IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-08q00001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of federal indemnification on livestock biosecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Muhammad

    (Mississippi State University)

  • Keithly Jones

    (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service)

Abstract

This paper provided a theoretical framework for analyzing the relationship between federal indemnification and livestock biosecurity. Theoretical results show that the responsiveness of biosecurity to indemnity payments depends on a number of factors. First, the responsiveness of biosecurity will depend on the effectiveness of preventive measures in decreasing the growth in animal susceptibility. Second it was found that the responsiveness of disease abatement to changes in an indemnity was an increasing function of the marginal product of abatement. It was also found that abatement was a decreasing function of the rate at which the marginal product diminishes and that the proportion of damages indemnified has a direct affect on abatement. Lastly, it was shown that losses that extend beyond animals values may decrease the impact of indemnification on abatement levels and under certain conditions the level of biosecurity (with added losses)may exceed the no-indemnity optimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Muhammad & Keithly Jones, 2008. "The impact of federal indemnification on livestock biosecurity," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 17(10), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-08q00001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2008/Volume17/EB-08Q00001A.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith H. Coble & Thomas O. Knight & Rulon D. Pope & Jeffery R. Williams, 1997. "An Expected-Indemnity Approach to the Measurement of Moral Hazard in Crop Insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(1), pages 216-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kobayashi, Mimako & Melkonyan, Tigran A., 2011. "Strategic Incentives in Biosecurity Actions: Theoretical and Empirical Analyses," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(2), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Wang, Tong & Hennessy, David A., 2010. "Livestock Disease Indemnity Design When Biosecurity Externalities Exist," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 60944, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weaver, Robert D. & Kim, Taeho, 2002. "Designing Crop Insurance to Manage Moral Hazard Costs," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24784, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. F. G. Santeramo & B. K. Goodwin & F. Adinolfi & F. Capitanio, 2016. "Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Programme," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 639-657, September.
    3. Francis Tsiboe & Jesse Tack, 2022. "Utilizing Topographic and Soil Features to Improve Rating for Farm‐Level Insurance Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 52-69, January.
    4. Wang, H. Holly & Hanson, Steven D. & Black, J. Roy, 2003. "Efficiency Costs of Subsidy Rules for Crop Insurance," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(01), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Rejesus, Roderick M. & Lovell, Ashley C. & Little, Bertis B. & Cross, Mike H., 2003. "Determinants of Anomalous Prevented Planting Claims: Theory and Evidence from Crop Insurance," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 32(2), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Rogna, Marco & Schamel, Günter & Weissensteiner, Alex, 2019. "Choosing Between Hail Insurance and Anti-Hail Nets: A Simple Model and a Simulation among Apples Producers in South Tyrol," 2019: Trading for Good - Agricultural Trade in the Context of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation... Symposium, June 23-25, 2019, Seville, Spain 312593, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    7. Liang, Yan & Coble, Keith H., 2009. "A Cost Function Analysis of Crop Insurance Moral Hazard and Agricultural Chemical Use," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49485, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Coble, Keith H., 2000. "Farm Risk Policy At A Crossroad," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(01), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Chalise, Lekhnath & Coble, Keith H. & Barnett, Barry J. & Miller, J. Corey, 2017. "Developing Area-Triggered Whole Farm Revenue Insurance," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(01), pages 1-18, January.
    10. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2008:i:10:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Sharma, Sankalp & Walters, Cory G., 2018. "Influence of Farm and Lease Type on Crop Insurance Returns," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273881, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Fabio G Santeramo, 2019. "I Learn, You Learn, We Gain Experience in Crop Insurance Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 284-304, June.
    13. Deng, Xiaohui & Barnett, Barry J. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & Yu, Yingzhuo & Garcia y Garcia, Axel, 2008. "Alternative Crop Insurance Indexes," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(01), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Pelka, Niels & Weber, Ron & Musshoff, Oliver, 2015. "Does weather matter? How rainfall shocks affect credit risk in agricultural micro-finance," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212617, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Pelka, Niels & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2013. "Das Risikoreduzierungspotenzial von Wetterderivaten im Ackerbau: Einfachindizes versus Mischindizes," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(04), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Xudong Rao & Yuehua Zhang, 2020. "Livestock insurance, moral hazard, and farmers’ decisions: a field experiment among hog farms in China," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(1), pages 134-156, January.
    17. Biram, Hunter D. & Tack, Jesse & Nehring, Richard F., 2022. "Does Crop Insurance Participation Impact Quality-Adjusted Pesticide Usage?," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322136, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Sherrick, Bruce J., 2001. "The Accuracy Of Producer Expectations: Evidence And Implications For Insurance Valuation," 2001 Regional Committee NC-221, October 1-2, 2001, McLean, Virginia 132390, Regional Research Committee NC-1014: Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.
    19. Anton, Jesus & Kimura, Shingo, 2009. "Farm Level Analysis of Risk, and Risk Management Strategies and Policies: Evidence from German Crop Farms," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51729, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Makki Shiva S. & Somwaru Agapi L., 2007. "Assessing Adverse Selection in Crop Insurance Markets: An Application of Parametric and Nonparametric Methods," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, May.
    21. Pelka, Niels & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2013. "Das Risikoreduzierungspotenzial von Wetterderivaten im Ackerbau: Einfachindizes versus Mischindizes," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 62(4).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    livestock;

    JEL classification:

    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-08q00001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.