IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dat/almana/v24y2017i2p122-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Възможности За Внедряване На Обратната Логистика В България

Author

Listed:
  • Венцислав Перков

    (Стопанска академия "Д.А.Ценов")

Abstract

Целта на изследването е да се разкрият възможностите за внедряване на обратната логистика от предприятията в България. За постигането на целта са формулирани следните задачи: изясняване същността на понятията; адаптиране и прилагане на методика за изследване на възможностите за внедряване на обратната логистика в предприятията; определяне степента на важност на обратната логистика; провеждане на графичен и корелационен анализ на дългосрочните цели и изясняване ролята на обратната логистика в стратегията за развитие на предприятията; определяне и анализ на мотивите и бариерите пред внедряване на обратната логистика. Основната теза е, че внедряването на обратната логистика от българските предприятия не е приоритет в целите и стратегиите на висшия мениджмънт поради съществуващи външни и вътрешни бариери и в бъдеще ще се възприема като възможност за по-ефективното използване на влаганите ресурси и постигане на устойчив растеж. Резултатите показват, че изследваните субекти не могат еднозначно да определят ролята на обратната логистика за постигане на дългосрочните им цели и това рефлектира върху разработването на техните стратегии. Мотивите за внедряване на обратната логистика в българските предприятия се обособяват в три групи – обществени, маркетингови и резултативни, а водещите външни бариери са „Липсата на данъчни преференции” и „Административните спънки от институциите”. Основната вътрешна бариера е „Недостатъчната ангажираност на мениджмънта”.

Suggested Citation

  • Венцислав Перков, 2017. "Възможности За Внедряване На Обратната Логистика В България," Scientific Research Almanac, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, vol. 24(2 Year 20), pages 122-148.
    • Handle: RePEc:dat:almana:v:24:y:2017:i:2:p:122-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10610/3831
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sumalee Pumpinyo & Vilas Nitivattananon, 2014. "Investigation of Barriers and Factors Affecting the Reverse Logistics of Waste Management Practice: A Case Study in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Steffen Maas & Tassilo Schuster & Evi Hartmann, 2014. "Pollution Prevention and Service Stewardship Strategies in the Third‐Party Logistics Industry: Effects on Firm Differentiation and the Moderating Role of Environmental Communication," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 38-55, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Massaroni & Alessandra Cozzolino & Mario Calabrese & Ewa Wankowicz & Maura Fiore, 2016. "Reporting di sostenibilit? degli operatori logistici in Europa: analisi degli indicatori," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 303-334.
    2. Christian Schwens & Marcus Wagner, 2019. "The role of firm-internal corporate environmental standards for organizational performance," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 823-843, September.
    3. Eugene Kang & Nguyen Bao Lam, 2023. "The impact of environmental disclosure on initial public offering underpricing: Sustainable development in Singapore," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 119-133, January.
    4. Kumar Verma Bhupendra & Shirish Sangle, 2018. "Product Stewardship Strategy: A Study of Indian Firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 124-134, March.
    5. Xin Zhang & Gang Zhao & Yingxiu Qi & Botang Li, 2019. "A Robust Fuzzy Optimization Model for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks Considering Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Noorliza Karia, 2022. "Antecedents and Consequences of Environmental Capability towards Sustainability and Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Pietro Evangelista & Lodovico Santoro & Antonio Thomas, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review from 2000–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-34, May.
    8. Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal & Mendes, Juliana Veiga & Suyama, Suzi Sanae, 2016. "Shippers and freight operators perceptions of sustainable initiatives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 173-181.
    9. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & Gupta, Shivam & Kumar, Sameer, 2021. "Green supply chain management practices and third-party logistics providers’ performances: A fuzzy-set approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Maria Vittoria Franceschelli & Gabriele Santoro & Elisa Giacosa & Roberto Quaglia, 2019. "Assessing the determinants of performance in the recycling business: Evidence from the Italian context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1086-1099, September.
    11. Bishal Baniya, 2023. "Circularity in Facility Management: Conceptualisation and Potential Areas for Circularity-Oriented Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    12. Navarro Ferronato & Carolina D’Avino & Marco Ragazzi & Vincenzo Torretta & Giovanni De Feo, 2017. "Social Surveys about Solid Waste Management within Higher Education Institutes: A Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Mark M. Davis & Euthemia Stavrulaki & Adi Wolfson, 2018. "A Framework for Increasing Sustainability in Services," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 139-153, June.
    14. Jun Xie & Wataru Nozawa & Shunsuke Managi, 2020. "The role of women on boards in corporate environmental strategy and financial performance: A global outlook," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2044-2059, September.
    15. Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang & Ziquan Xiang, 2021. "Prioritizing the Solutions to Reverse Logistics Barriers for the E-Commerce Industry in Pakistan Based on a Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Sini Laari & Juuso Töyli & Lauri Ojala, 2018. "The effect of a competitive strategy and green supply chain management on the financial and environmental performance of logistics service providers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 872-883, November.
    17. Sara Perotti & Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Marco Melacini, 2022. "Assessing the environmental impact of logistics sites through CO2eq footprint computation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1679-1694, May.
    18. Barbaglia, Martina & Bianchini, Roberto & Butticè, Vincenzo & Elia, Stefano & Mariani, Marcello M., 2023. "The role of environmental sustainability in the relocation choices of MNEs: Back to the home country or welcome in a new host country?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    19. Peter Seele & Lucia Gatti, 2017. "Greenwashing Revisited: In Search of a Typology and Accusation‐Based Definition Incorporating Legitimacy Strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 239-252, February.
    20. Jeng-Chieh Cheng & Jeen-Fong Li & Chi-Yo Huang, 2023. "Enablers for Adopting Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directives by Electronic Manufacturing Service Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-45, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    обратна логистика; стратегии; мотиви за внедряване; бариери пред внедряване;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics
    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dat:almana:v:24:y:2017:i:2:p:122-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostadin Bashev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsenobg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.