IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rlecon/v5y2009i1n13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of Quality of Life Losses Associated with Nonfatal Injury: Insights from Jury Verdict Data

Author

Listed:
  • Aiken Deborah Vaughn

    (U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission)

  • Zamula William W.

    (U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission)

Abstract

Evaluations of the societal burden associated with injury typically employ a cost of illness (COI) framework, focusing on direct costs, such as medical costs, and indirect costs, such as reduced productivity. However, nonfatal injuries that have long-lasting or permanent consequences can significantly reduce the quality of life for those affected. While COI evaluations are useful in demonstrating the economic burden attributable to injury, they typically do not cover quality of life losses. This study estimates the value of quality of life losses associated with consumer product injuries. We use ex post data based on jury awards in product liability lawsuits involving nonfatal product-related injuries. By combining data on monetary compensation awarded in these cases with estimates of the reduction in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) due to the injury suffered, we are able to estimate the component awarded for quality of life losses. Our findings suggest that these awards are rational and systematic, and that the most significant determinant appears to be injury severity, measured as the QALY loss. The values for life and quality of life losses implied by jury awards appear reasonable (if not somewhat low) when compared to the values obtained in the value of a statistical life literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiken Deborah Vaughn & Zamula William W., 2009. "Valuation of Quality of Life Losses Associated with Nonfatal Injury: Insights from Jury Verdict Data," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 293-310, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:5:y:2009:i:1:n:13
    DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1230
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1555-5879.1230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janusz R. Mrozek & Laura O. Taylor, 2002. "What determines the value of life? a meta-analysis," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 253-270.
    2. Richard A. Hofler & John A. List, 2004. "Valuation on the Frontier: Calibrating Actual and Hypothetical Statements of Value," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(1), pages 213-221.
    3. Cohen, Mark A. & Miller, Ted R., 2003. ""Willingness to award" nonmonetary damages and the implied value of life from jury awards," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 165-181, June.
    4. Finkelstein, Eric A. & Corso, Phaedra S. & Miller, Ted R., 2006. "The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195179484.
    5. Viscusi, W. Kip, 1988. "Pain and suffering in product liability cases: Systematic compensation or capricious awards?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 203-220, December.
    6. Begoña Álvarez-Farizo & Nick Hanley, 2006. "Improving the Process of Valuing Non-Market Benefits: Combining Citizens’ Juries with Choice Modelling," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(3), pages 465-478.
    7. Gregory B. Rodgers, 1993. "Estimating Jury Compensation for Pain and Suffering in Product Liability Cases Involving Nonfatal Personal Injury," Journal of Forensic Economics, National Association of Forensic Economics, vol. 6(3), pages 251-262, September.
    8. Bauer, Paul W., 1990. "Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1-2), pages 39-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark A. Cohen & David P. Farrington, 2021. "Appropriate Measurement And Use Of “Costs Of Crime” In Policy Analysis: Benefit‐Cost Analysis Of Criminal Justice Policies Has Come Of Age," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 284-293, January.
    2. John D. Graham & Joice Chang, 2015. "Reducing the Risk of Injury from Table Saw Use: The Potential Benefits and Costs of Automatic Protection," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 307-317, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith Stan V. & Zaloshnja Eduard & Miller Ted & Smith David A. & Spicer Rebecca S., 2008. "Jury Verdicts in Drunken Driving Cases," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 475-498, December.
    2. Zhou, J., 2010. "Access to justice : An economic approach," Other publications TiSEM 9d70f451-35c4-4878-92bf-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Cohen, Mark A. & Miller, Ted R., 2003. ""Willingness to award" nonmonetary damages and the implied value of life from jury awards," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 165-181, June.
    4. Cass R. Sunstein, 2008. "Illusory Losses," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(S2), pages 157-194, June.
    5. Hasan, Iftekhar & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2002. "Organizational Form and Expense Preference: Spanish Experience," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 135-150, April.
    6. Wu, Yanrui, 1995. "The productive efficiency of Chinese iron and steel firms A stochastic frontier analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 215-222, September.
    7. Dhehibi, Boubaker & Lachaal, Lassaad & Elloumi, Mohamed & Messaoud, Emna B., 2007. "Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Tunisian Citrus Growing Sector," 103rd Seminar, April 23-25, 2007, Barcelona, Spain 9391, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Stephen M. Miller & Terrence M. Clauretie & Thomas M. Springer, 2006. "Economies Of Scale And Cost Efficiencies: A Panel‐Data Stochastic‐Frontier Analysis Of Real Estate Investment Trusts," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 74(4), pages 483-499, July.
    9. Sandra Schaffner & Hannes Spengler, 2005. "Der Einfluss unbeobachteter Heterogenität auf kompensatorische Lohndifferentiale und den Wert eines statistischen Lebens: eine mikroökonometrische Parallelanalyse mit IABS und SOEP," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 539, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Yun‐chien Chang & Theodore Eisenberg & Han‐Wei Ho & Martin T. Wells, 2015. "Pain and Suffering Damages in Wrongful Death Cases: An Empirical Study," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 128-160, March.
    11. Chung-Hua Shen, 2005. "Cost efficiency and banking performances in a partial universal banking system: application of the panel smooth threshold model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 993-1009.
    12. Kenter, Jasper O. & Bryce, Rosalind & Christie, Michael & Cooper, Nigel & Hockley, Neal & Irvine, Katherine N. & Fazey, Ioan & O’Brien, Liz & Orchard-Webb, Johanne & Ravenscroft, Neil & Raymond, Chris, 2016. "Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 358-371.
    13. Tung Liu, 2020. "Measuring Technical, Allocative inefficiency, and Cost Inefficiency by Applying Duality Theory," Working Papers 202001, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Jun 2020.
    14. Nicolai V. Kuminoff, 2018. "Can Understanding Spatial Equilibria Enhance Benefit Transfers for Environmental Policy Evaluation?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(3), pages 591-608, March.
    15. William Griffiths & Xiaohui Zhang & Xueyan Zhao, 2010. "A Stochastic Frontier Model for Discrete Ordinal Outcomes: A Health Production Function," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1092, The University of Melbourne.
    16. Aaron Sojourner, "undated". "Partial identification of willingness-to-pay using shape restrictions with an application to the value of a statistical life," Working Papers 0110, Human Resources and Labor Studies, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus).
    17. Coelli, Tim J. & Battese, George E., 1996. "Identification Of Factors Which Influence The Technical Inefficiency Of Indian Farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(2), pages 1-26, August.
    18. Abhiman Das & K. R. Sanmugam, 2004. "Efficiency of Indian commercial banks during the reform period," Industrial Organization 0410005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Luc Baumstark & Claude Ménard & William Roy & Anne Yvrande-Billon, 2005. "Modes de gestion et efficience des opérateurs dans le secteur des transports urbains de personnes," Post-Print halshs-00103116, HAL.
    20. Atheendar S. Venkataramani & K.R. Shanmugam & Jennifer Prah Ruger, 2010. "Health, Technical Efficiency, And Agricultural Production In Indian Districts," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:5:y:2009:i:1:n:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.