IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v69y2020i3p525-545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structured penalized regression for drug sensitivity prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Zhao
  • Manuela Zucknick

Abstract

Large‐scale in vitro drug sensitivity screens are an important tool in personalized oncology to predict the effectiveness of potential cancer drugs. The prediction of the sensitivity of cancer cell lines to a panel of drugs is a multivariate regression problem with high dimensional heterogeneous multiomics data as input data and with potentially strong correlations between the outcome variables which represent the sensitivity to the different drugs. We propose a joint penalized regression approach with structured penalty terms which enable us to utilize the correlation structure between drugs with group‐lasso‐type penalties and at the same time address the heterogeneity between ‘omics’ data sources by introducing data‐source‐specific penalty factors to penalize different data sources differently. By combining integrative penalty factors (IPFs) with the tree‐guided group lasso, we create a method called ‘IPF‐tree‐lasso’. We present a unified framework to transform more general IPF‐type methods to the original penalized method. Because the structured penalty terms have multiple parameters, we demonstrate how the interval search ‘Efficient parameter selection via global optimization’ algorithm can be used to optimize multiple penalty parameters efficiently. Simulation studies show that IPF‐tree‐lasso can improve the prediction performance compared with other lasso‐type methods, in particular for heterogeneous sources of data. Finally, we employ the new methods to analyse data from the ‘Genomics of drug sensitivity in cancer’ project.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Zhao & Manuela Zucknick, 2020. "Structured penalized regression for drug sensitivity prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(3), pages 525-545, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:3:p:525-545
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12400
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanming Li & Bin Nan & Ji Zhu, 2015. "Multivariate sparse group lasso for the multivariate multiple linear regression with an arbitrary group structure," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 354-363, June.
    2. Sill, Martin & Hielscher, Thomas & Becker, Natalia & Zucknick, Manuela, 2014. "c060: Extended Inference with Lasso and Elastic-Net Regularized Cox and Generalized Linear Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 62(i05).
    3. Bergersen Linn Cecilie & Glad Ingrid K. & Lyng Heidi, 2011. "Weighted Lasso with Data Integration," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    5. Peter M. Haverty & Eva Lin & Jenille Tan & Yihong Yu & Billy Lam & Steve Lianoglou & Richard M. Neve & Scott Martin & Jeff Settleman & Robert L. Yauch & Richard Bourgon, 2016. "Reproducible pharmacogenomic profiling of cancer cell line panels," Nature, Nature, vol. 533(7603), pages 333-337, May.
    6. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wentao Wang & Jiaxuan Liang & Rong Liu & Yunquan Song & Min Zhang, 2022. "A Robust Variable Selection Method for Sparse Online Regression via the Elastic Net Penalty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Yu-Zhu Tian & Man-Lai Tang & Mao-Zai Tian, 2021. "Bayesian joint inference for multivariate quantile regression model with L $$_{1/2}$$ 1 / 2 penalty," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2967-2994, December.
    3. Armin Rauschenberger & Iuliana Ciocănea-Teodorescu & Marianne A. Jonker & Renée X. Menezes & Mark A. Wiel, 2020. "Sparse classification with paired covariates," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(3), pages 571-588, September.
    4. Bai, Ray & Ghosh, Malay, 2018. "High-dimensional multivariate posterior consistency under global–local shrinkage priors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 157-170.
    5. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    6. Oxana Babecka Kucharcukova & Jan Bruha, 2016. "Nowcasting the Czech Trade Balance," Working Papers 2016/11, Czech National Bank.
    7. Carstensen, Kai & Heinrich, Markus & Reif, Magnus & Wolters, Maik H., 2020. "Predicting ordinary and severe recessions with a three-state Markov-switching dynamic factor model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 829-850.
    8. Hou-Tai Chang & Ping-Huai Wang & Wei-Fang Chen & Chen-Ju Lin, 2022. "Risk Assessment of Early Lung Cancer with LDCT and Health Examinations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    10. Nicolaj N. Mühlbach, 2020. "Tree-based Synthetic Control Methods: Consequences of moving the US Embassy," CREATES Research Papers 2020-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    11. Wang, Qiao & Zhou, Wei & Cheng, Yonggang & Ma, Gang & Chang, Xiaolin & Miao, Yu & Chen, E, 2018. "Regularized moving least-square method and regularized improved interpolating moving least-square method with nonsingular moment matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 120-145.
    12. Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy & Adrian S. Lewis, 2018. "Error Bounds, Quadratic Growth, and Linear Convergence of Proximal Methods," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 919-948, August.
    13. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    14. Lucian Belascu & Alexandra Horobet & Georgiana Vrinceanu & Consuela Popescu, 2021. "Performance Dissimilarities in European Union Manufacturing: The Effect of Ownership and Technological Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    16. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 597-623, September.
    17. Andrea Carriero & Todd E. Clark & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2022. "Specification Choices in Quantile Regression for Empirical Macroeconomics," Working Papers 22-25, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    18. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    19. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    20. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:3:p:525-545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.