IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2022-02-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land-use in the Electric Colombian System: Hidden Impacts and Risks of Large-scale Renewable Projects

Author

Listed:
  • A.M. Ramirez-Tovar

    (Institute of Studies for Sustainability, Universidad Aut noma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia,)

  • Ricardo Moreno-Chuquen

    (Department of Energy and Mechanical, Universidad Aut noma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia)

  • Renata Moreno-Quintero

    (Department of Social Sciences and Economics, Universidad Aut noma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia.)

Abstract

In the sustainable development era, massive land-use for electricity production represents a crucial challenge for environmental and social systems. Available information about the use of land in this sector is limited, for that reason in this paper we include the power density methodology to evaluate land-use in Colombia to produce electricity. The power density metric depicts the relation between energy produced and area used in this process, considering extraction-conversion-storage. The analysis between power electricity generation and land-use is made for the Colombian electric system, finding that there is no direct relationship between the area occupied by a generation plant and the electricity produced, since the evidence does not show that at larger areas greater power is obtained. Hydropower plants have large spectrum values of power densities, depending on the dam construction purpose (river-flow control). Fossil-fired power plants require less land for its production even including the fuel extraction area. Photovoltaic and wind-power plants in this comparison have the lowest power density values, accordingly, they require far larger areas and represent a risk for sustainability in this perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • A.M. Ramirez-Tovar & Ricardo Moreno-Chuquen & Renata Moreno-Quintero, 2022. "Land-use in the Electric Colombian System: Hidden Impacts and Risks of Large-scale Renewable Projects," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 127-134, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-02-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/11631/6665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/11631
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo Moreno & Diego Larrahondo, 2021. "The First Auction of Non-Conventional Renewable Energy in Colombia: Results and Perspectives," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 528-535.
    2. Fearnside, Philip M., 2016. "Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydroelectric Dams in Brazilian Amazonia: Implications for the Aluminum Industry," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 48-65.
    3. J. Restrepo-Trujillo & Ricardo Moreno-Chuquen & Francy Nelly Jim nez-Garc a, 2020. "Strategies of Expansion for Electric Power Systems Based on Hydroelectric Plants in the Context of Climate Change: Case of Analysis of Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 66-74.
    4. Ricardo Moreno & Sergio A. Cantillo & Lilian A. Carrillo-Rodriguez, 2021. "Risk Analysis of Firm Energy Coverage in Colombia in the Medium Term," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 220-226.
    5. Ekins, Paul & Simon, Sandrine & Deutsch, Lisa & Folke, Carl & De Groot, Rudolf, 2003. "A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2-3), pages 165-185, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian M. Moreno Rocha & Jorge D. Melo Boiler & Samira M. Mu oz Pizarro & Leidy M. Mora Higuera & William R. Insignares Conde, 2022. "Evolution, Challenges, and Perspective in the Implementation of Projects with Renewable Energy Sources: Colombia Case," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 230-236, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    2. Daniel Buda & Hoinaru Razvan & Mocanu Mihaela & Roman Aureliana-Geta, 2019. "IAS 41 and beyond for a sustainable EU agriculture," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 829-839, May.
    3. Genesis T. Yengoh & Frederick Ato Armah & Edward Ebo Onumah, 2010. "Paths to Attaining Food Security: The Case of Cameroon," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Margherita Casini & Francesca Gagliardi & Gianni Betti, 2018. "Sustainable Development Goals indicators: a methodological proposal for a fuzzy Super Index in the Mediterranean area," Department of Economics University of Siena 782, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    5. Sylvie Ferrari & Sébastien Lavaud & Jean-Christophe Pereau, 2012. "Critical natural capital, ecological resilience and sustainable wetland management: a french case study," Post-Print hal-00799051, HAL.
    6. Sharmila Moganadas & Victor Corral-Verdugo & Santhi Ramanathan, 2013. "Toward systemic campus sustainability: gauging dimensions of sustainable development via a motivational and perception-based approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1443-1464, December.
    7. Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin F., 2009. "Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2008-2020, May.
    8. Silvio Franco & Barbara Pancino & Angelo Martella, 2021. "Mapping National Environmental Sustainability Distribution by Ecological Footprint: The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Dietz, Simon & Neumayer, Eric, 2007. "Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 617-626, March.
    10. Kasztelan Armand, 2014. "A comparative analysis of Lubelskie and Kujawsko-Pomorskie voivodships in the context of environmental competitiveness of regions," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 23(23), pages 87-96, March.
    11. Aleksandra Pieloch-Babiarz & Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska, 2021. "An impact of macroeconomic stabilization on the sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises: the case of Central and Eastern European Countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8669-8698, June.
    12. Jean-François Ruault & Alice Dupré La Tour & André Evette & Sandrine Allain & Jean-Marc Callois, 2022. "A biodiversity-employment framework to protect biodiversity," Post-Print hal-03365820, HAL.
    13. Beça, Pedro & Santos, Rui, 2010. "Measuring sustainable welfare: A new approach to the ISEW," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 810-819, February.
    14. Mohammad Nur Nobi, 2021. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kaptai Dam in Rangamati District, Chittagong, Bangladesh," Papers 2109.05419, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    15. Peng Li & Zhen He & Jianwu Cai & Jing Zhang & Marye Belete & Jinsong Deng & Shizong Wang, 2022. "Identify the Impacts of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on Watershed Sediment and Water Yields Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    17. Maria Carmela Aprile & Damiano Fiorillo, 2016. "Water Conservation Behavior and Environmental Concerns," Discussion Papers 6_2016, CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    18. Diego Larrahondo & Ricardo Moreno & Harold R. Chamorro & Francisco Gonzalez-Longatt, 2021. "Comparative Performance of Multi-Period ACOPF and Multi-Period DCOPF under High Integration of Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Jukka Mähönen, 2020. "Comprehensive Approach to Relevant and Reliable Reporting in Europe: A Dream Impossible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-38, June.
    20. Tolmasquim, Maurício T. & de Barros Correia, Tiago & Addas Porto, Natália & Kruger, Wikus, 2021. "Electricity market design and renewable energy auctions: The case of Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Power density; electricity; Land-use; Sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q24 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Land
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2022-02-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.