IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i3p391-d92371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Surveys about Solid Waste Management within Higher Education Institutes: A Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Navarro Ferronato

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via G.B. Vico 46, I-21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Carolina D’Avino

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, I-84084 Fisciano, Italy)

  • Marco Ragazzi

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineer, University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, I-38050 Trento, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Torretta

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via G.B. Vico 46, I-21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Giovanni De Feo

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, I-84084 Fisciano, Italy)

Abstract

Solid waste mismanagement is a social burden that requires the introduction of reliable public policies, including recycling principles and technological facilities. However, the development of recycling plans is a real issue for municipal governments, since it involves psychological and cultural factors, both in developed and developing countries. Questionnaire survey is an important tool for evaluating which solid waste management policy is suited for each specific study area, involving citizens and stakeholders. The aim of this paper is to evaluate what approach should be applied for social surveys in higher education institutes, comparing developing and developed countries. Italy is the developed country analyzed, where two universities in different cities are compared, while La Paz (Bolivia) is the emerging reality considered. The research conducted in La Paz led us to understand that, although recycling rates are low (about 8%), many students (56.96%) separate up to half of the waste produced at home. At the same time, about 53% of those interviewed do not know the recycling practices implemented by the informal sector which is the one that constantly act for improving the recycling rates of the city. Low technological acceptance is instead underlined in the high income country, since there is a common negative opinion concerning the introduction of landfills and incinerators near residential areas (49% disagree). A comparison of the methodologies adopted for the two case studies is introduced whereas investigations results are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Navarro Ferronato & Carolina D’Avino & Marco Ragazzi & Vincenzo Torretta & Giovanni De Feo, 2017. "Social Surveys about Solid Waste Management within Higher Education Institutes: A Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:391-:d:92371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/391/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/391/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhujie Chu & Wenna Wang & Bairong Wang & Jun Zhuang, 2016. "Research on Factors Influencing Municipal Household Solid Waste Separate Collection: Bayesian Belief Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Abayomi Samuel Oyekale, 2015. "Factors Explaining Households’ Cash Payment for Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling Behaviors in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Sumalee Pumpinyo & Vilas Nitivattananon, 2014. "Investigation of Barriers and Factors Affecting the Reverse Logistics of Waste Management Practice: A Case Study in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Víctor Corral Verdugo, 2012. "The positive psychology of sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 651-666, October.
    5. Vincenzo Torretta & Navarro Ferronato & Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis & Athanasia K. Tolkou & Michela Airoldi, 2016. "Novel and Conventional Technologies for Landfill Leachates Treatment: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-39, December.
    6. Elena Cristina Rada & Chiara Bresciani & Eleonora Girelli & Marco Ragazzi & Marco Schiavon & Vincenzo Torretta, 2016. "Analysis and Measures to Improve Waste Management in Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Elena Simina Lakatos & Viorel Dan & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Laura Bacali & Andreea Maria Ciobanu, 2016. "How Supportive Are Romanian Consumers of the Circular Economy Concept: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. da Cruz, Nuno F. & Ferreira, Sandra & Cabral, Marta & Simões, Pedro & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2014. "Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59755, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel A. Salas & Paulina Criollo & Angel D. Ramirez, 2021. "The Role of Higher Education Institutions in the Implementation of Circular Economy in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Asif Iqbal & Yasar Abdullah & Abdul Sattar Nizami & Imran Ali Sultan & Faiza Sharif, 2022. "Assessment of Solid Waste Management System in Pakistan and Sustainable Model from Environmental and Economic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    3. P. Giovani Palafox-Alcantar & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Christopher D. F. Rogers, 2021. "Current and Future Professional Insights on Cooperation towards Circular Economy Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Jenny Gutierrez-Lopez & Ronald G. McGarvey & Christine Costello & Damon M. Hall, 2023. "Decision Support Frameworks in Solid Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Sustainability and Social Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-31, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreea Simona Saseanu & Rodica-Manuela Gogonea & Simona Ioana Ghita & Radu Şerban Zaharia, 2019. "The Impact of Education and Residential Environment on Long-Term Waste Management Behavior in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Gradus, Raymond H.J.M. & Nillesen, Paul H.L. & Dijkgraaf, Elbert & van Koppen, Rick J., 2017. "A Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastic Waste," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 22-28.
    3. Julius Grund & Antje Brock, 2019. "Why We Should Empty Pandora’s Box to Create a Sustainable Future: Hope, Sustainability and Its Implications for Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Cao, Jian & Lu, Bo & Chen, Yangyang & Zhang, Xuemei & Zhai, Guangshu & Zhou, Gengui & Jiang, Boxin & Schnoor, Jerald L., 2016. "Extended producer responsibility system in China improves e-waste recycling: Government policies, enterprise, and public awareness," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 882-894.
    5. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Sharmila Moganadas & Victor Corral-Verdugo & Santhi Ramanathan, 2013. "Toward systemic campus sustainability: gauging dimensions of sustainable development via a motivational and perception-based approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1443-1464, December.
    7. Konstantin Sommer, 2024. "The Chinese waste import ban and the emergence of waste havens within Europe," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-053/VI, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Mathias Zannakis & Sverker Molander & Lars-Olof Johansson, 2019. "On the Relationship between Pro-Environmental Behavior, Experienced Monetary Costs, and Psychological Gains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Onwezen, Marleen C. & Antonides, Gerrit & Bartels, Jos, 2013. "The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 141-153.
    10. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    11. Sisi Wu & Xuan Gong & Yunfei Wang & Jian Cao, 2022. "Consumer Cognition and Management Perspective on Express Packaging Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Chuanhui Liao & Hui Li, 2019. "Environmental Education, Knowledge, and High School Students’ Intention toward Separation of Solid Waste on Campus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Verena Radulovic, 2018. "Portrayals in Print: Media Depictions of the Informal Sector’s Involvement in Managing E-Waste in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Gaetano Musella & Massimiliano Agovino & Mariaconcetta Casaccia & Alessandro Crociata, 2019. "Evaluating waste collection management: the case of macro-areas and municipalities in Italy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2857-2889, December.
    15. Elena Simina Lakatos & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Viorel Dan & Alina Oana Ciomos & Oana Adriana Crisan & Ghita Barsan, 2018. "Studies and Investigation about the Attitude towards Sustainable Production, Consumption and Waste Generation in Line with Circular Economy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Andrea Szilagyi & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Laura Bacali & Elena-Simina Lakatos & Andreea-Loredana Birgovan, 2022. "Consumers in the Circular Economy: A Path Analysis of the Underlying Factors of Purchasing Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    17. P. Giovani Palafox-Alcantar & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Christopher D. F. Rogers, 2021. "Current and Future Professional Insights on Cooperation towards Circular Economy Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Lu Xiao & Rongrong Fan & Chaojie Wang & Jun Wang, 2020. "Policy Analyses on Promoting the Recycling of Express Packages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Elena Simina Lakatos & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Andrea Szilagyi & Andreea Loredana Bîrgovan & Elena Cristina Rada, 2023. "Smokers’ Attitude and Behavior towards Cigarette Littering in Romania: A Survey-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-10, August.
    20. Elena Cristina Rada & Elena Romenovna Magaril & Marco Schiavon & Anzhelika Karaeva & Maxim Chashchin & Vincenzo Torretta, 2020. "MSW Management in Universities: Sharing Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:391-:d:92371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.