IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v41y2024i3p439-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational ambidexterity and knowledge management: A systems perspective towards Smart Model‐based Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Armenia
  • Sergio Barile
  • Francesca Iandolo
  • Alessandro Pompei
  • Luigi Maria Sicca

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose a new framework for the governance of ‘modern’ smart organisations that integrates IT‐based orientation to decision‐making, systems thinking through system dynamics modelling and cybernetics. The design of the proposed framework is based on the key role played by knowledge in the governance of organisations. The literature on ambidexterity, organisational learning, knowledge management and systems thinking is the adopted research background. A synthesis of the connection points between these fields is proposed within a theoretical framework named Smart Model‐based Organisations. The main result of this work is represented by the proposed Smart Model‐based Governance (SMbG) framework and an example of application. There are two main findings related to the contribution of the proposed framework: the overcoming of ‘data‐based’ approaches that favour rigidity in knowledge governance and the contribution of systems approaches that, increasing organisational involvement, improve knowledge governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Armenia & Sergio Barile & Francesca Iandolo & Alessandro Pompei & Luigi Maria Sicca, 2024. "Organisational ambidexterity and knowledge management: A systems perspective towards Smart Model‐based Governance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 439-452, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:3:p:439-452
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2985
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:3:p:439-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.