IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/journl/y2016i2p37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Employee Share Ownership Schemes on Firm Performance: the Case of Zimbabwean Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Maxwell Sandada

    (University of Zimbabwe)

  • Kamunyaru Batanai Basil

    (University of Zimbabwe)

  • Asphat Muposhi

    (Vaal University of Technology)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of employee share ownership schemes on firm performance in the case of Zimbabwean companies. The study sought to provide valuable insights on the influence of this initiative on employee productivity and organisational performance in Zimbabwe. A cross sectional design was employed to collect data from Confederation of Zimbabwe Industry listed companies using simple random sampling. The study revealed that financial benefits from EOSs, employee participation, ECOS communication and percentage of shareholding have a significant positive relationship with firm performance. The study has important implications for the implementation and management of ESOs in the context of a development country such as Zimbabwe.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxwell Sandada & Kamunyaru Batanai Basil & Asphat Muposhi, 2016. "The Influence of Employee Share Ownership Schemes on Firm Performance: the Case of Zimbabwean Firms," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(12), pages 37-50, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2016:i:2:p:37-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/3029/3220
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Pendleton & Nicholas Wilson & Mike Wright, 1998. "The Perception and Effects of Share Ownership: Empirical Evidence from Employee Buy-Outs," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 99-123, March.
    2. Kruse, Douglas & Blasi, Joseph & Freeman, Richard B., 2004. "Monitoring colleagues at work: profit-sharing, employee ownership, broad-based stock options and workplace performance in the United States," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19943, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Douglas Kruse & Richard Freeman & Joseph Blasi & Robert Buchele & Adria Scharf & Loren Rodgers & Chris Mackin, 2004. "Motivating Employee-Owners In Esop Firms: Human Resource Policies And Company Performance," Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, in: Employee Participation, Firm Performance and Survival, pages 101-127, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    4. Andrew Pendleton & Andrew Robinson, 2010. "Employee Stock Ownership, Involvement, and Productivity: An Interaction-Based Approach," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(1), pages 3-29, October.
    5. Meng, Rujing & Ning, Xiangdong & Zhou, Xianming & Zhu, Hongquan, 2011. "Do ESOPs enhance firm performance? Evidence from China's reform experiment," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1541-1551, June.
    6. E. Han Kim & Paige Ouimet, 2014. "Broad-Based Employee Stock Ownership: Motives and Outcomes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(3), pages 1273-1319, June.
    7. Seppo Ikaheimo & Anders Kjellman & Jan Holmberg & Sari Jussila, 2004. "Employee stock option plans and stock market reaction: evidence from Finland," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 105-122.
    8. Ramesh Kumar Dhiman, 2009. "The elusive employee stock option plan‐productivity link: evidence from India," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 542-563, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxwell Sandada & Kamunyaru Batanai Basil & Asphat Muposhi, 2016. "The Influence of Employee Share Ownership Schemes on Firm Performance: the Case of Zimbabwean Firms," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 12(2), pages 37-50, April.
    2. MAHMOOD Athar, 2020. "Employee Stock Option Plans: A Meta-Analysis (Understanding Impact Of Esops Through Literature)," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 15(1), pages 100-114, April.
    3. Dermot McCarthy & Eoin Reeves & Tom Turner, 2010. "The impact of privatization and employee share ownership on employee commitment and citizen behaviour," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(3), pages 307-326, August.
    4. Lei Zhou & Feng Wei & Yu Kong, 2022. "Do Employee Stock Ownership Plans Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Jung, Hail & Choi, Sanghak, 2021. "The effects of employee stock ownership on stock liquidity: Evidence from the Korean market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Geert Braam & Erik Poutsma, 2015. "Broad-Based Financial Participation Plans and Their Impact on Financial Performance: Evidence from a Dutch Longitudinal Panel," De Economist, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 177-202, June.
    7. Vladimir Pecheu, 2021. "Profit Sharing as a Bargaining Weapon Against Unions," Working Papers halshs-03247551, HAL.
    8. Dasilas, Apostolos, 2024. "The nonlinear relationship between employee stock ownership plans and firm performance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Chen, Fang & Jia, Jianjun & Lin, Yuen & Xiang, George, 2022. "Should managers be incentivized with stock or options? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Prasad, Ajnesh, 2018. "When is economic inequality justified?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 855-862.
    11. Choi Sang Long & Ajagbe Akintunde Musibau, 2013. "Can Employee Share Option Scheme Improve Firm’s Performance? A Malaysian case study," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 119-128.
    12. Hongfeng Sun & Chang Liu, 2023. "Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Ross Brown & Ronald McQuaid & Robert Raeside & Matthew Dutton & Valerie Egdell & Jesus Canduela, 2019. "Buying into Capitalism? Employee Ownership in a Disconnected Era," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 62-85, March.
    14. Fathi Fakhfakh & Andrew Robinson & Aguibou Tall, 2019. "Financial Participation and Collective Conflicts: Evidence from French Firms," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 674-703, October.
    15. Kyoung Yong Kim & Pankaj C. Patel, 2020. "Broad‐Based Employee Ownership and Labour Productivity During the 2008 Recession: Evidence from Public Firms in Europe," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 396-423, June.
    16. Vladimir Pecheu, 2021. "Profit Sharing as a Bargaining Weapon Against Unions," AMSE Working Papers 2135, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    17. Erik Poutsma & Paul E. M. Ligthart & Roel Schouteten, 2005. "Employee Share Schemes in Europe. The Influence of US Multinationals," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(1), pages 99-122.
    18. Dongmin Kong & Jia Liu & Yanan Wang & Ling Zhu, 2024. "Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Corporate Environmental Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 177-199, January.
    19. Fang, Hongyan & Nofsinger, John R. & Quan, Juan, 2015. "The effects of employee stock option plans on operating performance in Chinese firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 141-159.
    20. Justo, Rachida & DeTienne, Dawn R. & Sieger, Philipp, 2015. "Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 775-792.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2016:i:2:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Nuta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.