IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2013i1serghied.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interorganizational Innovation Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Dan SERGHIE

    (Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Romania)

Abstract

The directions of research on innovation or on the staging of innovative processes progress have evaluated over time from an innovational perspective constraint within an activity pursued by the entrepreneur (regarded as an entity creating possible and numerous innovative combinations) to an innovational perspective (induced in innovative processes and structures) framed and carried wider within the organizational internal environment, as response triggered and driven by market requirements. Nowadays, innovation is approached from the perspective of development in networks and system organizations. This latest innovation perspective by relating the areas of knowledge from which to reclaim constituent elements of the process, allowed researchers to focus on the study of the sequencing of actions (from generation to design and then to marketing innovation) as a process generated and conducted in networks, communities of innovation in systems and groups of companies or structures such as double helix or triple helix, in which the collaborative paradigm plays a central role. These structures include companies, individuals, universities and public organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan SERGHIE, 2013. "Interorganizational Innovation Dynamics," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 340-347, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2013:i:1:serghied
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_1_41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cusmano, Lucia & Morrison, Andrea & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2010. "Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector: A Comparative Study of Chile, Italy, and South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 1588-1602, November.
    2. Pehrsson, Anders, 2008. "Strategy antecedents of modes of entry into foreign markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 132-140, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cmj:journl:y:2013:i:28:mateis is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Stefan MATEI, 2013. "Strategies To Promote Wine Products On Foreign Markets Through The Network Distribution Of Goods," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 363-373, June.
    3. Gerhard REINECKE & Anne POSTHUMA, 2019. "The link between economic and social upgrading in global supply chains: Experiences from the Southern Cone," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 677-703, December.
    4. Geert Duysters & Myriam Cloodt & Wilfred Schoenmakers & Jojo Jacob, 2015. "Internationalisation Efforts of Chinese and Indian Companies: An Empirical Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 169-186, April.
    5. George Vlahos, 2020. "Farming System Transformation Impacts on Landscape: A Case Study on Quality Wine Production in a Highly Contested Agricultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Safargholi, Alireza, 2024. "International experience of a manager; toward a new conceptualization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4).
    7. Lechowski, Grzegorz, 2019. "Beyond "dependent development" in a high-tech industry? The interplay between domestic institutions and transnational sectoral governance in the trajectories of emerging Polish IT firms [," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2018-302r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, revised 2019.
    8. Lorenzo Cassi & Andrea Morrison & Roberta Rabellotti, 2015. "Proximity and Scientific Collaboration: Evidence from the Global Wine Industry," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 205-219, April.
    9. Marie Ferru & Marie-Pierre Renée Bes & Michel Grossetti, 2011. "Measuring social proximity in the geography of innovation," Post-Print halshs-01395667, HAL.
    10. Dhikra Chebbi Nekhili & Mehdi Nekhili & Frédéric Nlemvo, 2009. "Gouvernance des activités de R&D à l’étranger par les firmes multinationales:contribution de la théorie fondée sur les ressource," Working Papers CREGO 1090502, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    11. Andrea Caragliu & Camilla Lenzi & Camilla Lenzi, 2013. "Smart upgrading innovation strategies in a traditional industry: Evidence from the wine production in the province of Arezzo," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(4), pages 435-452, November.
    12. Özcan, Gül Berna & Coronado Mondragon, Adrian E. & Harindranath, G., 2018. "Strategic entry and operational integration of emerging market firms: The case of Cemex, Beko and Tata Steel in the UK," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 242-254.
    13. Farinelli, Fulvia, 2013. "Innovation and Learning Dynamics in the Chilean and Argentine Wine Industries," Working Papers 164653, American Association of Wine Economists.
    14. Britta Niklas & Jean‐Marie Cardebat & Robin M. Back & Davide Gaeta & Vicente Pinilla & João Rebelo & Roberto Jara‐Rojas & Guenter Schamel, 2022. "Wine industry perceptions and reactions to the COVID‐19 crisis in the Old and New Worlds: Do business models make a difference?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 810-831, October.
    15. Zhi Shen & Francisco Puig & Justin Paul, 2017. "Foreign Market Entry Mode Research: A Review and Research Agenda," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 429-456, October.
    16. Lechowski, Grzegorz, 2018. "Beyond "dependent development" in a high-tech industry? The interplay between domestic institutions and transnational sectoral governance in the trajectories of emerging Polish IT firms," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2018-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Xinyu Yang & Weidong Liu, 2022. "Agricultural Production Networks and Upgrading from a Global–Local Perspective: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Felzensztein, Christian & Stringer, Christina & Benson-Rea, Maureen & Freeman, Susan, 2014. "International marketing strategies in industrial clusters: Insights from the Southern Hemisphere," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 837-846.
    19. Daniel Coq-Huelva & Bolier Torres-Navarrete & Carlos Bueno-Suárez, 2018. "Indigenous worldviews and Western conventions: Sumak Kawsay and cocoa production in Ecuadorian Amazonia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(1), pages 163-179, March.
    20. Hennart, Jean-François & Sheng, Hsia Hua & Pimenta, Gustavo, 2015. "Local complementary inputs as drivers of entry mode choices: The case of US investments in Brazil," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 466-475.
    21. Marola, Elena & Schöpfner, Judith & Gallemore, Caleb & Jespersen, Kristjan, 2020. "The bandwidth problem in telecoupled systems governance: Certifying sustainable winemaking in Australia and Chile," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cultural realities; Interorganizational connection networks; Practices; Disruptive innovation; Competence; Open Source;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2013:i:1:serghied. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.