IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v28y2002i1p143-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Human Capital to Organizational Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques Bélanger

Abstract

In view of current changes in the sphere of production and in the nature of work, there is no doubt of the necessity for individual and public investments in human capital formation. But starting from this premise, the paper stresses the need to consider both the formation and the use of employees' knowledge. The commitment to transform individual knowledge into organizational efficiency relies largely on social dynamics and its understanding requires that we make linkages between the individual, the organizational, and the institutional levels of analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Bélanger, 2002. "From Human Capital to Organizational Learning," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 28(1), pages 143-148, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:28:y:2002:i:1:p:143-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28200203%2928%3A1%3C143%3AFHCTOL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marsden, David, 1999. "A Theory of Employment Systems: Micro-Foundations of Societal Diversity," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198294221.
    2. Edwards, P. K., 1990. "The politics of conflict and consent : How the labor contract really works," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 41-61, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Storper & Lena Levinas & Alejandro Mercado-Celis, 2007. "Society, Community, and Development: A Tale of Two Regions," Post-Print hal-01053957, HAL.
    2. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    3. Ian Kessler & Paul Heron & Sue Dopson, 2013. "Indeterminacy and the Regulation of Task Allocation: The Shape of Support Roles in Healthcare," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(2), pages 310-332, June.
    4. Marsden, David & Cañibano, Almudena, 2009. "Participation in organisations: economic approaches," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 25167, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Gatti, Donatella, 2000. "Competence, knowledge, and the labour market: the role of complementarities," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 00-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Wood, Geoffrey & Dibben, Pauline & Stride, Chris & Webster, Edward, 2011. "HRM in Mozambique: Homogenization, path dependence or segmented business system?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 31-41, January.
    7. David Marsden, 2015. "The future of the German industrial relations model [Die Zukunft des deutschen Modells der Arbeitsbeziehungen]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 48(2), pages 169-187, August.
    8. Jim Stanford, 2017. "The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 382-401, September.
    9. David Marsden, 2006. "Individual Employee Voice: Renegotiation and Performance Management in Public Services," CEP Discussion Papers dp0752, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. David Marsden, 2010. "The End of National Models in Employment Relations?," CEP Discussion Papers dp0998, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    11. David Marsden, 2004. "The ‘Network Economy’ and Models of the Employment Contract," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 659-684, December.
    12. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2014. "History of the British Industrial Relations Field Reconsidered: Getting from the Webbs to the New Employment Relations Paradigm," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 1-31, March.
    13. Linda Clarke & Christine Wall, 2000. "Craft versus industry: the division of labour in European housing construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 689-698, December.
    14. Rien Huiskamp & Frits Kluytmans, 2004. "Between Employment Relationships and Market Relationships: Dilemmas for HR Management," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(3), pages 381-398.
    15. Michael Storper & Lena Levinas & Alejandro Mercado-Celis, 2007. "Society, Community, and Development: A Tale of Two Regions," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01053957, HAL.
    16. HASHIMOTO Yuki, 2017. "Highly Skilled Immigrants' Occupational Choices and the Japanese Employment System," Discussion papers 17059, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    17. Stephan Kampelmann & François Rycx, 2011. "Does institutional diversity account for pay rules in Germany and Belgium?," DULBEA Working Papers 11-12, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    18. Roland Erne & Marco Hauptmeier & Valeria Pulignano & Peter Turnbull, 2024. "Introduction to a Special Issue: Social Europe: The Changing Contours of Transnational Employment Relations in the European Union," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(5), pages 643-658, October.
    19. Martin Krzywdzinski, 2017. "Accounting for Cross-Country Differences in Employee Involvement Practices: Comparative Case Studies in Germany, Brazil and China," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 321-346, June.
    20. van der Velden, Rolf & Bijlsma, Ineke, 2017. "Skill effort: a new theoretical perspective on the relation between skills, skill use, mismatches, and wages," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:28:y:2002:i:1:p:143-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.