IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v74y2023i12p1401-1418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User empowerment and well‐being with mHealth apps during pandemics: A mix‐methods investigation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongyun Zhou
  • Xiao‐Ling Jin
  • Carol Hsu
  • Zhenya Tang

Abstract

As a healthcare ICT4D solution, mobile health (mHealth) can potentially improve users' well‐being during pandemics, especially in developing countries with limited healthcare resources. Recent ICT4D research reveals that providing end‐users with access to ICT is insufficient for improving well‐being and, thus, understanding how mHealth empowers end‐users to enhance well‐being against stressful events is important. However, prior research has rarely discussed the issue of empowerment in the domain of mHealth or the context of major disruptive events. This paper contributes to the literature by conceptualizing the psychological empowerment of mHealth users (PEMU) and investigating its nomological network during pandemics. Drawing upon theories of psychological empowerment and event characteristics, we developed a research model and tested it through a mixed‐methods investigation, containing a quantitative study with 602 Chinese mHealth users during COVID‐19 and a follow‐up qualitative study of 326 online articles and reviews. We found that PEMU, driven by three technological characteristics (perceived response efficacy, ease of use, and mHealth quality), affects well‐being through both (a) a stress‐buffering effect, which counterbalances the detrimental, stress‐increasing effects of event criticality and disruption, and (b) a vitality‐stimulating effect, which is intensified by event criticality. These findings have important implications for ICT4D research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongyun Zhou & Xiao‐Ling Jin & Carol Hsu & Zhenya Tang, 2023. "User empowerment and well‐being with mHealth apps during pandemics: A mix‐methods investigation in China," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(12), pages 1401-1418, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:12:p:1401-1418
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24695
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew J. Hoffman & William Ocasio, 2001. "Not All Events Are Attended Equally: Toward a Middle-Range Theory of Industry Attention to External Events," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 414-434, August.
    2. Xiao-Ling Jin & Zhongyun Zhou & Yiwei Tian, 2022. "A Configurational Analysis of the Causes of Consumer Indirect Misbehaviors in Access-Based Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 135-166, January.
    3. Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Irwin Brown & Peter Meso, 2022. "Advancing the Development of Contextually Relevant ICT4D Theories - From Explanation to Design," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-6, January.
    4. Anne-Françoise Audrain-Pontevia & Loick Menvielle, 2018. "Do online health communities enhance patient–physician relationship? An assessment of the impact of social support and patient empowerment," Post-Print hal-02059901, HAL.
    5. Ping Zhang & Jasy Liew Suet Yan & Katie DeVries Hassman, 2013. "The intellectual characteristics of the information field: Heritage and substance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(12), pages 2468-2491, December.
    6. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    7. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    8. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    9. Xusen Cheng & Linlin Su & Xin (Robert) Luo & Jose Benitez & Shun Cai, 2022. "The good, the bad, and the ugly: impact of analytics and artificial intelligence-enabled personal information collection on privacy and participation in ridesharing," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 339-363, May.
    10. Li, Jiaoyang & Zhang, Cheng & Li, Xixi & Zhang, Chenghong, 2020. "Patients’ emotional bonding with MHealth apps: An attachment perspective on patients’ use of MHealth applications," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    11. Marios Koufaris, 2002. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 205-223, June.
    12. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong & Lewis C. Chasalow & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2014. "A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 111-136, March.
    13. Ping Zhang & Jasy Liew Suet Yan & Katie DeVries Hassman, 2013. "The intellectual characteristics of the information field: Heritage and substance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(12), pages 2468-2491, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    2. Halpern, Nigel & Mwesiumo, Deodat & Suau-Sanchez, Pere & Budd, Thomas & Bråthen, Svein, 2021. "Ready for digital transformation? The effect of organisational readiness, innovation, airport size and ownership on digital change at airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Shabnam H. A. Zanjani & George R. Milne & Elizabeth G. Miller, 2016. "Procrastinators’ online experience and purchase behavior," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 568-585, September.
    4. Zhani, Najlae & Mouri, Nacef & Ahmed, Tariq, 2022. "The role of mobile value and trust as drivers of purchase intentions in m-servicescape," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Aboubaker Ettis, Saïd, 2017. "Examining the relationships between online store atmospheric color, flow experience and consumer behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 43-55.
    6. Manoj A. Thomas & Yan Li & Vera Sistenich & Ken Ngoy Diango & Diulu Kabongo, 2023. "A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(12), pages 1384-1400, December.
    7. Sheng Cheng & Liqun Liu & Ke Li, 2020. "Explaining the Factors Influencing the Individuals’ Continuance Intention to Seek Information on Weibo during Rainstorm Disasters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Nguyen, Stephanie & Nicod, Lionel & Llosa, Sylvie, 2024. "Preventing bypass on sharing economy platforms: The impact of message framing on users’ bypass intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Xiaoling Jin & Zhangshuai Yuan & Zhongyun Zhou, 2023. "Understanding the Antecedents and Effects of mHealth App Use in Pandemics: A Sequential Mixed-Method Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Lin, Hsin-Hui & Tseng, Timmy H. & Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Liao, Yi-Wen & Wang, Yi-Shun, 2020. "What drives customers’ post-purchase price search intention in the context of online price matching guarantees," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Schiemann, Frank & Tietmeyer, Raphael, 2022. "ESG Controversies, ESG Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Arghashi, Vahideh & Yuksel, Cenk Arsun, 2022. "Interactivity, Inspiration, and Perceived Usefulness! How retailers’ AR-apps improve consumer engagement through flow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Saïd Aboubaker Ettis & Jean-Éric Pelet & Judith Lynne Zaichkowsky, 2024. "Comparing online user experience across different digital business ecosystems and platforms when booking vacations," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(9), pages 2613-2642, September.
    15. Shalini R. Urs & Mohamed Minhaj, 2023. "Evolution of data science and its education in iSchools: An impressionistic study using curriculum analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 606-622, June.
    16. Rana Muhammad Sohail Jafar & Wasim Ahmad & Yi Chen, 2024. "Metaverse in Human Behavior: The Role of Telepresence and Flow Experience on Consumers’ Shopping Behavior in the Metaverse," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    17. Abbes, Intissar & Hallem, Yousra & Taga, Nadia, 2020. "Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    18. Soheila Raeisi & Meng Lingjie & Nur Suhaili Binti Ramli, 2019. "A Hierarchical Model of Mediation Effect of Motivation (MO) between Internal Marketing (IM) and Service Innovation (SI)," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Gillespie, Brian & Muehling, Darrel D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2018. "Fitting product placements: Affective fit and cognitive fit as determinants of consumer evaluations of placed brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 90-102.
    20. Sehrash Siddique & Amer Rajput, 2022. "Self-expressiveness and hedonic brand affect brand love through brand jealousy," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:12:p:1401-1418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.