IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v67y2011i1p309-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multiphase Design Strategy for Dealing with Participation Bias

Author

Listed:
  • S. Haneuse
  • J. Chen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Haneuse & J. Chen, 2011. "A Multiphase Design Strategy for Dealing with Participation Bias," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 309-318, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:67:y:2011:i:1:p:309-318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01419.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chatterjee, Nilanjan, 2004. "A Two-Stage Regression Model for Epidemiological Studies With Multivariate Disease Classification Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 127-138, January.
    2. N. E. Breslow & N. Chatterjee, 1999. "Design and analysis of two‐phase studies with binary outcome applied to Wilms tumour prognosis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 48(4), pages 457-468.
    3. J. F. Lawless & J. D. Kalbfleisch & C. J. Wild, 1999. "Semiparametric methods for response‐selective and missing data problems in regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(2), pages 413-438, April.
    4. Chatterjee N. & Chen Y-H. & Breslow N.E., 2003. "A Pseudoscore Estimator for Regression Problems With Two-Phase Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 158-168, January.
    5. Dean Follmann & Michael Proschan & Eric Leifer, 2003. "Multiple Outputation: Inference for Complex Clustered Data by Averaging Analyses from Independent Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 420-429, June.
    6. Chen, Jinbo & Ayyagari, Rajeev & Chatterjee, Nilanjan & Pee, David Y & Schairer, Catherine & Byrne, Celia & Benichou, Jacques & Gail, Mitchell H, 2008. "Breast Cancer Relative Hazard Estimates From Case–Control and Cohort Designs With Missing Data on Mammographic Density," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 976-988.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brady Ryan & Ananthika Nirmalkanna & Candemir Cigsar & Yildiz E. Yilmaz, 2023. "Evaluation of Designs and Estimation Methods Under Response-Dependent Two-Phase Sampling for Genetic Association Studies," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 510-539, July.
    2. Zhiwei Zhang & Howard Rockette, 2006. "Semiparametric Maximum Likelihood for Missing Covariates in Parametric Regression," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 58(4), pages 687-706, December.
    3. J. F. Lawless, 2018. "Two-phase outcome-dependent studies for failure times and testing for effects of expensive covariates," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 28-44, January.
    4. Haibo Zhou & Rui Song & Yuanshan Wu & Jing Qin, 2011. "Statistical Inference for a Two-Stage Outcome-Dependent Sampling Design with a Continuous Outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 194-202, March.
    5. Mukherjee, Bhramar & Liu, Ivy, 2009. "A note on bias due to fitting prospective multivariate generalized linear models to categorical outcomes ignoring retrospective sampling schemes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 459-472, March.
    6. Xiaofei Wang & Haibo Zhou, 2006. "A Semiparametric Empirical Likelihood Method for Biased Sampling Schemes with Auxiliary Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1149-1160, December.
    7. Yang Zhao & Meng Liu, 2021. "Unified approach for regression models with nonmonotone missing at random data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 87-101, March.
    8. Fatema Shafie Khorassani & Jeremy M. G. Taylor & Niko Kaciroti & Michael R. Elliott, 2023. "Incorporating Covariates into Measures of Surrogate Paradox Risk," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Constantine E. Frangakis & Stuart G. Baker, 2001. "Compliance Subsampling Designs for Comparative Research: Estimation and Optimal Planning," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 899-908, September.
    10. Sebastien J.‐P. A. Haneuse & And Jonathan C. Wakefield, 2008. "The combination of ecological and case–control data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 73-93, February.
    11. Jieli Ding & Tsui-Shan Lu & Jianwen Cai & Haibo Zhou, 2017. "Recent progresses in outcome-dependent sampling with failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 57-82, January.
    12. Yuichi Hirose, 2011. "Efficiency of profile likelihood in semi-parametric models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(6), pages 1247-1275, December.
    13. Wenguang Sun & Marshall M. Joffe & Jinbo Chen & Steven M. Brunelli, 2010. "Design and Analysis of Multiple Events Case–Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1220-1229, December.
    14. James Y. Dai & Michael LeBlanc & Charles Kooperberg, 2009. "Semiparametric Estimation Exploiting Covariate Independence in Two-Phase Randomized Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 178-187, March.
    15. Weiwei Wang & Daniel Scharfstein & Zhiqiang Tan & Ellen J. MacKenzie, 2009. "Causal inference in outcome‐dependent two‐phase sampling designs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 947-969, November.
    16. Michelle Ross & Jon Wakefield, 2013. "Bayesian Inference for Two-Phase Studies with Categorical Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 469-477, June.
    17. Yang Zhao, 2021. "Semiparametric model for regression analysis with nonmonotone missing data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(2), pages 461-475, June.
    18. Lu Chen & Li Hsu & Kathleen Malone, 2009. "A Frailty-Model-Based Approach to Estimating the Age-Dependent Penetrance Function of Candidate Genes Using Population-Based Case-Control Study Designs: An Application to Data on the BRCA1 Gene," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1105-1114, December.
    19. Lawrence C. McCandless & Sylvia Richardson & Nicky Best, 2012. "Adjustment for Missing Confounders Using External Validation Data and Propensity Scores," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 40-51, March.
    20. Qingning Zhou & Jianwen Cai & Haibo Zhou, 2018. "Outcome†dependent sampling with interval†censored failure time data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 58-67, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:67:y:2011:i:1:p:309-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.