IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/arbeit/v30y2021i1p3-20n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisationale Technokulturen: Kritik und Humor in der „Industrie 4.0“

Author

Listed:
  • Schaupp Simon

    (Universität Basel, Petersgraben 27, 4051Basel, Schweiz)

Abstract

The article examines organizational-cultural practices of technology critique in the context of “Industry 4.0”. The empirical basis is an ethnographic study of the appropriation of algorithmic work control by production workers in two industrial enterprises. In order to analyze the shared cultural references of workers to digital technologies, the article proposes the concept of organizational technocultures. These can be divided into official organizational technocultures and technocultures of critique. While the former propagate the use of technology in accordance with the goals of the organization, the latter distance themselves from these goals and instead focus on the self-will of the actors. The extent to which these technocultures manifest themselves is strongly context-dependent. In situations in which the management of the companies investigated was not present, workers’ criticism manifested itself in explicit and vehement accusations of digital violations of their dignity. However, critical appropriation practices also occurred in everyday working life when management is present. Then, they primarily took the form of subversive humor. Contrary to a position that understands workers as passive objects or ‘accomplices’ of digital control regimes, it can be shown here that workers develop specific interpretative skills in order to identify spaces of autonomy and to exercise critique.

Suggested Citation

  • Schaupp Simon, 2021. "Organisationale Technokulturen: Kritik und Humor in der „Industrie 4.0“," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 30(1), pages 3-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:3-20:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/arbeit-2021-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2021-0002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/arbeit-2021-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alston,Eric & Alston,Lee J. & Mueller,Bernardo & Nonnenmacher,Tomas, 2018. "Institutional and Organizational Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107451254, September.
    2. Schaupp, Simon, 2020. "Taylorismus oder Kybernetik ?," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 73(3), pages 201-208.
    3. Kratzer, Nick, 2020. "Arbeitsintensität und Arbeitsintensivierung," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 73(1), pages 3-10.
    4. Krishnan Hariharan & Vivekanand G, 2018. "Perspectives on Organizational Learning," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(1), pages 81-86, January.
    5. Gerardine DeSanctis & Marshall Scott Poole, 1994. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 121-147, May.
    6. Oecd, 2018. "Intergovernmental organisation activities," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2017(1), pages 95-104.
    7. Hussain Bakhsh Magsi & Tze San Ong & Jo Ann Ho & Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh Hassan, 2018. "Organizational Culture and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. John M. Jermier & John W. Slocum & Louis W. Fry & Jeannie Gaines, 1991. "Organizational Subcultures in a Soft Bureaucracy: Resistance Behind the Myth and Facade of an Official Culture," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 170-194, May.
    9. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2000. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 404-428, August.
    10. ., 2018. "The emergence of complex political organisation," Chapters, in: A History of the Global Economy, chapter 9, pages 154-171, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Oecd, 2018. "Intergovernmental organisation activities," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2018(1), pages 107-118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nareerut Seerasarn & Servel A. Miller & Apinya Wanaset, 2020. "Transitioning to Organic Rice Farming in Thailand: Drivers and Factors," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 740-748, October.
    2. Seerasarn, Nareerut & Miller, Servel A. & Wanaset, Apinya, 2020. "Transitioning to Organic Rice Farming in Thailand: Drivers and Factors," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 10(03), January.
    3. Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert & Andrew B. Whinston, 2001. "Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 225-239, September.
    4. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    5. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    6. Carlos A. Osorio & Dov Dori & Joseph Sussman, 2011. "COIM: An object‐process based method for analyzing architectures of complex, interconnected, large‐scale socio‐technical systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 364-382, December.
    7. Hung-pin Shih & Kee-hung Lai & T. C. E. Cheng, 2015. "Examining structural, perceptual, and attitudinal influences on the quality of information sharing in collaborative technology use," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 455-470, April.
    8. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    9. Pingsheng Tong & U. N. Umesh & Jean L. Johnson & Ruby P. Lee, 2016. "Collaborative Relationships — The Role of Information Technology," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 1-30, June.
    10. Daniel Beverungen, 2014. "Exploring the Interplay of the Design and Emergence of Business Processes as Organizational Routines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(4), pages 191-202, August.
    11. Michiel Bal & Jos Benders & Lander Vermeerbergen, 2022. "‘Bringing the Covert into the Open’: A Case Study on Technology Appropriation and Continuous Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Jonatan Pinkse & René Bohnsack, 2021. "Sustainable product innovation and changing consumer behavior: Sustainability affordances as triggers of adoption and usage," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3120-3130, November.
    13. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2020. "Why distance matters: The relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Khuong, Le-Nguyen & Harindranath, G. & Dyerson, Romano, 2014. "Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: A case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 226-247.
    15. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2018. "Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 330-339.
    16. Marie-Claude Boudreau & Daniel Robey, 2005. "Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-18, February.
    17. Verstegen, Luuk & Houkes, Wybo & Reymen, Isabelle, 2019. "Configuring collective digital-technology usage in dynamic and complex design practices," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    18. Fang Liu & Dongming Xu, 2018. "Social Roles and Consequences in Using Social Media in Disasters: a Structurational Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 693-711, August.
    19. Boyer O’Leary, Michael & Wilson, Jeanne M. & Metiu, Anca, 2011. "Beyond Being There: The Symbolic Role of Communication and Identification in the Emergence of Perceived Proximity in Geographically Dispersed Work," ESSEC Working Papers WP1112, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    20. Giang-Do Nguyen & Thu-Hien Thi Dao, 2024. "Factors influencing continuance intention to use mobile banking: an extended expectation-confirmation model with moderating role of trust," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:arbeit:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:3-20:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.