IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbcacn/v1y2010i1n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit-Cost Analysis: Distributional Considerations under Producer Quota Buyouts

Author

Listed:
  • Schmitz Andrew

    (University of Florida)

  • Schmitz Troy G.

    (Arizona State University)

Abstract

Benefit-cost (B/C) analysis must take into account the distributional effects from a policy or program change. To highlight this, we focus on the theory of production quota buyouts within a B/C framework. As an empirical application, we provide evidence on the distributional effects of the U.S. government buyout of the peanut program in 2002, where production quotas were key ingredients. Two approaches to producer compensation under the buyout are discussed: (1) value of quota approach and (2) gains from quota approach. In the peanut quota program buyout, the U.S. government chose the value of quota approach. Both consumers and producers were made better off as a result of the buyout, and there was a net gain in efficiency. If the government had chosen the gains from quota approach instead, government expenditures and producer gains would have been lower, and consumer benefits would have remained unchanged. Under either approach, the B/C ratios calculated for the government quota buyout are almost identical.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmitz Andrew & Schmitz Troy G., 2010. "Benefit-Cost Analysis: Distributional Considerations under Producer Quota Buyouts," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:1:y:2010:i:1:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/2152-2812.1002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/2152-2812.1002
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/2152-2812.1002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. D. Wallace, 1962. "Measures of Social Costs of Agricultural Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 44(2), pages 580-594.
    2. Dohlman, Erik & Foreman, Linda F. & Da Pra, Michelle, 2009. "The Post-Buyout Experience: Peanut and Tobacco Sectors Adapt to Policy Reform," Economic Information Bulletin 56628, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. James Vercammen & Andrew Schmitz, 1992. "Supply Management and Import Concessions," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 25(4), pages 957-971, November.
    4. Dohlman, Erik & Foreman, Linda F. & Da Pra, Michelle, 2009. "Removal of Government Controls Opens Peanut and Tobacco Sectors to Market Forces," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-8, December.
    5. Bergtold, Jason S. & Akobundu, Eberechukwu & Peterson, Everett B., 2004. "The FAST Method: Estimating Unconditional Demand Elasticities for Processed Foods in the Presence of Fixed Effects," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Andrew Schmitz & Troy G. Schmitz & Frederick Rossi, 2006. "Agricultural Subsidies in Developed Countries: Impact on Global Welfare," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 416-425.
    7. Paul R. Johnson, 1965. "The Social Cost of the Tobacco Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(2), pages 242-255.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John B. Loomis, 2013. "Incorporating distributional issues into benefit–cost analysis: why, how, and two empirical examples using non-market valuation," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 9, pages 294-316, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Schmitz, Troy G. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2012. "The Complexities of the Interface between Agricultural Policy and Trade," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Haynes, Dwayne J. & Schmitz, Andrew & Schmitz, Troy G., 2015. "Producer Compensation under Government Programs: What Should the Magnitude Be?," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196887, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2020. "Reforming Canada's Dairy Sector: USMCA and the Issue of Compensation," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 542-558, September.
    5. Schmitz Andrew & Haynes Dwayne J. & Schmitz Troy G., 2013. "Benefit-cost analysis: government compensation vs. consumer tax model," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 375-389, December.
    6. Brennan A. McLachlan & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2022. "Reforming Canada's dairy supply management scheme and the consequences for international trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(1), pages 21-39, March.
    7. van Kooten, Gerrit Cornelis, 2017. "The Welfare Economics of Dismantling Dairy Quota in a Confederation of States," Working Papers 256743, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    8. Andrew Schmitz & Dwayne J. Haynes & Troy G. Schmitz, 2016. "Alternative Approaches to Compensation and Producer Rights," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(3), pages 439-454, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dohlman, Erik & Foreman, Linda F. & Da Pra, Michelle, 2010. "Post-Buyout Structural Change in the Peanut and Tobacco Sectors," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56355, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Beck, Anthony C., 1974. "The Social Cost On Production Control In The Australian Egg Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(04), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Brandow, G.E., 1977. "PART III. Policy for Commerical Agriculture, 1945-71," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337215, january.
    4. Schmitz, Troy G. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2012. "The Complexities of the Interface between Agricultural Policy and Trade," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Barnett, Barry J. & Skees, Jerry, 1991. "Ascs Program Yields: Policy Implications For Regional Resource Allocation And Crop Insurance," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271155, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Bullock, David S. & Salhofer, Klaus, 2003. "Judging agricultural policies: a survey," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 225-243, May.
    7. Schmitz Andrew & Haynes Dwayne J. & Schmitz Troy G., 2013. "Benefit-cost analysis: government compensation vs. consumer tax model," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 375-389, December.
    8. Bolotova, Yuliya V., 2018. "An Analysis of Price Behavior in the United States Peanut Industry," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266537, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Chouinard, Hayley H & Davis, David E. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T. & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 2005. "The Effects of a Fat Tax on Dairy Products," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt60t1f3tn, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    10. Christopher Hansman & Harrison Hong & Áureo de Paula & Vishal Singh, 2020. "A Sticky-Price View of Hoarding," NBER Working Papers 27051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Abdou, Dr. Dyaa K., 1982. "Government Distribution and Price Policies for Major Subsidized food Commodities in Egypt: An Overview," Working Papers 232845, University of California, Davis, Agricultural Development Systems: Egypt Project.
    12. Bullock, D. S. & Salhofer, K., 1998. "Measuring the social costs of suboptimal combinations of policy instruments: A general framework and an example," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 249-259, May.
    13. Spitze, R.G.F., 1986. "Determinants of Agricultural and Food Policy Decisions in the U.S," Illinois Agricultural Economics Staff Paper 244656, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics.
    14. Chouinard, Hayley H. & Davis, David E. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T. & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 2005. "Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt82q751hf, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    15. Just, Richard E. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1984. "Uncertain economic environments and conditional policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0q33x98s, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    16. Brennan A. McLachlan & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2022. "Reforming Canada's dairy supply management scheme and the consequences for international trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(1), pages 21-39, March.
    17. Piggott, Roley R., . "Agricultural Selling Cartels: Relative Co-Operator And Non-Cooperator Gains," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 25(1), pages 1-16.
    18. Fulgence Dominick Waryoba, 2018. "Import Base and Revenue Improvement Possibilities in Tanzania," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(1), pages 21-28, March.
    19. Ferrier, Peyton & Peterson, Everett E. & Landes, Maurice, 2012. "Specialty Crop Access to U.S. Markets: A Case Study of Indian Mangoes," Economic Research Report 262228, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Alston, Julian M. & Chalfant, James A. & Pardey, Philip G., 1993. "Structural Adjustment In Oecd Agriculture: Government Policies And Technical Change," Working Papers 14473, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbcacn:v:1:y:2010:i:1:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.