IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v57y2011i3id46-2010-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative advantages and complementarity of Sino-US agricultural trade: An empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanmin SHUAI

    (Schoolof Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China)

  • Xi WANG

    (China Social Sciences Press, Beijing, China)

Abstract

By adopting the RCA, CMS, TCD, SI and TCI models, this paper has made an empirical analysis of the comparative advantages and complementarity of the agricultural trade between China and the United States in terms of sixteen major agricultural products since 1997. The results indicate that (1) the exporting agri-products of China and the United States reflect the characteristics of the resource endowment of each country; (2) China's agri-product competitiveness has decreased after its WTO accession, while the country's agri-export structure has been upgraded; (3) Sino-US agri-trade dependency continues to rise, and the U.S. relies more on China than China does on the U.S.; (4) China and the United Sates have good complementarity in the agricultural trade, which tends to strengthen after the China's accession to the WTO. Policy implications are proposed accordingly based on these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanmin SHUAI & Xi WANG, 2011. "Comparative advantages and complementarity of Sino-US agricultural trade: An empirical analysis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 118-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:57:y:2011:i:3:id:46-2010-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/46/2010-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/46/2010-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/46/2010-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/46/2010-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wailes, Eric J. & Fang, Cheng & Tuan, Francis C., 1998. "U.S.-China Agricultural Trade: Constraints and Potential," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 113-126, July.
    2. Wailes, Eric J. & Fang, Cheng & Tuan, Francis C., 1998. "U.S.-China Agricultural Trade: Constraints and Potential," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1214, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Wailes, Eric J. & Fang, Cheng & Tuan, Francis C., 1998. "U.S.-China Agricultural Trade: Constraints And Potential," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Matthew Gorton & Sophia Davidova & Martin Banse & Alistair Bailey, 2006. "The International Competitiveness of Hungarian Agriculture: Past Performance and Future Projections," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 69-84.
    5. Ziping Wu & Ken Thomson, 2003. "Changes in Chinese Competitiveness in Major Food Products: Implications for WTO Membership," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 117-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Glauber & Simon Lester, 2020. "China - Tariff Rate Quotas for Certain Agricultural Products: Against the Grain: Can the WTO Open Chinese Markets?," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/91, European University Institute.
    2. Kevin Chen & Lian Xu & Yufeng Duan, 2000. "Ex-Post competitiveness of China's export in agri-food products: 1980-96," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 281-294.
    3. Xiao Lyu & Yanan Wang & Yuntai Zhao & Shandong Niu, 2022. "Spatio‐temporal pattern and mechanism of coordinated development of “population–land–industry–money” in rural areas of three provinces in Northeast China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1333-1361, September.
    4. Irina Pilvere & Aleksejs Nipers & Agnese Krievina & Ilze Upite & Daniels Kotovs, 2022. "LASAM Model: An Important Tool in the Decision Support System for Policymakers and Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Jámbor, Attila & Kovács, Sándor & Somai, Miklós, 2016. "Tíz év az Európai Unióban - az új tagországok agrárteljesítményei [A decade in the EU: the agricultural performances of the new member-states]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 260-284.
    6. Cheng Fang & Frank H. Fuller, 1998. "Feed-Grain Consumption by Traditional Pork-Producing Households in China," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 98-wp203, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    7. repec:bla:eurcho:v:8:y:2009:i:specialissuechina:p:10-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Csaba Csaki & Attila Jambor, 2019. "Convergence or divergence - Transition in agriculture of Central and Eastern Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States revisited," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 160-174.
    9. Jambor, Attila & Sirone Varadi, Julia, 2014. "10 years of EU membership: winners and losers in the agri-food sector of the new member states," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182736, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Colin A. Carter & Funing Zhong & Jing Zhu, 2009. "Development of Chinese Agriculture since WTO Accession," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 8(2), pages 10-16, August.
    11. Aneta Jarosz-Angowska & Marek Angowski & Magdalena Kakol & Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula, 2020. "Agricultural Competitive Potential and Competitive Position in the International Trade of Agricultural and Food Products in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 779-803.
    12. Jozsef TOTH & Imre FERTO, 2017. "Innovation in the Hungarian food economy," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 43-51.
    13. McErlean, Seamus & Wu, Ziping, 2003. "Regional agricultural labour productivity convergence in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 237-252, June.
    14. Lobanov, Mikhail (Лобанов, Михаил) & Zvezdvanovic-Lobanova, Jelena (Звезданович-Лобанова, Елена), 2017. "Specifics of Agricultural Policy in the Countries of Central-Eastern and South-Eastern Europe in 1990–2010s [Особенности Аграрной Политики В Странах Центрально- И Юго-Восточной Европы В 1990-2010-Х," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 150-173, June.
    15. Cheng Fang & Frank H. Fuller, 1998. "Feed-Grain Consumption by Traditional Pork-Producing Households in China," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 98-wp203, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    16. Gale, Fred & Hansen, James & Jewison, Michael, 2015. "China’s Growing Demand for Agricultural Imports," Economic Information Bulletin 198800, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:57:y:2011:i:3:id:46-2010-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.