IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v4y2008i1n15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Missing-At-Random (SMAR) Design and Analysis for Translational Research Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Belitskaya-Levy Ilana

    (New York University School of Medicine)

  • Shao Yongzhao

    (Iowa State University)

  • Goldberg Judith D

    (New York University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Translational research studies often involve a central study (e.g. clinical trial, cohort of patients, etc.) and multiple investigators who are each interested in addressing different research questions using the same patient population. However, it is often impossible for the investigators to include all patients in all of the ancillary translational research substudies that are part of the main study. This arises due to time and budgetary constraints and other logistical considerations. In this paper, we propose a prospective Systematic Missing-At-Random study design (SMAR) with planned partially missing covariates collected using a nested random sampling scheme that allows an integrated statistical analysis across all domains of data. We propose an algorithm for data analysis that incorporates the features of the design. We show that the SMAR design is computationally and statistically efficient as well as cost effective using simulation studies and a published data example. An extension to a two-stage prospective-retrospective design is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Belitskaya-Levy Ilana & Shao Yongzhao & Goldberg Judith D, 2008. "Systematic Missing-At-Random (SMAR) Design and Analysis for Translational Research Studies," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-28, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:4:y:2008:i:1:n:15
    DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1046
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1557-4679.1046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hua Yun Chen, 2003. "A note on the prospective analysis of outcome‐dependent samples," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(2), pages 575-584, May.
    2. Chatterjee N. & Chen Y-H. & Breslow N.E., 2003. "A Pseudoscore Estimator for Regression Problems With Two-Phase Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 158-168, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Vahl & Qing Kang, 2015. "Analysis of an outcome-dependent enriched sample: hypothesis tests," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(3), pages 387-409, September.
    2. Lawrence C. McCandless & Sylvia Richardson & Nicky Best, 2012. "Adjustment for Missing Confounders Using External Validation Data and Propensity Scores," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 40-51, March.
    3. Qingning Zhou & Jianwen Cai & Haibo Zhou, 2018. "Outcome†dependent sampling with interval†censored failure time data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 58-67, March.
    4. X. Hu & Bin Zhang, 2012. "Pseudolikelihood ratio test with biased observations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 387-400, May.
    5. Cao, Yongxiu & Yu, Jichang, 2023. "Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in survival causal effect using validation data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Zhiwei Zhang & Howard Rockette, 2006. "Semiparametric Maximum Likelihood for Missing Covariates in Parametric Regression," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 58(4), pages 687-706, December.
    7. J. F. Lawless, 2018. "Two-phase outcome-dependent studies for failure times and testing for effects of expensive covariates," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 28-44, January.
    8. Brady Ryan & Ananthika Nirmalkanna & Candemir Cigsar & Yildiz E. Yilmaz, 2023. "Evaluation of Designs and Estimation Methods Under Response-Dependent Two-Phase Sampling for Genetic Association Studies," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 510-539, July.
    9. Haibo Zhou & Rui Song & Yuanshan Wu & Jing Qin, 2011. "Statistical Inference for a Two-Stage Outcome-Dependent Sampling Design with a Continuous Outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 194-202, March.
    10. Samiran Sinha & Krishna K. Saha & Suojin Wang, 2014. "Semiparametric approach for non-monotone missing covariates in a parametric regression model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 299-311, June.
    11. Yang Zhao & Meng Liu, 2021. "Unified approach for regression models with nonmonotone missing at random data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 87-101, March.
    12. Fatema Shafie Khorassani & Jeremy M. G. Taylor & Niko Kaciroti & Michael R. Elliott, 2023. "Incorporating Covariates into Measures of Surrogate Paradox Risk," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Hua Yun Chen, 2007. "A Semiparametric Odds Ratio Model for Measuring Association," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 413-421, June.
    14. Haibo Zhou & Guoyou Qin & Matthew P. Longnecker, 2011. "A Partial Linear Model in the Outcome-Dependent Sampling Setting to Evaluate the Effect of Prenatal PCB Exposure on Cognitive Function in Children," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 876-885, September.
    15. Jieli Ding & Tsui-Shan Lu & Jianwen Cai & Haibo Zhou, 2017. "Recent progresses in outcome-dependent sampling with failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 57-82, January.
    16. Hua Yun Chen & Daniel E. Rader & Mingyao Li, 2015. "Likelihood Inferences on Semiparametric Odds Ratio Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1125-1135, September.
    17. Ying Huang & Peter B. Gilbert & Julian Wolfson, 2013. "Design and Estimation for Evaluating Principal Surrogate Markers in Vaccine Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 301-309, June.
    18. Grünewald Maria & Humphreys Keith & Hössjer Ola, 2010. "A Stochastic EM Type Algorithm for Parameter Estimation in Models with Continuous Outcomes, under Complex Ascertainment," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-31, July.
    19. Hua Yun Chen & Hui Xie & Yi Qian, 2011. "Multiple Imputation for Missing Values through Conditional Semiparametric Odds Ratio Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 799-809, September.
    20. Qingning Zhou & Jianwen Cai & Haibo Zhou, 2020. "Semiparametric inference for a two-stage outcome-dependent sampling design with interval-censored failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 85-108, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:4:y:2008:i:1:n:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.