)

  • Svetlana Turalina

    (Tashenov University, Shymkent, Kazakhstan)

  • Gulnara Baytaeva

    (Zhetysu University named after I. Zhansugurov, Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan)

  • Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy

    (Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of energy consumption and industrial production on CO2 emissions in the Turkic Republics using the Panel Data method for the period 2000-2020. However, Turkmenistan was excluded from the analysis because the relevant data could not be accessed. Data from Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan were analyzed. CO2 emission creates problems in terms of environment and sustainability and is a parameter that all countries and international organizations carefully monitor and try to reduce. Using panel data regression, this study examined whether renewable energy and industrial production and countries impact CO2 emissions. The findings revealed that as renewable energy consumption increases, CO2 emissions decrease. However, the effect of industrial production on CO2 emissions was not statistically significant. These results demonstrate that the industrial development of selected countries does not pose a CO2 emission problem. A comparison of countries showed that the high CO2 emission value for Kazakhstan was also reflected in the panel data regression findings, and among the four countries, the country effect was positive only for Kazakhstan. This study is noteworthy in revealing the effect of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions. To reduce CO2 emissions and gain a better understanding of the impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions, future studies should include both developing countries and OECD countries, and compare the results obtained from them.

Suggested Citation

  • Ainur Yergazievna Yesbolova & Tolkyn Abdulova & Murat Nurgabylov & Sapargul Yessenbekova & Svetlana Turalina & Gulnara Baytaeva & Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy, 2024. "Analysis of the Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption and Industrial Production on CO2 Emissions in Turkic Republics by Panel Data Analysis Method," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 480-487, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2024-01-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/15261/7697
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/15261
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gulmira Issayeva & Zhanar Dyussembekova & Aina B. Aidarova & Adelina B. Makhatova & Gulnar Lukhmanova & Dariya Absemetova & Artur Bolganbayev, 2023. "The Relationship between Renewable Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, and Industrial Production Index: The Case of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Saule Bekzhanova & Gulzhanat Tayauova & Serik Akhanov & Gulnar B. Tuleshova & Artur Bolganbayev & Gulnara M. Moldogaziyeva, 2023. "The Relationship between Gold and Oil Prices and the Stock Market Returns of Kazakh Energy Companies: Comparison of the pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 Periods," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 8-14, September.
    3. Tazhikul Mashirova & Karlygash Tastanbekova & Murat Nurgabylov & Gulnar Lukhmanova & Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy, 2023. "Analysis of the Relationship between the Highest Price and the Trading Volume of the Energy Company Shares in Kazakhstan with Frequency Domain Causality Method," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 22-27, July.
    4. Zhazira Taibek & Indira Kozhamkulova & Almas Kuralbayev & Bagdat K. Spanova & Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy, 2023. "Analysis of the Effect of Oil and Energy Production on Health and Education Expenditures in Kazakhstan with Autoregressive Distributed Lag Method," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 215-221, March.
    5. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2021. "General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 13-50, January.
    6. Dinmukhamed Kelesbayev & Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy & Artur Bolganbayev & Sabit Baimaganbetov, 2022. "The Effects of the Oil Price Shock on Inflation: The Case of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 477-481, May.
    7. Jorg Breitung, 2005. "A Parametric approach to the Estimation of Cointegration Vectors in Panel Data," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 151-173.
    8. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2004. "A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1127-1177, July.
    9. Gaukhar Niyetalina & Elmira Balapanova & Almas Kuralbayev & Gulnar Lukhmanova & Artur Bolganbayev, 2023. "The Relationship of Energy Generation from Fossil Fuels, Low Carbon Resources, and Renewable Resources and Inflation within the Framework of Taylor s Rule: The Case of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 9-15, July.
    10. repec:bla:obuest:v:61:y:1999:i:0:p:631-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2006. "Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 967-1012, July.
    12. Artur Bolganbayev & Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy & Sabit Baimaganbetov & Dinmukhamed Kelesbayev, 2021. "The Effect of Oil Prices on the Economic Growth of Oil Exporting Countries Bordering the Caspian Sea: Panel Data Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 432-437.
    13. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & Afolabi Otitoju & Martha Ajibola Otitoju & Adekunle Oke, 2020. "The Impact of Energy Consumption and Economic Growth on Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Taylor, Mark P. & Sarno, Lucio, 1998. "The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 281-312, December.
    15. Josep Lluís Carrion-i-Silvestre & Tomás del Barrio-Castro & Enrique López-Bazo, 2005. "Breaking the panels: An application to the GDP per capita," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 8(2), pages 159-175, July.
    16. Kaddour Hadri, 2000. "Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 3(2), pages 148-161.
    17. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    18. Shahriyar Mukhtarov & Sugra Humbatova & Ilgar Seyfullayev & Yashar Kalbiyev, 2020. "The effect of financial development on energy consumption in the case of Kazakhstan," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 75-88, January.
    19. Janice Boucher Breuer & Robert McNown & Myles Wallace, 2002. "Series‐specific Unit Root Tests with Panel Data," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 64(5), pages 527-546, December.
    20. Baltaim Sabenova & Indira Baubekova & Gulmira Issayeva & Zarema Bigeldiyeva & Artur Bolganbayev, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Volatility Structures of Stock Index and Energy Company Returns in Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 200-206, March.
    21. repec:bla:obuest:v:64:y:2002:i:5:p:527-46 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Im, K.S. & Pesaran, M.H., 2003. "On The Panel Unit Root Tests Using Nonlinear Instrumental Variables," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0347, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    23. G. S. Maddala & Shaowen Wu, 1999. "A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(S1), pages 631-652, November.
    24. Andhyka Tyaz Nugraha & Nor Hasni Osman, 2019. "CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, and Household Expenditure for Indonesia: Evidence from Cointegration and Vector Error Correction Model," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 291-298.
    25. Zhanar Dyussembekova & Aina B. Aidarova & Elmira Balapanova & Dilmina Kuatova & Gaukhar Zh. Seitkhamzina & Artur Bolganbayev, 2023. "The Effect of Freight and Passenger Transportation and Energy Production on Economic Growth in the Framework of Macro-Economic Indicators: The Case of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 74-80, November.
    26. Levin, Andrew & Lin, Chien-Fu & James Chu, Chia-Shang, 2002. "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saken Ualikhanovich Abdibekov & Yelena Evgenevna Gridneva & Gulnar Shaimardanovna Kaliakparova & Nazigul Amankeldikyzy Amankeldi & Gulmira Amangeldiyevna Perneyeva & Bauyrzhan Susaruly Kulbay & Kundyz, 2024. "The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Agricultural and Industrial Production, and Economic Growth: ARDL Border Value Approach in the Case of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 79-86, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aizhan Ibyzhanova & Zamzagul Sultanova & Zhanna T. Aliyeva & Karlygash Tastanbekova & Saken Ualikhanovich Abdibekov & Bagila Mustafayeva & Kundyz Myrzabekkyzy, 2024. "The Effect of Energy Production and Foreign Trade on the Economic Growth of Turkic Republics: A Study Using Panel Data Analysis Method," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 126-134, March.
    2. Katircioglu, Salih Turan & Sertoglu, Kamil & Candemir, Mehmet & Mercan, Mehmet, 2015. "Oil price movements and macroeconomic performance: Evidence from twenty-six OECD countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 257-270.
    3. Yıldırım, Seda & Gedikli, Ayfer & Erdoğan, Seyfettin & Yıldırım, Durmuş Çağrı, 2020. "Natural resources rents-financial development nexus: Evidence from sixteen developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Sevgi SEZER, 2017. "The effects of real exchange rates and income on the trade balance: A second generation panel data analysis for transition economies and Turkey," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(611), S), pages 171-186, Summer.
    5. Aydin, Celil & Esen, Ömer, 2018. "Does the level of energy intensity matter in the effect of energy consumption on the growth of transition economies? Evidence from dynamic panel threshold analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 185-195.
    6. Tsangyao Chang & Tsung-Pao Wu & Rangan Gupta, 2015. "Are house prices in South Africa really nonstationary? Evidence from SPSM-based panel KSS test with a Fourier function," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 32-53, January.
    7. Martin Wagner, 2008. "On PPP, unit roots and panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 229-249, September.
    8. Ömer Yalçınkaya & İbrahim Hüseyni & Ali Kemal Çelik, 2017. "The Impact of Total Factor Productivity on Economic Growth for Developed and Emerging Countries: A Second-generation Panel Data Analysis," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 11(4), pages 404-417, November.
    9. Dina Azhgaliyeva, 2013. "What Makes Oil Revenue Funds Effective," International Conference on Energy, Regional Integration and Socio-economic Development 6023, EcoMod.
    10. Qaiser Munir & Sook Ching Kok & Kasim Mansur, 2019. "External Shocks, Structural Breaks And Unemployment Hysteresis In Selected Asian Countries," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(03), pages 575-600, June.
    11. Romero-Ávila, Diego, 2009. "Are OECD consumption-income ratios stationary after all?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 107-117, January.
    12. Hamit-Haggar, Mahamat, 2012. "Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 358-364.
    13. Valérie Mignon & Christophe Hurlin, 2005. "Une synthèse des tests de racine unitaire sur données de panel," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 169(3), pages 253-294.
    14. Josep Carrion-i-Silvestre & Vicente German-Soto, 2009. "Panel data stochastic convergence analysis of the Mexican regions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 303-327, October.
    15. António Afonso & Christophe Rault, 2010. "What do we really know about fiscal sustainability in the EU? A panel data diagnostic," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 731-755, January.
    16. Huang, Lingyun & Zou, Yanjun, 2020. "How to promote energy transition in China: From the perspectives of interregional relocation and environmental regulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Dobnik, Frauke, 2011. "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Revisited: Structural Breaks and Cross-section Dependence," Ruhr Economic Papers 303, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    18. Breitung, Jörg & Pesaran, Mohammad Hashem, 2005. "Unit roots and cointegration in panels," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2005,42, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    19. Mehmet MERCAN, 2014. "Feldstein-Horioka Hipotezinin AB-15 ve Turkiye Ekonomisi icin Sinanmasi: Yatay Kesit Bagimliligi Altinda Yapisal Kirilmali Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 14(2), pages 231-245.
    20. repec:wsr:wpaper:y:2009:i:029 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Rafiq, Shuddhasattwa & Nielsen, Ingrid & Smyth, Russell, 2017. "Effect of internal migration on the environment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 31-44.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Panel Regression Analysis; Turkic Republics; Kazakhstan; Renewable Energy; CO2 Emission; Industrial Production Index;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C20 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2024-01-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.