IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v12y2021i1p189-197n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on the Relationship between the Government and Civil Society Organizations during the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Israeli Case

Author

Listed:
  • Schmid Hillel

    (Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel)

Abstract

The paper analyzes the relations between the government and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. The paper presents the inconsistent policy of the government, which has been influenced by various interest groups and the very limited financial support allocated to CSOs during the health, economic and social crisis. The paper describes the government’s alienated attitude toward the CSOs as well as the reasons for that behavior. Special attention is devoted to the government’s misunderstanding of the mission and roles of CSOs in modern society, especially at times of crisis and national disasters. The paper also analyzes the organizational and strategic behavior of CSOs toward the government, which has also contributed to the alienated attitude of the government toward them. I argue that relations between CSOs and the government should be based on more trust, mutuality, and understanding on the part of both actors in order to change power-dependence relations, and that there is a need to establish more cross-sectoral partnerships for the benefit of citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmid Hillel, 2021. "Reflections on the Relationship between the Government and Civil Society Organizations during the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Israeli Case," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 189-197, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:189-197:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2021-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2021-0003
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2021-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louise Brown & Stephen P. Osborne, 2013. "Risk and Innovation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 186-208, February.
    2. Hillel Schmid, 2003. "Rethinking the policy of contracting out Social Services to non-governmental organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 307-323, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata Gałązka-Sobotka & Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka & Iwona Kowalska-Bobko & Hanna Kelm & Karolina Szymaniec-Mlicka, 2021. "HB-HTA as an implementation problem in Polish health policy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    4. Klas Palm & Johan Lilja, 2021. "On the road to Agenda 2030 together in a complex alliance of Swedish public authorities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9564-9580, June.
    5. Schmid, Hillel, 2007. "Children and youth at risk in Israel: Findings and recommendations to improve their well-being," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1114-1128, August.
    6. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin de Jong & Andreas Klinke, 2021. "Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-532, March.
    7. Sophie Flemig & Stephen Osborne & Tony Kinder, 2016. "Risky business—reconceptualizing risk and innovation in public services," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 425-432, September.
    8. Arwin van Buuren & Jasper Eshuis & Nanny Bressers, 2015. "The Governance of Innovation in Dutch Regional Water Management: Organizing fit between organizational values and innovative concepts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 679-697, May.
    9. Stolt, Ragnar & Blomqvist, Paula & Winblad, Ulrika, 2011. "Privatization of social services: Quality differences in Swedish elderly care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 560-567, February.
    10. Torugsa, Nuttaneeya (Ann) & Arundel, Anthony, 2017. "Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 900-910.
    11. Almog-Bar Michal, 2017. "Insider Status and Outsider Tactics: Advocacy Tactics of Human Service Nonprofits in the Age of New Public Governance," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 411-428, December.
    12. Signe Phil-Thingvad & Kurt Klaudi Klausen, 2019. "Managing The Implementation Of Innovation Strategies In Public Service Organisation — How Managers May Support Employees Innovative Work Behaviour," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    14. Guo, Fenghua & Huo, Peiyun & Song, Hui & Zhang, Duolei & Zhou, Lei, 2024. "Does tax symmetry improve corporate innovation investment? Evidence from the change policy of loss carrying forward period in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 591-602.
    15. Stephen P. Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Isabel Vidal & Tony Kinder, 2014. "A Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organizations?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 165-172, February.
    16. Viktorija Šimanauskienė & Vidmantė Giedraitytė & Olga Navickienė, 2021. "The Role of Military Leadership in Shaping Innovative Personnel Behaviour: The Case of the Lithuanian Armed Forces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Tan, Si Ying & Taeihagh, Araz & Tripathi, Abhas, 2021. "Tensions and antagonistic interactions of risks and ethics of using robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Fuglsang, Lars & Hansen, Anne Vorre, 2022. "Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    19. Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech, 2018. "How Practices of Managing Partnerships Contributes to the Value Creation—Public–Social Partnership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Monia Castellini & Vincenzo Riso, 2020. "Risk Management and Management Control System, a close relationship in process: Isomorphism in the Italian Municipalities," Working Papers 2020039, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:189-197:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.