IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v31y2018i3d10.1007_s11213-017-9426-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design for Mass Customisation in Higher Education: a Systems-Thinking Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Duong Thuy Pham

    (Fengchia University
    Thainguyen University of Economics & Business Administration)

  • Ayham A. M. Jaaron

    (An-Najah National University)

Abstract

The point of this research is to investigate the impact of systems-thinking principles (Seddon 2003) on operationalising the ‘mass customisation’ capability of student services in higher education institutions. The research empirically contributes to student-service mass customisation in higher education through the findings of a case study conducted at the admission and academic registry service department of one of the UK’s leading universities. A qualitative methodology was employed with the use of semi-structured interviews, focus group, observations, and documentation supplements. It was found that the principles of systems-thinking are positively related to enhancement of mass customisation capability through the realisation of three different levels of service mass customisation determinants. These three levels are: employee level (i.e. micro determinants); operational level (i.e. meso determinants); and functional level (i.e. macro determinants). A conceptual model was developed to explain the relationships among these three organisational levels, supported by empirical evidences. The value of this paper is the introduction of a conceptual model that could operationalise ‘mass customisation’ in universities by integrating human resources, operational and functional dimensions in a systematic design to deliver customised services for students as individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Duong Thuy Pham & Ayham A. M. Jaaron, 2018. "Design for Mass Customisation in Higher Education: a Systems-Thinking Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 293-310, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:31:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11213-017-9426-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-017-9426-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-017-9426-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-017-9426-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M C Jackson & N Johnston & J Seddon, 2008. "Evaluating systems thinking in housing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 186-197, February.
    2. John Seddon & Carlton Brand, 2008. "Debate: Systems Thinking and Public Sector Performance," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 7-9, February.
    3. Minvielle, Etienne & Waelli, Mathias & Sicotte, Claude & Kimberly, John R., 2014. "Managing customization in health care: A framework derived from the services sector literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 216-227.
    4. Da Silveira, Giovani & Borenstein, Denis & Fogliatto, Flavio S., 2001. "Mass customization: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Michael Sony & Nandakumar Mekoth, 2012. "A typology for frontline employee adaptability to gain insights in service customisation: a viewpoint," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 490-508.
    6. Etienne Minvielle & Mathias Waelli & Claude Sicotte & John R. Kimberly, 2014. "Managing customization in health care: A framework derived from the services sector literature," Post-Print hal-01509885, HAL.
    7. M C Jackson, 2009. "Fifty years of systems thinking for management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 24-32, May.
    8. Michael Gibbert & Winfried Ruigrok & Barbara Wicki, 2008. "What passes as a rigorous case study?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1465-1474, December.
    9. Ayham A. M. Jaaron & Chris J. Backhouse, 2011. "Value-Adding to Public Services Through the Adoption of Lean Thinking," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 2(3), pages 33-50, July.
    10. Seung Moon & Jun Shu & Timothy Simpson & Soundar Kumara, 2011. "A module-based service model for mass customization: service family design," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 153-163.
    11. John Seddon & Simon Caulkin, 2007. "Systems thinking, lean production and action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 9-24, April.
    12. Keivan Zokaei, 2011. "How Systems Thinking Provides a Framework for Change: A Case Study of Disabled Facilities Grant Service in Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Keivan Zokaei & John Seddon & Brendan O’Donovan (ed.), Systems Thinking: From Heresy to Practice, chapter 2, pages 17-39, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ya Li & Zhichang Zhu & Catherine M. Gerard, 2012. "Learning from Conflict Resolution: An Opportunity to Systems Thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 209-220, March.
    2. Michael Walker, 2017. "The Search for Viability: A practitioner's view of how the Viable Systems Model is helping transform English local government (and why it has passed unrecognised)," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 313-334, May.
    3. Ding, Huiping & Chen, Xiangbo & Lin, Kuanhai & Wei, Yunbing, 2019. "Collaborative mechanism of project profit allotment in petroleum engineering service chain with customized integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 163-174.
    4. Gersch, Martin & Gertz, Cordelia & Vogt, Charlotte, 2017. "Leistungsangebote in integrierten, IT-unterstützten Versorgungskonzepten: Eine Konzeption (re-) konfigurierbarer Servicemodule im Gesundheitswesen. Projekt Bea@Home," Discussion Papers 2017/14, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    5. Kasiri, Leila Agha & Guan Cheng, Kenny Teoh & Sambasivan, Murali & Sidin, Samsinar Md., 2017. "Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 91-97.
    6. Ayham A. M. Jaaron & Chris J. Backhouse, 2017. "Operationalising “Double-Loop” Learning in Service Organisations: A Systems Approach for Creating Knowledge," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 317-337, August.
    7. M C Jackson, 2009. "Fifty years of systems thinking for management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 24-32, May.
    8. Adam Diamant, 2021. "Dynamic multistage scheduling for patient-centered care plans," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 827-844, December.
    9. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.
    10. Rönnberg Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5330-5335.
    11. Preece, Gary & Shaw, Duncan & Hayashi, Haruo, 2013. "Using the Viable System Model (VSM) to structure information processing complexity in disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 209-218.
    12. Zhou, Wei & Piramuthu, Selwyn, 2012. "Manufacturing with item-level RFID information: From macro to micro quality control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 929-938.
    13. Gaston Fornes & Abel Monfort & Camelia Ilie & Chun Kwong (Tony) Koo & Guillermo Cardoza, 2019. "Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability in MBAs. Understanding the Motivations for the Incorporation of ERS in Less Traditional Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Natalia Szozda & Artur Świerczek, 2022. "Upstream and downstream dyad governance within the network structures: Creating supply chain governance for the customized products," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 873-898, June.
    15. Richard J. Ormerod, 2016. "Critical Rationalism for Practice and its Relationship to Critical Systems Thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 4-23, January.
    16. Cheng Mei Tung, 2018. "Vertical integration for smart manufacturing-The dynamic capability perspective," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 4(2), pages 70-78.
    17. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    18. Anja Schulze & Stefano Brusoni, 2022. "How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem‐solving," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2447-2477, December.
    19. Lea Stadtler & Luk N. Wassenhove, 2023. "Between Intensity and Diversity: Leveraging the Role of Place in Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 773-791, May.
    20. Giovanna Centorrino & Guido Noto & Daniela Rupo, 2022. "Management control in inter-firm relationships: Opportunities and challenges of blockchain technology adoption," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 65-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:31:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11213-017-9426-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.