IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v34y2017i3p313-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Search for Viability: A practitioner's view of how the Viable Systems Model is helping transform English local government (and why it has passed unrecognised)

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Walker

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Walker, 2017. "The Search for Viability: A practitioner's view of how the Viable Systems Model is helping transform English local government (and why it has passed unrecognised)," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 313-334, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:34:y:2017:i:3:p:313-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sres.2455
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoe Radnor & Stephen P. Osborne, 2013. "Lean: A failed theory for public services?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 265-287, February.
    2. John Seddon & Carlton Brand, 2008. "Debate: Systems Thinking and Public Sector Performance," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 7-9, February.
    3. Barile, Sergio & Saviano, Marialuisa & Polese, Francesco & Di Nauta, Primiano, 2012. "Reflections on service systems boundaries: A viable systems perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 451-465.
    4. A J Gregory, 2007. "Target setting, lean systems and viable systems: a systems perspective on control and performance measurement," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(11), pages 1503-1517, November.
    5. Ulrich, Werner, 1987. "Critical heuristics of social systems design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 276-283, September.
    6. M C Jackson & N Johnston & J Seddon, 2008. "Evaluating systems thinking in housing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 186-197, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesca Iandolo & Pietro Vito & Francesca Loia & Irene Fulco & Mario Calabrese, 2021. "Drilling down the viable system theories in business, management and accounting: A bibliometric review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 738-755, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayham A. M. Jaaron & Chris J. Backhouse, 2017. "Operationalising “Double-Loop” Learning in Service Organisations: A Systems Approach for Creating Knowledge," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 317-337, August.
    2. M C Jackson, 2009. "Fifty years of systems thinking for management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 24-32, May.
    3. Gerald Midgley & Erik Lindhult, 2021. "A systems perspective on systemic innovation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 635-670, October.
    4. Pankaj Kumar Baag & Kavitha P. & Ashutosh Sarkar, 2019. "Application of Lean Tool for Process Improvement of Bank Branches," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 131-142, July.
    5. Duong Thuy Pham & Ayham A. M. Jaaron, 2018. "Design for Mass Customisation in Higher Education: a Systems-Thinking Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 293-310, June.
    6. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Zajda, Catherine & Pasikowski, Slawomir, 2018. "The scale of intersectoral cooperation for the implementation of social policy in rural areas. Proposed research tool," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 181(4), December.
    8. Hart, Diane & Paucar-Caceres, Alberto, 2017. "A utilisation focussed and viable systems approach for evaluating technology supported learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 626-641.
    9. Ray Ison & Andrea Grant & Richard Bawden, 2014. "Scenario Praxis for Systemic Governance: A Critical Framework," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 623-640, August.
    10. I Georgiou, 2003. "The idea of emergent property," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(3), pages 239-247, March.
    11. Francesco Polese & Luca Carrubbo & Francesco Caputo & Debora Sarno, 2018. "Managing Healthcare Service Ecosystems: Abstracting a Sustainability-Based View from Hospitalization at Home (HaH) Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2023. "Methodological Flexibility in Systems Thinking: Musings from the Standpoint of a Systems Consultant," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 59-86, February.
    13. Ormerod, R.J., 2014. "Critical rationalism in practice: Strategies to manage subjectivity in OR investigations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 784-797.
    14. Valentina Dinica, 2014. "Competing societal and ecological demands for groundwater: boundary judgments and convergence mechanisms in the Netherlands," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 555-573, June.
    15. Syed Arshad Raza & Atiq W. Siddiqui & Craig Standing, 2019. "Exploring Systemic Problems in IS Adoption Using Critical Systems Heuristics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 125-153, April.
    16. Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Ries, J. M., 2016. "Decision support models for supplier development: systematic literature review and research agenda," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77945, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. W Ulrich, 2004. "Reply to the comments of Ormerod: the history of ideas of CST," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(11), pages 1238-1241, November.
    18. Anselm Schneider, 2015. "Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 525-536, March.
    19. Michaela Kotkova Striteska & David Zapletal, 2020. "The Role of Corporate Culture in Performance Measurement and Management Systems," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:34:y:2017:i:3:p:313-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.