IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v54y2005i3p469-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian analysis of single‐molecule experimental data

Author

Listed:
  • S. C. Kou
  • X. Sunney Xie
  • Jun S. Liu

Abstract

Summary. Recent advances in experimental technologies allow scientists to follow biochemical processes on a single‐molecule basis, which provides much richer information about chemical dynamics than traditional ensemble‐averaged experiments but also raises many new statistical challenges. The paper provides the first likelihood‐based statistical analysis of the single‐molecule fluorescence lifetime experiment designed to probe the conformational dynamics of a single deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) hairpin molecule. The conformational change is initially treated as a continuous time two‐state Markov chain, which is not observable and must be inferred from changes in photon emissions. This model is further complicated by unobserved molecular Brownian diffusions. Beyond the simple two‐state model, a competing model that models the energy barrier between the two states of the DNA hairpin as an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process has been suggested in the literature. We first derive the likelihood function of the simple two‐state model and then generalize the method to handle complications such as unobserved molecular diffusions and the fluctuating energy barrier. The data augmentation technique and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are developed to sample from the posterior distribution desired. The Bayes factor calculation and posterior estimates of relevant parameters indicate that the fluctuating barrier model fits the data better than the simple two‐state model.

Suggested Citation

  • S. C. Kou & X. Sunney Xie & Jun S. Liu, 2005. "Bayesian analysis of single‐molecule experimental data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(3), pages 469-506, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:54:y:2005:i:3:p:469-506
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00509.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00509.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00509.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griffin, J.E. & Steel, M.F.J., 2006. "Inference with non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes for stochastic volatility," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 605-644, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Xian, Alan, 2021. "Modelling and understanding count processes through a Markov-modulated non-homogeneous Poisson process framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 177-195.
    2. Benjamin Avanzi & Greg Taylor & Bernard Wong & Alan Xian, 2020. "Modelling and understanding count processes through a Markov-modulated non-homogeneous Poisson process framework," Papers 2003.13888, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    3. Paul Fearnhead & Omiros Papaspiliopoulos & Gareth O. Roberts, 2008. "Particle filters for partially observed diffusions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 755-777, September.
    4. Yong Li & Jun Yu, 2019. "An Improved Bayesian Unit Root Test in Stochastic Volatility Models," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 20(1), pages 103-122, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Almut Veraart & Luitgard Veraart, 2012. "Stochastic volatility and stochastic leverage," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 205-233, May.
    2. Gonzalez, Jhonny & Moriarty, John & Palczewski, Jan, 2017. "Bayesian calibration and number of jump components in electricity spot price models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 375-388.
    3. Piotr Szczepocki, 2020. "Application of iterated filtering to stochastic volatility models based on non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(2), pages 173-187, June.
    4. Yan-Feng Wu & Xiangyu Yang & Jian-Qiang Hu, 2024. "Method of Moments Estimation for Affine Stochastic Volatility Models," Papers 2408.09185, arXiv.org.
    5. Roberto León-González, 2019. "Efficient Bayesian inference in generalized inverse gamma processes for stochastic volatility," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 899-920, September.
    6. Shu, Yin & Feng, Qianmei & Liu, Hao, 2019. "Using degradation-with-jump measures to estimate life characteristics of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Billio, Monica & Casarin, Roberto & Rossini, Luca, 2019. "Bayesian nonparametric sparse VAR models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 97-115.
    8. Almut E. D. Veraart, 2008. "Impact of time–inhomogeneous jumps and leverage type effects on returns and realised variances," CREATES Research Papers 2008-57, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    9. Creal, Drew D., 2008. "Analysis of filtering and smoothing algorithms for Lévy-driven stochastic volatility models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 2863-2876, February.
    10. Anzarut, Michelle & Mena, Ramsés H., 2019. "A Harris process to model stochastic volatility," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 151-169.
    11. Emanuele Taufer, 2008. "Characteristic function estimation of non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes," DISA Working Papers 0805, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 07 Jul 2008.
    12. Friedrich Hubalek & Petra Posedel, 2011. "Joint analysis and estimation of stock prices and trading volume in Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard stochastic volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(6), pages 917-932.
    13. Brix, Anne Floor & Lunde, Asger & Wei, Wei, 2018. "A generalized Schwartz model for energy spot prices — Estimation using a particle MCMC method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 560-582.
    14. Griffin, J.E. & Steel, M.F.J., 2010. "Bayesian inference with stochastic volatility models using continuous superpositions of non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 2594-2608, November.
    15. Shibin Zhang & Xinsheng Zhang, 2008. "Exact Simulation of IG-OU Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 337-355, September.
    16. Fasen, Vicky, 2013. "Statistical estimation of multivariate Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes and applications to co-integration," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 325-337.
    17. Raknerud, Arvid & Skare, Øivind, 2012. "Indirect inference methods for stochastic volatility models based on non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3260-3275.
    18. Kevin W. Lu, 2022. "Calibration for multivariate Lévy-driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes with applications to weak subordination," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 365-396, July.
    19. Mehrdoust, Farshid & Noorani, Idin & Kanniainen, Juho, 2024. "Valuation of option price in commodity markets described by a Markov-switching model: A case study of WTI crude oil market," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 228-269.
    20. Taufer, Emanuele & Leonenko, Nikolai & Bee, Marco, 2011. "Characteristic function estimation of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck-based stochastic volatility models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(8), pages 2525-2539, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:54:y:2005:i:3:p:469-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.