IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v31y2014i22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unobserved population heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • James W. Vaupel

    (Syddansk Universitet)

  • Trifon Missov

    (Syddansk Universitet)

Abstract

Background: Survival models accounting for unobserved heterogeneity (frailty models) play an important role in mortality research, yet there is no article that concisely summarizes useful relationships. Objective: We present a list of important mathematical relationships that govern populations in which individuals differ from each other in unobserved ways. For some relationships we present proofs that, albeit formal, tend to be simple and intuitive. Methods: We organize the article in a progression, starting with general relationships and then turning to models with stronger and stronger assumptions. Results: We start with the general case, in which we do not assume any structure of the underlying baseline hazard, the frailty distribution, or their link to one another. Then we sequentially assume, first, a relative-risk model; second, a gamma distribution for frailty; and, finally, a Gompertz and Gompertz-Makeham specification for baseline mortality. Comments: The article might serve as a handy overall reference to frailty models, especially for mortality research.

Suggested Citation

  • James W. Vaupel & Trifon Missov, 2014. "Unobserved population heterogeneity," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(22), pages 659-686.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:31:y:2014:i:22
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol31/22/31-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.22?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Missov, Trifon I. & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2011. "Admissible mixing distributions for a general class of mixture survival models with known asymptotics," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 64-70.
    2. Kenneth Manton & Eric Stallard & James Vaupel, 1981. "Methods For Comparing The Mortality Experience of Heterogeneous Populations," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(3), pages 389-410, August.
    3. James W. Vaupel & Zhen Zhang, 2010. "Attrition in heterogeneous cohorts," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 23(26), pages 737-748.
    4. Trifon Missov, 2013. "Gamma-Gompertz life expectancy at birth," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(9), pages 259-270.
    5. Jaap H. Abbring & Gerard J. Van Den Berg, 2007. "The unobserved heterogeneity distribution in duration analysis," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(1), pages 87-99.
    6. Trifon I. Missov & Maxim S. Finkelstein, 2011. "Admissible mixing distributions for a general class of mixture survival models with known asymptotics," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2011-004, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    7. Anatoli Yashin & Ivan Iachine & Alexander Begun, 2000. "Mortality modeling: A review," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 305-332.
    8. James Vaupel & Vladimir Romo, 2003. "Decomposing change in life expectancy: A bouquet of formulas in honor of Nathan Keyfitz’s 90th birthday," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 40(2), pages 201-216, May.
    9. James W. Vaupel, 2002. "Life Expectancy at Current Rates vs. Current Conditions," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 7(8), pages 365-378.
    10. James Vaupel, 1988. "Inherited frailty and longevity," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 25(2), pages 277-287, May.
    11. Gerda Claeskens & Rosemary Nguti & Paul Janssen, 2008. "One-sided tests in shared frailty models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(1), pages 69-82, May.
    12. Kelvin K. W. Yau, 2001. "Multilevel Models for Survival Analysis with Random Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 96-102, March.
    13. John Bongaarts & Griffith Feeney, 2002. "How Long Do We Live?," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 13-29, March.
    14. James Vaupel & Kenneth Manton & Eric Stallard, 1979. "The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 16(3), pages 439-454, August.
    15. Chris Elbers & Geert Ridder, 1982. "True and Spurious Duration Dependence: The Identifiability of the Proportional Hazard Model," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 49(3), pages 403-409.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucia Zanotto & Vladimir Canudas-Romo & Stefano Mazzuco, 2021. "A Mixture-Function Mortality Model: Illustration of the Evolution of Premature Mortality," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(1), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Feehan, Dennis & Wrigley-Field, Elizabeth, 2020. "How do populations aggregate?," SocArXiv 2fkw3, Center for Open Science.
    3. Lindholm, Mathias, 2017. "A note on the connection between some classical mortality laws and proportional frailty," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 76-82.
    4. Dennis Feehan & Elizabeth Wrigley-Field, 2021. "How do populations aggregate?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(15), pages 363-378.
    5. Hui Zheng, 2020. "Unobserved population heterogeneity and dynamics of health disparities," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(34), pages 1009-1048.
    6. Andrea Verhulst & Hiram Beltran-Sanchez & Alberto Palloni, 2019. "Impact of delayed effects on human old-age mortality," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(41), pages 1167-1210.
    7. Alberto Palloni & Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez, 2017. "Discrete Barker Frailty and Warped Mortality Dynamics at Older Ages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(2), pages 655-671, April.
    8. Yifan Yang & Omer Karin & Avi Mayo & Xiaohu Song & Peipei Chen & Ana L. Santos & Ariel B. Lindner & Uri Alon, 2023. "Damage dynamics and the role of chance in the timing of E. coli cell death," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Hartemink, Nienke & Missov, Trifon I. & Caswell, Hal, 2017. "Stochasticity, heterogeneity, and variance in longevity in human populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 107-116.
    10. Anders Ledberg, 2020. "Exponential increase in mortality with age is a generic property of a simple model system of damage accumulation and death," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Alexander, Monica, 2018. "Deaths without denominators: using a matched dataset to study mortality patterns in the United States," SocArXiv q79ye, Center for Open Science.
    12. Giambattista Salinari & Gustavo De Santis, 2020. "One or more rates of ageing? The extended gamma-Gompertz model (EGG)," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(2), pages 211-236, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Virginia Zarulli, 2016. "Unobserved Heterogeneity of Frailty in the Analysis of Socioeconomic Differences in Health and Mortality," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(1), pages 55-72, February.
    2. Adriaan Kalwij, 2014. "An empirical analysis of the importance of controlling for unobserved heterogeneity when estimating the income-mortality gradient," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(30), pages 913-940.
    3. Hal Caswell, 2014. "A matrix approach to the statistics of longevity in heterogeneous frailty models," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(19), pages 553-592.
    4. Bijwaard, Govert, 2011. "Unobserved Heterogeneity in Multiple-Spell Multiple-States Duration Models," IZA Discussion Papers 5748, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Hartemink, Nienke & Missov, Trifon I. & Caswell, Hal, 2017. "Stochasticity, heterogeneity, and variance in longevity in human populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 107-116.
    6. Giambattista Salinari & Gustavo De Santis, 2020. "One or more rates of ageing? The extended gamma-Gompertz model (EGG)," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(2), pages 211-236, June.
    7. Elizabeth Wrigley-Field, 2014. "Mortality Deceleration and Mortality Selection: Three Unexpected Implications of a Simple Model," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(1), pages 51-71, February.
    8. Missov, Trifon I. & Lenart, Adam, 2013. "Gompertz–Makeham life expectancies: Expressions and applications," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 29-35.
    9. Jonas Šiaulys & Rokas Puišys, 2022. "Survival with Random Effect," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Aymric Kamega & Frédéric Planchet, 2011. "Hétérogénéité : mesure du risque d'estimation dans le cas d'une modélisation intégrant des facteurs observables," Post-Print hal-00593874, HAL.
    11. Anna Zajacova & Sarah Burgard, 2013. "Healthier, Wealthier, and Wiser: A Demonstration of Compositional Changes in Aging Cohorts Due to Selective Mortality," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(3), pages 311-324, June.
    12. Haghani, Shermineh, 2014. "Modeling hedge fund lifetimes: A dependent competing risks framework with latent exit types," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 291-320.
    13. Maxim Finkelstein, 2012. "Discussing the Strehler-Mildvan model of mortality," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 26(9), pages 191-206.
    14. Lindholm, Mathias, 2017. "A note on the connection between some classical mortality laws and proportional frailty," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 76-82.
    15. Wienke, Andreas & Kuss, Oliver, 2009. "Random effects Weibull regression model for occupational lifetime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1249-1250, August.
    16. Elizabeth Wrigley-Field, 2013. "Mortality deceleration is not informative of unobserved heterogeneity in open groups," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 11(1), pages 15-36.
    17. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2014. "Some notes on unobserved parameters (frailties) in reliability modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 99-103.
    18. Maxim S. Finkelstein, 2011. "On ordered subpopulations and population mortality at advanced ages," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2011-022, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    19. Finkelstein, Maxim, 2012. "On ordered subpopulations and population mortality at advanced ages," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(4), pages 292-299.
    20. Yann Le Cunff & Annette Baudisch & Khashayar Pakdaman, 2013. "How Evolving Heterogeneity Distributions of Resource Allocation Strategies Shape Mortality Patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unobserved heterogeneity; relative-risk models; Gompertz–Makeham law of mortality; gamma-distributed frailty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:31:y:2014:i:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.