IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v73y2022i1p3-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the impact of emotions on perceiving serendipitous information encountering

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Sun
  • Xiaosong Zhou
  • Qingfeng Wang
  • Sarah Sharples

Abstract

Despite the potential importance of emotional aspects in information seeking, there is a lack of adequate attention to emotions' role in facilitating serendipitous information encountering. This paper contributes to this research gap by investigating the role of emotions during the process of perceiving and experiencing serendipitous information encountering in a controlled laboratory setting. The results show that applying a sketch game can stimulate participants' emotions. Our findings indicate that participants are more likely to experience serendipitous information encountering under the influence of positive emotions. This study contributes to an understanding of the relationship between emotions and the perception of serendipitous information encountering. The implications of the possibilities of facilitating positive emotions to induce serendipitous information encountering are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Sun & Xiaosong Zhou & Qingfeng Wang & Sarah Sharples, 2022. "Investigating the impact of emotions on perceiving serendipitous information encountering," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 3-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:1:p:3-18
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24540
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jialu Li & Meiying Yang & Wei Xing & Xuan Zhao, 2018. "Information Acquisition Behavior: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 434-455, June.
    2. Di Caprio, Debora & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Tavana, Madjid, 2019. "The role of anticipated emotions and the value of information in determining sequential search incentives," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    3. Lori McCay-Peet & Elaine G. Toms, 2015. "Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(7), pages 1463-1476, July.
    4. Luce, Mary Frances, 1998. "Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 409-433, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drescher, Larissa S. & Hasselbach, Johanna, 2014. "Food Choices under Stress: Considering Internet Usage and Social Support," 2014 AAEA/EAAE/CAES Joint Symposium: Social Networks, Social Media and the Economics of Food, May 29-30, 2014, Montreal, Canada 166097, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Saravanan Thirumuruganathan & Soon-gyo Jung & Dianne Ramirez Robillos & Joni Salminen & Bernard J. Jansen, 2021. "Forecasting the nearly unforecastable: why aren’t airline bookings adhering to the prediction algorithm?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 73-100, March.
    3. Amos Schurr & Yaakov Kareev & Judith Avrahami & Ilana Ritov, 2012. "Taking the Broad Perspective: Risky Choices in Repeated Proficiency Tasks," Discussion Paper Series dp621, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    4. Magnus Söderberg, 2008. "Uncertainty and regulatory outcome in the Swedish electricity distribution sector," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 79-94, February.
    5. Cristel Russell & Dale Russell & Jill Klein, 2011. "Ambivalence toward a country and consumers’ willingness to buy emblematic brands: The differential predictive validity of objective and subjective ambivalence measures on behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 357-371, November.
    6. White, Gareth R.T. & Samuel, Anthony, 2019. "Programmatic Advertising: Forewarning and avoiding hype-cycle failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 157-168.
    7. Blut, Markus & Chowdhry, Nivriti & Mittal, Vikas & Brock, Christian, 2015. "E-Service Quality: A Meta-Analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 679-700.
    8. Stephann Makri, 2020. "Information informing design: Information Science research with implications for the design of digital information environments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1402-1412, November.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:51-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Brockman, Beverly K. & Taylor, Valerie A. & Brockman, Christopher M., 2008. "The price of unconditional love: Consumer decision making for high-dollar veterinary care," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 397-405, May.
    11. Inman, J.J. & Zeelenberg, M., 2002. "Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions : The attenuating role of decision justifiability," Other publications TiSEM 44060120-bd30-40e0-a97f-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    13. Kadic-Maglajlic, Selma & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Micevski, Milena & Dlacic, Jasmina & Zabkar, Vesna, 2019. "Being engaged is a good thing: Understanding sustainable consumption behavior among young adults," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 644-654.
    14. Carol L. Esmark & Stephanie M. Noble, 2018. "Retail space invaders: when employees’ invasion of customer space increases purchase intentions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 477-496, May.
    15. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:62-74 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Argyris, Young Anna & Kim, Yongsuk & Roscizewski, Alexa & Song, Won, 2021. "The mediating role of vaccine hesitancy between maternal engagement with anti- and pro-vaccine social media posts and adolescent HPV-vaccine uptake rates in the US: The perspective of loss aversion in," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    17. Sujan, M. & Sujan, H. & Bettman, J. & Verhallen, T.M.M., 1999. "Sources of consumers stress and their coping strategies," Other publications TiSEM c9a16fdd-5d47-453d-b281-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Mark Heitmann & Andreas Herrmann, 2007. "Die Zufriedenheit mit dem Entscheidungsprozess als Determinante der Kundenbindung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 530-566, August.
    19. Indranil Goswami & Oleg Urminsky, 2016. "When should the ask be a nudge? The Effect of Default Amounts on Charitable Donations," Natural Field Experiments 00659, The Field Experiments Website.
    20. Hernan E. Riquelme & Abdulaziz Alqallaf, 2020. "Anticipated emotions and their effects on risk and opportunity evaluations," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 312-335, September.
    21. Stinshoff, Volker, 2020. "Selbst gemacht ist gut gemacht? Der Einfluss von Self-Service Reporting auf die Qualität von Managemententscheidungen," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 5(2), pages 223-245.
    22. Cremonini, Marco, 2016. "Introducing serendipity in a social network model of knowledge diffusion," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 64-71.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:1:p:3-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.