IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12743-d681697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritizing the Solutions to Reverse Logistics Barriers for the E-Commerce Industry in Pakistan Based on a Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Hamza Naseem

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Jiaqi Yang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Ziquan Xiang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

Abstract

In the past few years, reverse logistics practices have successfully managed to gain more attention in various industries and among supply chain researchers and experts. This is due to globalization, environmental concerns, and customer requirements, which have asserted industries’ concerns for reverse logistics management. In E-commerce, the process of reverse logistics originates with parcel refusal, undelivered goods, and exchanges. In developing countries like Pakistan, the adoption and implications of reverse logistics are still at their early stages. E-commerce companies give more attention to forward logistics and ignore logistics’ upstream flow in the supply chain. This study aims to identify, as well as list, the barriers and obtain the solutions to those identified barriers, and rank the barriers and their solutions so that logisticians and experts can solve them as per their priority. From the extensive literature review and experts’ opinions, we have found 14 barriers in implementing effective reverse logistics. Eight solutions to those barriers were also found from the literature review. This paper proposed the methodology based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (fuzzy-AHP), which used to get the weights of each barrier by using pairwise comparison, and fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (fuzzy-TOPSIS) method, which was adopted for the final ranking of solutions to reverse logistics. The case of the Pakistan E-commerce industry is used in the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang & Ziquan Xiang, 2021. "Prioritizing the Solutions to Reverse Logistics Barriers for the E-Commerce Industry in Pakistan Based on a Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12743-:d:681697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek & Katarzyna Antosz & Ryszard Wyczółkowski & Dariusz Mazurkiewicz & Bo Sun & Cheng Qian & Yi Ren, 2021. "Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Bouzon, Marina & Govindan, Kannan & Rodriguez, Carlos M.Taboada & Campos, Lucila M.S., 2016. "Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 182-197.
    3. Chandra Prakash & M.K. Barua, 2017. "Flexible modelling approach for evaluating reverse logistics adoption barriers using fuzzy AHP and IRP framework," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(2), pages 151-171.
    4. Vernika Agarwal & Kannan Govindan & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & P. C. Jha, 2016. "An optimization model for sustainable solutions towards implementation of reverse logistics under collaborative framework," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(4), pages 480-487, December.
    5. Sumalee Pumpinyo & Vilas Nitivattananon, 2014. "Investigation of Barriers and Factors Affecting the Reverse Logistics of Waste Management Practice: A Case Study in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    7. Muhammad Waqas & Qian-li Dong & Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Nadeem, 2018. "Critical Barriers to Implementation of Reverse Logistics in the Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study of a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2014. "Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 460-471.
    9. Heekyung An, 2008. "The Construction of Green Supply Chain Management System," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 70-79, July.
    10. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    11. Pornwasin Sirisawat & Tossapol Kiatcharoenpol, 2019. "A study of correlation for reverse logistics barriers to solutions using structural equation modelling," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(2), pages 139-159.
    12. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Towfique Rahman & Syed Mithun Ali & Nazmun Nahar & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2020. "Examining barriers to reverse logistics practices in the leather footwear industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 715-746, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas & Ángel Acevedo-Duque, 2022. "PERVAINCONSA Scale to Measure the Consumer Behavior of Online Stores of MSMEs Engaged in the Sale of Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Akide Cerci Ogmen & Ismail Ekmekci, 2022. "HEART Hybrid Methods for Assessing Human Reliability in Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plant Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Jian Huang & Qinyu Chen & Chengqing Yu, 2022. "A New Feature Based Deep Attention Sales Forecasting Model for Enterprise Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Şeyda Savalan, 2022. "An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Hybrid Methodology to Analyze Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Alkahtani & Aiman Ziout & Bashir Salah & Moath Alatefi & Abd Elatty E. Abd Elgawad & Ahmed Badwelan & Umar Syarif, 2021. "An Insight into Reverse Logistics with a Focus on Collection Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Ramanathan, Usha & He, Qile & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Sarpong, David, 2023. "Collaborative closed-loop supply chain framework for sustainable manufacturing: Evidence from the Indian packaging industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Rashmi Ranjan Swain & Swagatika Mishra & S. S. Mahapatra, 2024. "An integrated BWM–SWARA approach to identify barriers in implementing reverse logistics for an effective supply chain management: a critical study of five bottle manufacturing companies in Odisha (Ind," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(9), pages 4495-4511, September.
    4. Nebojša Brkljač & Milan Delić & Marko Orošnjak & Nenad Medić & Slavko Rakić & Ljiljana Popović, 2024. "Interdependent Influences of Reverse Logistics Implementation Barriers in the Conditions of an Emerging Economy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    6. Puppala, Harish & Peddinti, Pranav R.T. & Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan & Ahuja, Jaya & Kim, Byungmin, 2023. "Barriers to the adoption of new technologies in rural areas: The case of unmanned aerial vehicles for precision agriculture in India," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Xin Zhang & Gang Zhao & Yingxiu Qi & Botang Li, 2019. "A Robust Fuzzy Optimization Model for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks Considering Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Towfique Rahman & Syed Mithun Ali & Nazmun Nahar & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2020. "Examining barriers to reverse logistics practices in the leather footwear industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 715-746, October.
    10. Daniel Jugend & Hugo Henrique dos Santos & Susana Garrido & Regiane Máximo Siqueira & Jaime A. Mesa, 2024. "Circular product design challenges: An exploratory study on critical barriers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4825-4842, July.
    11. Ipek Kazancoglu & Yigit Kazancoglu & Emel Yarimoglu & Aysun Kahraman, 2020. "A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1477-1492, September.
    12. Wei-Ming Wang & Hsiao-Han Peng, 2020. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Urban Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Muhammad Waqas & Qian-li Dong & Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Nadeem, 2018. "Critical Barriers to Implementation of Reverse Logistics in the Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study of a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Kumar, Anil, 2021. "Analysing the drivers of customer happiness at authorized workshops and improving retention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Chukwuebuka M. U-Dominic & Ifeyinwa Juliet Orji & Modestus Okwu, 2021. "Analyzing the Barriers to Reverse Logistics (RL) Implementation: A Hybrid Model Based on IF-DEMATEL-EDAS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Deepak Lamba & Devendra K. Yadav & Akhilesh Barve & Ganapati Panda, 2020. "Prioritizing barriers in reverse logistics of E-commerce supply chain using fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 381-403, June.
    17. Bishal Baniya, 2023. "Circularity in Facility Management: Conceptualisation and Potential Areas for Circularity-Oriented Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    18. Wen-Kuo Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Man-Li Lin & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Identifying Decisive Socio-Political Sustainability Barriers in the Supply Chain of Banking Sector in India: Causality Analysis Using ISM and MICMAC," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, January.
    19. María Carmen Carnero, 2015. "Assessment of Environmental Sustainability in Health Care Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Swati Goyal & Shivi Agarwal & Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh & Trilok Mathur & Nirbhay Mathur, 2022. "Analysis of Hybrid MCDM Methods for the Performance Assessment and Ranking Public Transport Sector: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12743-:d:681697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.