IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2023i1p46-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Digital Self-Development among Generation Z. A Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Brindusa Mariana BEJAN

    (Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

In recent years, we are increasingly exposed to information about the activities of the young people who are part of Generation Z, as well as the role they play in society. Considering that young people are familiar and contemporary with technology, the article follows the impact of the digital self on Generation Z, the generation born between the mid-1990s and the early 2010s who have grown up in a world where digital technologies are ubiquitous. As a theoretical approach, this research examines how the use of digital technologies has shaped the identity and digital self of Generation Z. It explores how Social-Media have influenced their social relationships, self-image, and emotional well-being. Additionally, this article explores the potential consequences of a digital self, such as increased anxiety, social comparison, and addiction. The findings suggest that the digital self has become an integral aspect of identity formation for Generation Z and that understanding its impact is crucial for individuals, educators, and mental health professionals alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Brindusa Mariana BEJAN, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Self-Development among Generation Z. A Theoretical Approach," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 46-55.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2023:i:1:p:46-55
    DOI: 10.35219/eai15840409319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2023_1/Bejan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.35219/eai15840409319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alladi Venkatesh, 2016. "Social Media, Digital Self, and Privacy: A Socio-Analytical Perspective of the Consumer as the Digital Avatar," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(3), pages 378-391.
    2. Gupta, Pranjal & Harris, Judy, 2010. "How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1041-1049, September.
    3. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu Li & Pengya Ai & Annette Ding, 2023. "More Than Just Numbers: How Engagement Metrics Influence User Intention to Pay for Online Knowledge Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    2. Harun Gumus & Vedat Bal, 2016. "Analysis Of The Effect Of Quality Components Of Web 2.0 Enabled E-Commerce Websites On Electronic Word-Of-Mouth Marketing (Ewom) And On Customer Loyalty," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 979-986, July.
    3. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Zeng, Yongchao & Ju, Yanbing, 2022. "Analyzing the diffusion of competitive smart wearable devices: An agent-based multi-dimensional relative agreement model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 90-105.
    4. Shapiro, Stephen L. & Reams, Lamar & So, Kevin Kam Fung, 2019. "Is it worth the price? The role of perceived financial risk, identification, and perceived value in purchasing pay-per-view broadcasts of combat sports," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 235-246.
    5. Dubey, Subodh & Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Cats, Oded & Bansal, Prateek, 2022. "A General Framework to Forecast the Adoption of Novel Products: A Case of Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 63-95.
    6. Juan Shi & Kin Keung Lai & Ping Hu & Gang Chen, 2018. "Factors dominating individual information disseminating behavior on social networking sites," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 121-139, June.
    7. Sunita Guru & Jitendra Nenavani & Vipul Patel & Nityesh Bhatt, 2020. "Ranking of perceived risks in online shopping," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(2), pages 137-152, June.
    8. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    9. repec:aly:journl:201935 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Raffaele Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2018. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Post-Print halshs-01923196, HAL.
    11. Son, Youngdoo & Kim, Wonjoon, 2023. "Development of methodology for classification of user experience (UX) in online customer review," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Heejae Shin & Wirawan Dahana, 2017. "Asymmetric Persuasive Effects of Gain- and Loss-related Messages in Electronic Word of Mouth," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-82, November.
    13. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    14. Yen-Liang Chen & Chia-Ling Chang & An-Qiao Sung, 2021. "Predicting eWOM’s Influence on Purchase Intention Based on Helpfulness, Credibility, Information Quality and Professionalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Pappas, Nikolaos & Papatheodorou, Andreas, 2017. "Tourism and the refugee crisis in Greece: Perceptions and decision-making of accommodation providers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 31-41.
    16. Bin Guo & Shasha Zhou, 2017. "What makes population perception of review helpfulness: an information processing perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 585-608, December.
    17. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    18. Rishikesh Bhaiswar & N. Meenakshi & Deepak Chawla, 2021. "Evolution of Electronic Word of Mouth: A Systematic Literature Review Using Bibliometric Analysis of 20 Years (2000–2020)," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 215-231, September.
    19. Aditya Halim Perdana Kusuma Putra, 2024. "Learning from the Past Bridging Digital and Physical Markets: A Guidelines for Future Research Agenda of Online-to-Offline (O2O) Marketing Strategy," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 82-96, May.
    20. Liu, Zhiwei & Park, Sangwon, 2015. "What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-151.
    21. Chen, Jie & Teng, Lefa & Yu, Ying & Yu, Xueer, 2016. "The effect of online information sources on purchase intentions between consumers with high and low susceptibility to informational influence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 467-475.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2023:i:1:p:46-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.