IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v11y2024i7p922-941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Educational Policy Formulation and Implementation Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Ngozi ELEMS-IKWEGBU, Ph.D

    (Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.)

Abstract

Educational policy formulation and implementation are critical components for improving educational systems worldwide, yet significant disparities exist between developed and developing countries. This paper explores these disparities and presents a comparative analysis of the strategies employed in both contexts. Drawing on key theories like the Policy Cycle and Actor-Network Theory, the comparative analysis examined how these frameworks inform the processes of policy formulation and implementation. Data were drawn from 53 peer reviewed articles gotten through a systematic search in online databases including Google Scholar, Sematic Scholars, Paperity and Ethos. The analysis reveals that both developed and developing countries emphasize evidence-based policy making, stakeholder engagement, capacity building, and the integration of technology in education. Developed countries have a more robust financial resources, advanced technology, and stable political environments, enabling robust funding systems and continuous policy adaptation. In contrast, developing countries face challenges such as inadequate funding, political instability, and bureaucratic inefficiencies, focusing more on community engagement and infrastructure development. Despite these challenges, developing countries like Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya have made significant strides in improving educational outcomes through strategic partnerships and targeted policy interventions. The study concludes with implications for practice and recommendations for policymakers in developing countries, emphasizing the need for diversified funding models, technological integration, strengthened governance, stakeholder engagement, and continuous evaluation to enhance educational policy effectiveness and sustainability. The findings highlight the importance of context-specific approaches and the potential for developing countries to learn from the experiences of developed nations in creating robust educational systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Ngozi ELEMS-IKWEGBU, Ph.D, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Educational Policy Formulation and Implementation Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(7), pages 922-941, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:7:p:922-941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-11-issue-7/922-941.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/comparative-analysis-of-educational-policy-formulation-and-implementation-strategies-in-developed-and-developing-countries/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Pamela Villa Alvarez & Valentina Auricchio & Marzia Mortati, 2022. "Mapping design activities and methods of public sector innovation units through the policy cycle model," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 89-136, March.
    2. Romane Viennet & Beatriz Pont, 2017. "Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework," OECD Education Working Papers 162, OECD Publishing.
    3. Jagers, Sverker C. & Matti, Simon & Nordblom, Katarina, 2020. "The evolution of public policy attitudes: comparing the mechanisms of policy support across the stages of a policy cycle," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 428-448, September.
    4. Giada Marchi & Giulia Lucertini & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2016. "From evidence-based policy making to policy analytics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 15-38, January.
    5. Giada Marchi & Giulia Lucertini & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2016. "From evidence-based policy making to policy analytics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 15-38, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2021. "Multinational Enterprises And Economic Nationalism: A Strategic Analysis Of Culture," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 19-66.
    2. Maria Franca Norese & Diana Rolando & Rocco Curto, 2023. "DIKEDOC: a multicriteria methodology to organise and communicate knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1049-1082, June.
    3. Justin Longo & Alan Rodney Dobell, 2018. "The Limits of Policy Analytics: Early Examples and the Emerging Boundary of Possibilities," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 5-17.
    4. Raffaele Giordano & Marcela Brugnach & Irene Pluchinotta, 2017. "Ambiguity in Problem Framing as a Barrier to Collective Actions: Some Hints from Groundwater Protection Policy in the Apulia Region," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 911-932, September.
    5. Giliberto Capano & Anna Malandrino, 2022. "Mapping the use of knowledge in policymaking: barriers and facilitators from a subjectivist perspective (1990–2020)," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 399-428, September.
    6. Hannigan, Timothy R. & Briggs, Anthony R. & Valadao, Rodrigo & Seidel, Marc-David L. & Jennings, P. Devereaux, 2022. "A new tool for policymakers: Mapping cultural possibilities in an emerging AI entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    7. Craig Scott & Jennifer Zwicker, 2020. "Health innovation and commercialization ecosystems and public health emergency response systems," SPP Communique, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 13(6), April.
    8. Lu, Chao & Liu, Hu-Chen & Tao, Jie & Rong, Ke & Hsieh, Ying-Che, 2017. "A key stakeholder-based financial subsidy stimulation for Chinese EV industrialization: A system dynamics simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 0. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    10. Simonofski, Anthony & Handekyn, Phebe & Vandennieuwenborg, Celien & Wautelet, Yves & Snoeck, Monique, 2023. "Smart mobility projects: Towards the formalization of a policy-making lifecycle," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Antoine Richard & Brice Mayag & François Talbot & Alexis Tsoukias & Yves Meinard, 2020. "What does it mean to provide decision support to a responsible and competent expert?," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(3), pages 205-236, November.
    12. Irene Pluchinotta & Akin O. Kazakçi & Raffaele Giordano & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2019. "Design Theory for Generating Alternatives in Public Decision Making Processes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 341-375, April.
    13. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 2021. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 28-57, March.
    14. Ferretti, Valentina & Pluchinotta, Irene & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2019. "Studying the generation of alternatives in public policy making processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 353-363.
    15. Nicolas Fayard & Chabane Mazri & Alexis Tsouki`as, 2021. "Is the Capability approach a useful tool for decision aiding in public policy making?," Papers 2101.09357, arXiv.org.
    16. Fancello, Giovanna & Congiu, Tanja & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2020. "Mapping walkability. A subjective value theory approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Hazel S. Zamora, 2021. "Experiences on the Implementation of Child Protection Policies," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(10), pages 740-745, October.
    18. Matt Andrews, 2022. "Getting Real about Unknowns in Complex Policy Work," CID Working Papers 406, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    19. Sojeong Kim & Adam M. Wellstead & Tanya Heikkila, 2023. "Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 341-362, May.
    20. repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:171-187. is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Urquhart, Julie & Ambrose-Oji, Bianca & Chiswell, Hannah & Courtney, Paul & Lewis, Nick & Powell, John & Reed, Matt & Williams, Chris, 2023. "A co-design framework for natural resource policy making: Insights from tree health and fisheries in the United Kingdom," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:7:p:922-941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.