IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/wsimit/10.5771-0342-300x-2020-3-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taylorismus oder Kybernetik ?

Author

Listed:
  • Schaupp, Simon

Abstract

The concept of “digital Taylorism” has become the blueprint for interpreting algorithmic labour control. This article examines which elements of Taylorism actually are adopted in algorithmic labour control and positions cybernetics as an alternative point of reference for historical interpretation. The author concludes that the concept of digital Taylorism adequately underscores the aspects of segmentation and simplification of the labour process and, in part, of information asymmetry. However, the concept cannot capture the central aspects of feedback, self-organisation and automation of middle management, as well as the instability of digitalised employment relationships, since these are essentially based on the cybernetic theory of control. Cybernetics is currently undergoing a revitalisation in the field of digital labour control, since, for the first time, the development of digital sensor technology makes the central cybernetic idea of permanent feedback technically feasible.

Suggested Citation

  • Schaupp, Simon, 2020. "Taylorismus oder Kybernetik ?," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 73(3), pages 201-208.
  • Handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2020-3-201
    DOI: 10.5771/0342-300X-2020-3-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0342-300X-2020-3-201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0342-300X-2020-3-201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schaupp Simon, 2021. "Organisationale Technokulturen: Kritik und Humor in der „Industrie 4.0“," Arbeit, De Gruyter, vol. 30(1), pages 3-20, March.
    2. Rego, Kerstin & Houben, Daniel & Brüning, Steffen & Schaupp, Simon & Meyer, Uli, 2021. "Mitbestimmungspraxis in der "Industrie 4.0": Möglichkeiten der Einflussnahme und Gestaltung für Betriebsräte," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 232, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:wsimit:10.5771/0342-300x-2020-3-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.