IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v35y1998i4p437-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintaining Leadership Legitimacy in the Transition to New Organizational Forms

Author

Listed:
  • Bala Chakravarthy
  • Martin Gargiulo

Abstract

Numerous new organizational forms have been proposed for ensuring the continuous strategic renewal of a firm. In essence, these forms are distinguished by: (1) their emphasis on bottom‐up entrepreneurship, and (2) their reliance on a co‐operative network that allows these entrepreneurial units to share their competencies with one another. One of the key behaviours required for the success of such an organization is employee empowerment. We argue in this paper that the legitimacy of corporate leadership during the restructuring of a traditional bureaucratic organization is crucial to its eventual transformation to one of the new organizational forms. The current wisdom of a two‐stage transformation process, where an authoritarian restructuring precedes the more participative revitalization, is thus challenged. The transformation may get stalled after the restructuring stage because of top management’s inability to empower the firm’s employees at will, having lost their trust during restructuring

Suggested Citation

  • Bala Chakravarthy & Martin Gargiulo, 1998. "Maintaining Leadership Legitimacy in the Transition to New Organizational Forms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 437-456, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:4:p:437-456
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrian Klammer & Stefan Gueldenberg & Sascha Kraus & Michele O’Dwyer, 0. "To change or not to change–antecedents and outcomes of strategic renewal in SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    2. Adrian Klammer & Stefan Gueldenberg & Sascha Kraus & Michele O’Dwyer, 2017. "To change or not to change–antecedents and outcomes of strategic renewal in SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 739-756, September.
    3. Paul Bate & Raza Khan & Annie Pye, 2000. "Towards A Culturally Sensitive Approach To Organization Structuring: Where Organization Design Meets Organization Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 197-211, April.
    4. Michael Stull & John D. Aram, 2010. "Exploring Trust As An Influencing Mechanism Of Intrapreneurship," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(3), pages 17-38.
    5. Caliz, Cristina & Quintanilla, Javier & Pin, Jose R., 2001. "Influencia de la nueva economía en la dirección de personas," IESE Research Papers D/440, IESE Business School.
    6. Régis Dumoulin, 1999. "La difficile instauration du partenariat dans le secteur du bâtiment et des travaux publics: une analyse par les mécanismes de contrôle," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 2(4), pages 31-51, December.
    7. Régis Dumoulin & Valérie François, 2002. "Développement et performance d'une structure relationnelle: l'exemple de la logistique d'un groupe de distribution," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(2), pages 33-60, June.
    8. Jill A. Brown & Peter T. Gianiodis & Michael D. Santoro, 2015. "Following Doctors’ Orders: Organizational Change as a Response to Human Capital Bargaining Power," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1284-1300, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:4:p:437-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.