IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v40y2023i3p341-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs

Author

Listed:
  • Sojeong Kim
  • Adam M. Wellstead
  • Tanya Heikkila

Abstract

In scarcely a decade, a “labification” phenomenon has taken hold globally. The search for innovative policy solutions for social problems is embedded within scientific experimental‐like structures often referred to as policy innovation labs (PILs). With the rapid technological changes (e.g., big data, artificial intelligence), data‐based PILs have emerged. Despite the growing importance of these PILs in the policy process, very little is known about them and how they contribute to policy outcomes. This study analyzes 133 data‐based PILs and examines their contribution to policy capacity. We adopt policy capacity framework to investigate how data‐based PILs contribute to enhancing analytical, organization, and political policy capacity. Many data‐based PILs are located in Western Europe and North America, initiated by governments, and employ multi‐domain administrative data with advanced technologies. Our analysis finds that data‐based PILs enhance analytical and operational policy capacity at the individual, organizational and systemic levels but do little to enhance political capacity. It is this deficit that we suggest possible strategies for data‐based PILs. 在不到十年的时间里,一种“实验室化”(labification)现象在全球蔓延开来。对社会问题的创新政策解决方案的探索,嵌入在类似科学实验的结构中,这种结构通常被称为政策创新实验室(PILs)。随着技术的快速变革(例如大数据、人工智能),基于数据的PILs应运而生。尽管这些PILs在政策过程中的重要性日益增加,但人们对PILs以及其如何为政策结果作贡献一事知之甚少。本研究分析了133个基于数据的PILs,并分析了它们对政策能力的贡献。我们采用Wu等人在2015年提出的政策能力框架,以研究基于数据的PILs如何有助于提高分析能力、组织能力和政治政策能力。许多基于数据的 PILs位于西欧和北美,由政府发起,通过先进技术应用多域管理数据。我们的分析发现,基于数据的PILs增强了个人层面、组织层面和系统层面的分析政策能力和操作政策能力,但对增强政治能力而言几乎没有任何作用。为填补该缺陷,我们为基于数据的PILs提出了可能的策略。. En apenas una década, un fenómeno de “labificación” se ha afianzado a nivel mundial. La búsqueda de soluciones políticas innovadoras para los problemas sociales está integrada dentro de estructuras experimentales científicas a menudo denominadas laboratorios de innovación de políticas (PIL, por sus siglas en inglés). Con los rápidos cambios tecnológicos (por ejemplo, big data, inteligencia artificial), han surgido PIL basados en datos. A pesar de la creciente importancia de estos PIL en el proceso de políticas, se sabe muy poco sobre ellos y cómo contribuyen a los resultados de las políticas. Este estudio analiza 133 PIL basados en datos y examina su contribución a la capacidad política. Adoptamos el marco de capacidad de políticas de 2015 de Wu et al. para investigar cómo los PIL basados en datos contribuyen a mejorar la capacidad de políticas analíticas, organizativas y políticas. Muchos PIL basados en datos están ubicados en Europa Occidental y América del Norte, iniciados por gobiernos, y emplean datos administrativos de múltiples dominios con tecnologías avanzadas. Nuestro análisis encuentra que los PIL basados en datos mejoran la capacidad política analítica y operativa a nivel individual, organizacional y sistémico, pero hacen poco para mejorar la capacidad política. Es este déficit el que sugerimos posibles estrategias para los PIL basados en datos.

Suggested Citation

  • Sojeong Kim & Adam M. Wellstead & Tanya Heikkila, 2023. "Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 341-362, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:40:y:2023:i:3:p:341-362
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12494
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Pamela Villa Alvarez & Valentina Auricchio & Marzia Mortati, 2022. "Mapping design activities and methods of public sector innovation units through the policy cycle model," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 89-136, March.
    2. Piret Tõnurist & Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2017. "Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1455-1479, November.
    3. Anat Gofen, 2015. "Reconciling policy dissonance: patterns of governmental response to policy noncompliance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(1), pages 3-24, March.
    4. Jan Janosch Förster & Linda Downsborough & Lisa Biber-Freudenberger & Girma Kelboro Mensuro & Jan Börner, 2021. "Exploring criteria for transformative policy capacity in the context of South Africa’s biodiversity economy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 209-237, March.
    5. Catherine Althaus & Lisa Carson & Ken Smith, 2021. "Rethinking the commissioning of consultants for enhancing government policy capacity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 867-889, December.
    6. Ulf Hjelmar, 2021. "The institutionalization of public sector innovation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 53-69, January.
    7. Michael McGann & Emma Blomkamp & Jenny M. Lewis, 2018. "The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 249-267, September.
    8. Sally N. Cummings & Ole Nørgaard, 2004. "Conceptualising State Capacity: Comparing Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(4), pages 685-708, December.
    9. Joshua Newman & Adrian Cherney & Brian W. Head, 2017. "Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 157-174, February.
    10. Sally N. Cummings & Ole Nørgaard, 2004. "Conceptualising State Capacity: Comparing Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52, pages 685-708, December.
    11. Rianne Dekker & Juan Franco Contreras & Albert Meijer, 2020. "The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: a Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(14), pages 1207-1217, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco, 2023. "Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Fuglsang, Lars & Hansen, Anne Vorre, 2022. "Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    3. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Natalia Restrepo, 2019. "The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance—The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Alessandro Pollini & Alessandro Caforio, 2021. "Participation and Iterative Experiments: Designing Alternative Futures with Migrants and Service Providers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Diana Pamela Villa Alvarez & Valentina Auricchio & Marzia Mortati, 2022. "Mapping design activities and methods of public sector innovation units through the policy cycle model," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 89-136, March.
    6. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Nathalie Haug & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Public Value Co-Creation in Living Labs—Results from Three Case Studies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Dan DUNGACIU & Lucian DUMITRESCU, 2022. "A Prognosis on Romania’s Capacity to Deal with Emergency Situations: Objective and Subjective Resilience during The Covid-19 Pandemic," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 176-190, April.
    9. Linda Calabrese, 2024. "Diversifying Away from Extractives: The Belt and Road Initiative, Chinese Capital and Industrialisation in the Kyrgyz Republic," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(3), pages 601-638, June.
    10. Mahony, Greg & Sadleir, Chris, 2011. "Metagovernance and the Role of Cultural Norms in the Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment: Trans-Tasman FDI Regimes," Working Paper Series 19188, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    11. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19188 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Haruthai Chenboonthai & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2018. "Organizational and Systemic Policy Capacity of Government Organizations Involved in Energy-From-Waste (EFW) Development in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Urmanaviciene Audrone & Kostalova Jana & Baturina Danijel & Krzyworzeka Paweł & Budrytė Paulina & Lepik Katri-Liis, 2022. "Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(s1), pages 381-401, October.
    14. Kim, Jiin & Huh, Jin & Yoo, Sung-Sang, 2023. "Implementation of reproductive health education in a Filipino city: A case study," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. David Jancsics & Salvador Espinosa & Jonathan Carlos, 2023. "Organizational noncompliance: an interdisciplinary review of social and organizational factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1273-1301, September.
    16. Helen Ngozi ELEMS-IKWEGBU, Ph.D, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Educational Policy Formulation and Implementation Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(7), pages 922-941, July.
    17. Kawther Saeedi & Anna Visvizi & Dimah Alahmadi & Amal Babour, 2023. "Smart Cities and Households’ Recyclable Waste Management: The Case of Jeddah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Ryan Anders Whitney & David López-García, 2023. "Fast-track institutionalization: The opening of urban planning best practice agencies in Mexico City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 600-616, May.
    19. Vasco Fonseca & Joaquim Caeiro & Fernanda Nogueira, 2021. "Social Model—Innovation and Behavioural Intervention as a Public Policy of Action within an Oncology and Loneliness Scope," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-7, February.
    20. Makoza, Frank, 2023. "Analyzing policy change of Malawi ICT and Digitalization policy: Policy Assemblage Perspective," EconStor Preprints 273309, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    21. Pijpers, Kevin, 2024. "Urban Living Labs in times of post-pandemic epistemic injustices: a speculative realist revision," SocArXiv rh6fc, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:40:y:2023:i:3:p:341-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.