IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v7y2016i2p171-188n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Trends in Australian Nonprofit Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Onyx Jenny

    (UTS – Business, Broadway, Sydney New South Wales, Australia)

  • Cham Liz

    (UTS – Business, Broadway, Sydney New South Wales, Australia)

  • Dalton Bronwen

    (UTS – Business, Broadway, Sydney New South Wales, Australia)

Abstract

There has been a large growth in nonprofits in Australia over the past 30 years. This paper will chart some of the key current policy trends that have helped shape the sector. The huge investment in the nonprofit sector by government, particularly since the mid 1990s coincided with a strong ideological shift to a neoliberal economic agenda. There was a concerted effort to bring nonprofits under the control of government policy. This has lead to greater competition among nonprofits, the growth of large charities at the expense of small local organisations, and a greater emphasis on adopting business models. Those nonprofit organisations that provide a community development role have been particularly under threat. However while much of the nonprofit world in Australia is increasingly driven by neoliberal, business oriented demands, another alternative phenomenon is emerging, particularly among young people and largely out of the gaze of public scrutiny. As fast as the state finds a way of controlling the productive energy of the nonprofit sector, the sector itself finds a way of curtailing that control, or of creating new ways of operating that go beyond existing structures and rules of operating.

Suggested Citation

  • Onyx Jenny & Cham Liz & Dalton Bronwen, 2016. "Current Trends in Australian Nonprofit Policy," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 171-188, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:171-188:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2015-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0023
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2015-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfred M. DOCKERY & Thorsten STROMBACK, 2001. "Devolving public employment services: Preliminary assessment of the Australian experiment," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 140(4), pages 429-451, December.
    2. Commission, Productivity, 2010. "Contribution of the Not-for-Profit Sector," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Bruttel, 2005. "Are Employment Zones Successful? Evidence From the First Four Years," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 20(4), pages 389-403, November.
    2. Hall, Matthew & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2017. "Accounting, non-governmental organizations and civil society: The importance of nonprofit organizations to understanding accounting, organizations and society," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-5.
    3. Syed Muhammad Waqar Hussain & Munir Hussain, 2014. "Factors influencing the employees’ job placement through recruitment agencies in Karachi, Pakistan," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 7(2), pages 79-106, December.
    4. Tim Tenbensel & Judith Dwyer & Josée Lavoie, 2014. "How Not to Kill the Golden Goose: Reconceptualizing accountability environments of third-sector organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(7), pages 925-944, October.
    5. Bruttel, Oliver, 2002. "Die Privatisierung der öffentlichen Arbeitsverwaltung am Beispiel Australiens," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment FS I 02-214, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Winterhager, Henrik & Heinze, Anja & Spermann, Alexander, 2006. "Deregulating job placement in Europe: A microeconometric evaluation of an innovative voucher scheme in Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 505-517, August.
    7. Lorne Cummings & Maria Dyball & Jessica (Jin Hua) Chen, 2010. "Voluntary Disclosures as a Mechanism for Defining Entity Status in Australian Not-for-Profit Organisations," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 154-164, June.
    8. Danula K. Gamage & Pedro S. Martins, 2018. "Evaluating Public-Private Partnerships in Employment Services: The Case of the UK Work Programme," Working Papers 87, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    9. Kappelides, Pam & Spoor, Jennifer, 2019. "Managing sport volunteers with a disability: Human resource management implications," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 694-707.
    10. Daff, Lyn & Parker, Lee D., 2021. "A conceptual model of accountants' communication inside not-for-profit organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    11. Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "Die Privatisierung der öffentlichen Arbeitsvermittlung : Erfahrungen aus Australien, den Niederlanden und Großbritannien (The privatisation of public employment services * experiences made in Australi," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 38(1), pages 7-29.
    12. Carolyn J. Cordery & Dalice Sim & Tony Zijl & Gary Monroe, 2017. "Differentiated regulation: the case of charities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 131-164, March.
    13. Kretschmer, Anne, 2005. "Das australische Arbeitsvermittlungssystem: Vorbild für Deutschland?," Beiträge zur angewandten Wirtschaftsforschung 8, University of Münster, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster (CAWM).
    14. Michael Weber, 2016. "The short-run and long-run effects of decentralizing public employment services," ifo Working Paper Series 209, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    15. Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "Die Privatisierung der öffentlichen Arbeitsvermittlung : Erfahrungen aus Australien, den Niederlanden und Großbritannien (The privatisation of public employment services * experiences made in Australi," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 38(1), pages 7-29.
    16. Jade Wong & Andreas Ortman, 2013. "Do Donors Care About the Price of Giving? A Review of the Evidence, with Some Theory to Organize It," Discussion Papers 2013-22, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    17. Martin Loosemore & Jemma Bridgeman, 2017. "Corporate volunteering in the construction industry: motivations, costs and benefits," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 641-653, October.
    18. Paul Oslington, 2005. "Contracting‐Out of Assistance to the Unemployed: Implications of the Australian Experiment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(252), pages 30-37, March.
    19. Jenny Green & Bronwen Dalton, 2016. "Out of the Shadows: Using Value Pluralism to Make Explicit Economic Values in Not-for-Profit Business Strategies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 299-312, December.
    20. David Cappo & Fiona Verity, 2014. "Social Inclusion and Integrative Practices," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 24-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:171-188:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.