IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v10y2014i2p9n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using random forests to estimate win probability before each play of an NFL game

Author

Listed:
  • Lock Dennis

    (Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Nettleton Dan

    (Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

Abstract

Before any play of a National Football League (NFL) game, the probability that a given team will win depends on many situational variables (such as time remaining, yards to go for a first down, field position and current score) as well as the relative quality of the two teams as quantified by the Las Vegas point spread. We use a random forest method to combine pre-play variables to estimate Win Probability (WP) before any play of an NFL game. When a subset of NFL play-by-play data for the 12 seasons from 2001 to 2012 is used as a training dataset, our method provides WP estimates that resemble true win probability and accurately predict game outcomes, especially in the later stages of games. In addition to being intrinsically interesting in real time to observers of an NFL football game, our WP estimates can provide useful evaluations of plays and, in some cases, coaching decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lock Dennis & Nettleton Dan, 2014. "Using random forests to estimate win probability before each play of an NFL game," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 197-205, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:2:p:9:n:10
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2013-0100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2013-0100
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2013-0100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chandler Gabriel & Stevens Guy, 2012. "An Exploratory Study of Minor League Baseball Statistics," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Mills Brian M. & Salaga Steven, 2011. "Using Tree Ensembles to Analyze National Baseball Hall of Fame Voting Patterns: An Application to Discrimination in BBWAA Voting," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Lin, Yi & Jeon, Yongho, 2006. "Random Forests and Adaptive Nearest Neighbors," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 578-590, June.
    4. Fry Michael J. & Shukairy F. Alan, 2012. "Searching for Momentum in the NFL," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Freiman Michael H., 2010. "Using Random Forests and Simulated Annealing to Predict Probabilities of Election to the Baseball Hall of Fame," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-37, April.
    6. Buttrey Samuel E & Washburn Alan R & Price Wilson L, 2011. "Estimating NHL Scoring Rates," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. E. Hill, 2022. "In-game win probability models for Canadian football," Journal of Business Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 164-178, July.
    2. Daniel Cervone & Alex D’Amour & Luke Bornn & Kirk Goldsberry, 2016. "A Multiresolution Stochastic Process Model for Predicting Basketball Possession Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 585-599, April.
    3. Yurko Ronald & Ventura Samuel & Horowitz Maksim, 2019. "nflWAR: a reproducible method for offensive player evaluation in football," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 163-183, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goldstein Benjamin A & Polley Eric C & Briggs Farren B. S., 2011. "Random Forests for Genetic Association Studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, July.
    2. N. David Pifer & Christopher M. McLeod & William J. Travis & Colten R. Castleberry, 2020. "Who Should Sign a Professional Baseball Contract? Quantifying the Financial Opportunity Costs of Major League Draftees," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(7), pages 746-780, October.
    3. Borup, Daniel & Christensen, Bent Jesper & Mühlbach, Nicolaj Søndergaard & Nielsen, Mikkel Slot, 2023. "Targeting predictors in random forest regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 841-868.
    4. Jerinsh Jeyapaulraj & Dhruv Desai & Peter Chu & Dhagash Mehta & Stefano Pasquali & Philip Sommer, 2022. "Supervised similarity learning for corporate bonds using Random Forest proximities," Papers 2207.04368, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    5. Sexton, Joseph & Laake, Petter, 2009. "Standard errors for bagged and random forest estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 801-811, January.
    6. Joshua Rosaler & Dhruv Desai & Bhaskarjit Sarmah & Dimitrios Vamvourellis & Deran Onay & Dhagash Mehta & Stefano Pasquali, 2023. "Enhanced Local Explainability and Trust Scores with Random Forest Proximities," Papers 2310.12428, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    7. Michal Friesl & Liam J. A. Lenten & Jan Libich & Petr Stehlík, 2017. "In search of goals: increasing ice hockey’s attractiveness by a sides swap," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(9), pages 1006-1018, September.
    8. David M. Ritzwoller & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2024. "Simultaneous Inference for Local Structural Parameters with Random Forests," Papers 2405.07860, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    9. Mendez, Guillermo & Lohr, Sharon, 2011. "Estimating residual variance in random forest regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2937-2950, November.
    10. Li, Yiliang & Bai, Xiwen & Wang, Qi & Ma, Zhongjun, 2022. "A big data approach to cargo type prediction and its implications for oil trade estimation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    11. Gregory Yampolsky & Dhruv Desai & Mingshu Li & Stefano Pasquali & Dhagash Mehta, 2024. "Case-based Explainability for Random Forest: Prototypes, Critics, Counter-factuals and Semi-factuals," Papers 2408.06679, arXiv.org.
    12. Yi Fu & Shuai Cao & Tao Pang, 2020. "A Sustainable Quantitative Stock Selection Strategy Based on Dynamic Factor Adjustment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Ishwaran, Hemant & Kogalur, Udaya B., 2010. "Consistency of random survival forests," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(13-14), pages 1056-1064, July.
    14. Michael A. Roach & Mark F. Owens, 2024. "Updating Beliefs Based on Observed Performance: Evidence From NFL Head Coaches," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 25(3), pages 369-387, April.
    15. José María Sarabia & Faustino Prieto & Vanesa Jordá & Stefan Sperlich, 2020. "A Note on Combining Machine Learning with Statistical Modeling for Financial Data Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Biau, Gérard & Devroye, Luc, 2010. "On the layered nearest neighbour estimate, the bagged nearest neighbour estimate and the random forest method in regression and classification," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(10), pages 2499-2518, November.
    17. Olivier BIAU & Angela D´ELIA, 2010. "Euro Area GDP Forecast Using Large Survey Dataset - A Random Forest Approach," EcoMod2010 259600029, EcoMod.
    18. Cleridy E. Lennert‐Cody & Richard A. Berk, 2007. "Statistical learning procedures for monitoring regulatory compliance: an application to fisheries data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(3), pages 671-689, July.
    19. Ruoqing Zhu & Donglin Zeng & Michael R. Kosorok, 2015. "Reinforcement Learning Trees," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1770-1784, December.
    20. Susan Athey & Julie Tibshirani & Stefan Wager, 2016. "Generalized Random Forests," Papers 1610.01271, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:2:p:9:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.