IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v78y2024i1p105-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On partially observed competing risks model for Chen distribution under generalized progressive hybrid censoring

Author

Listed:
  • Kundan Singh
  • Amulya Kumar Mahto
  • Yogesh Mani Tripathi

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the inference for the competing risks model when the failure times follow Chen distribution. With assumption of two causes of failures, which are partially observed, are considered as independent. The existence and uniqueness of maximum likelihood estimates for model parameters are obtained under generalized progressive hybrid censoring. Also, we discussed the classical and Bayesian inferences of the model parameters under the assumption of restricted and nonrestricted parameters. Performance of classical point and interval estimators are compared with Bayesian point and interval estimators by conducting extensive simulation study. In addition to that, for illustration purpose, a real life example is discussed. Finally, some concluding remarks, regarding the presented model, are made.

Suggested Citation

  • Kundan Singh & Amulya Kumar Mahto & Yogesh Mani Tripathi, 2024. "On partially observed competing risks model for Chen distribution under generalized progressive hybrid censoring," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 78(1), pages 105-135, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:78:y:2024:i:1:p:105-135
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:78:y:2024:i:1:p:105-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.